What's new

US Navy launches Tomahawk missiles at rebel sites in Yemen after attacks on U.S. ships

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
The U.S. Navy launched Tomahawk missiles early Thursday from the Red Sea at three coastal radar sites in Yemen, destroying targets associated with rebel missile attacks on U.S. ships this week.

The missiles were launched from the destroyer USS Nitze at about 4 a.m. at three locations north of the Bab el-Mandeb strait, said Pentagon Press Peter Cook. President Obama authorized the strikes upon the recommendations of Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter and Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“These limited self-defense strikes were conducted to protect our personnel, our ships, and our freedom of navigation in this important maritime passageway,” Cook said. “The United States will respond to any further threat to our ships and commercial traffic, as appropriate, and will continue to maintain our freedom of navigation in the Red Sea, the Bab al-Mandeb, and elsewhere around the world.”

The strikes were announced late Wednesday in Washington. A defense official said the radar sites were in remote areas held by Houthi rebels where there was little risk of civilian casualties. The equipment was set up near Ras Isa, north of Mukha and near Khoka. All are on Yemen’s western coastline.

The Tomahawk strikes followed cruise missiles attacks that were launched against Navy ships on Sunday night and Wednesday in Yemen. Another missile launched Oct. 1 caused near-catastrophic damage to the HSV-2 Swift, a catamaran-style high-speed vessel that was operated by the Emiratis and once was a part of the U.S. Navy. Video of the strike published online shows the ship engulfed in a fireball.

The Houthis, who use weapons smuggled from Iran, claimed responsibility for the attack on the Swift, but denied launching missiles at the Navy on Sunday. But Navy Capt. Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, said Tuesday that “the facts certainly point” to the Houthis being involved.

In the first attack launched at the U.S. Navy, two cruise missiles were launched Sunday at the USS Mason, a guided-missile destroyer, and the USS Ponce, an amphibious staging base. In that case, the first missile was launched while the ships were at least 12 miles away from Yemen’s shore in international waters near the Bab el-Mandeb strait, a waterway between Yemen and Djibouti that is heavily trafficked by oilers. The ships were even farther away when the second one was launched.

In the second attack Wednesday, at least one missile was fired from rebel-held territory at the Mason, Cook said. That missile was launched at about 6 p.m. from south of the coastal city Al Hudaydah. The Houthis pushed the central government out of power in the capital city of Sanaa in 2014, and has resisted U.S.-backed efforts by Saudi Arabia to restore President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi to power.

Adm. John Richardson, the chief of naval operations, said in a statement Wednesday that the Navy will remain on watch in the Red Sea. He credited the crew of the Mason for demonstrating “initiative and toughness” as they defended themselves from both attacks.

“These unjustified attacks are serious, but they will not deter us from our mission,” Richardson said. “We are trained and ready to defend ourselves and to respond quickly and decisively.”

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a foreign-policy think tank, said in an analysis published Wednesday that the Mason, the Nitze and the Ponce were ordered to patrol the area north of the strait after the attack on the Swift. The analysis, published by two Navy officers and a think-tank analyst, said that the attack Wednesday removes all doubt that the missiles fired Sunday were intentionally aimed at U.S. ships.

The missiles were launched at the U.S. ships after airstrikes on the funeral of a Houthi rebel leader in Sanaa killed more than 140 people and wounded hundreds more Saturday. U.S. defense officials, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to discuss ongoing operations, said Tuesday that it is all but certain that the Saudis carried out the strike.

The Saudis have waged an air war against the Houthis since March 2015, carrying out hundreds of airstrikes. The United States has backed the effort, but slowly backed away from it in recent months as concerns rise about the number of civilians killed. The death toll is close to 4,000.

A White House spokesman, Ned Price, said Saturday that the Obama administration was “deeply disturbed” by reports of the strikes on the funeral, and launching an immediate review of U.S. support for the Saudi-led campaign against the Houthis.

The Pentagon has provided logistical support, including aerial refueling, and intelligence that can be used for targeting to the Saudis. In recent months, however, they have dramatically scaled back that effort almost exclusively to refueling, citing concerns for how the Saudis have waged their war in Yemen.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...el-held-territory-in-yemen-at-u-s-navy-ships/
 
USS Nitze

US_Navy_070703-N-6403R-002_Guided-missile_destroyer_USS_Nitze_(DDG_94)_pulls_into_port_at_Naval_Station_Norfolk_after_a_six-month_deployment_as_part_of_Bataan_Expeditionary_Strike_Group_(ESG).jpg
 
Yes, and further reports are stating that it was Iranian Noor antiship cruise missiles and variant of the Chinese C-802 that the USS Mason successfully defended against.
There has been no missile st all.
They juat made that lie to have an excuse for supporting Saudis invasion.
 
