Penguin
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 56
If you insist, please do call these facts. Just remember you didn't get this from any policy statement or anything.The US wants to take a support role in the Middle east is a fact proven in Yemen and Syria.. you can read about it anywhere..
One should take things in their context.. the word SHOULD came as a confirmation to the $100 billion deal, which is a fact according to the US statements..
I see. I suppose that's why you said you " think that 4 DDG51 with AEGIS and SM-3- 6 are a possibility (it is foolish to think 14 DDG51s)"KSA interest in destroyers with ABM capabilities was confused with the tailor made LCS.. all that was shelved.. the price of $11 billion for 4 LCS and the delivery dates did not fit the Saudi requirements, also because they wanted AEGIS and SM-3 and 6, so there is no point discussing this, let's wait and see..
4 DDG51s = 7.2 billion = 36%The $20 for naval expansion can bring in a whole lot of systems including a few DDG51s..what it can bring in is still to be seen..
2 DDG51s 3.6 billion = 18%
Alvaro the Bazan / F100 frigate
F101/4 €453m (~US$600m) each
F105 (the basis of the Australian Hobart-class destroyer) €834m (~US$1.1bn)
Hobart class A$8 billion for 3 ships (original contract cost) US$5.94 billion for 3 > US$1.98 billion per ship
Horizon class :
- - France: €1.08 billions FY 2009 (~US$1.5b)
- - Italy: € 1.5 billions FY2016
BMD won't come much cheaper.
Germany will not be able to deliver 1000 Leo2s