There has been no missile st all.
They juat made that lie to have an excuse for supporting Saudis invasion.

thats what they do best


Americans just spanked persians



Ur profile pic is also a lie to protect khameni lifestyle

and you have to personally attack him to prove a delusional point?

America spanked persians? Ask America how is she getting raped in Syria by Persians and Russia...
 
The Iranians deserve it not for what they have been doing in Yemen but for what they have been doing in Syria. In Yemen the Iranian role is lot more restrained.
 
Yes, and further reports are stating that it was Iranian Noor antiship cruise missiles and variant of the Chinese C-802 that the USS Mason successfully defended against.

There hasn't been a single evidence of missile launches against any US ships, let alone being a C-802 missile. And various persons inside Yemeni army already denied US claims of shooting a missile towards US ships.

Considering the fact that US has a bright history when it comes to attacking other countries based on pure lies, there is a high probability that this attack has also been based on lies and nothing else. The most notable reason would be to shift attention from Saudi crimes in Yemen which is being committed by American weapons, including the most recent attack on funeral in Sanaa which killed and injured hundreds.


Given the history of US, one would be a fool to easily believe their version of history, unless there is a footage of missile attacks on American ships.

What makes this whole circus show even more suspicious? Various Saudi news agencies foolishly said they have targeted Iranian ships near the coast of Yemen which were bringing weapons to Houthis. Not only the news turned out to be a lie, but after few hours, US claimed its ships were targeted. There is a high probability that this was a friendly fire, which is either too embarassing to admit for US or they are too idiots to know the source of shooting towards them.

Saudi sources claiming they have targeted Iranian ships just hours before American announcement.
CukrUlkXYAASSti.jpg


Houthis literally gain zero by launching missiles towards American ships, and not one missile, but two, simultaneously, which is as stupid as it sounds. Another pathetic lying from US side, and God knows when it will be exposed like the lie that was used to invade Iraq.

--------------------------------

@raptor22 @kollang @haman10 @AmirPatriot @warfareknow @f1000n @Ceylal @JEskandari @Desert Fox @mohsen @SinoSoldier
 
Last edited:
thats what they do best




and you have to personally attack him to prove a delusional point?

America spanked persians? Ask America how is she getting raped in Syria by Persians and Russia...

Actually when it comes to Iran terror activities in the region, the US is in cooperation with Iran in Iraq, neutral in Syria and nominally against Iran in Yemen. The US attack was like surprise to me.
I think the Saudi-led coalition should be careful of the US recent attack.

There hasn't been a single evidence of missile launches against any US ships, let alone being a C-802 missile. And various persons inside Yemeni army already denied US claims of shooting a missile towards US ships.

Considering the fact that US has a bright history when it comes to attacking other countries based on pure lies, there is a high probability that this attack has also been based on lies and nothing else. The most notable reason would be to shift attention from Saudi crimes in Yemen which is being committed by American weapons, including the most recent attack on funeral in Sanaa which killed and injured hundreds.


Given the history of US, one would be a fool to easily believe their version of history, unless there is a footage of missile attacks on American ships.

What makes this whole circus show even more suspicious? Various Saudi news agencies foolishly said they have targeted Iranian ships near the coast of Yemen which were bringing weapons to Houthis. Not only the news turned out to be a lie, but after few hours, US claimed its ships were targeted. There is a high probability that this was a friendly fire, which is either too embarassing to admit for US or they are too idiots to know the source of shooting towards them.

Saudi sources claiming they have targeted Iranian ships just hours before American announcement.
CukrUlkXYAASSti.jpg


Houthis literally gain zero by launching missiles towards American ships, and not one missile, but two, simultaneously, which is as stupid as it sounds. Another pathetic lying from US side, and God knows when it will be exposed like the lie that was used to invade Iraq.

--------------------------------

@raptor22 @kollang @haman10 @AmirPatriot @warfareknow @f1000n @Ceylal @JEskandari @Desert Fox @mohsen @SinoSoldier

Okay, but Houthi terrorists have been chanting and barking "Death to America, Death to Israel, Death to the Jewish" for decades and here America came by its warship next to them, why they & you are trying to run away from fighting the US.
I find it hilarious, you have been waiting for years to kill Americans, then go show us your muscles coward safavids.
Safavids kill Syrians to liberate Palestine and they kill Yemenis to attack America. o_O
hhhhhhhh Wallahi you guys are pathetic as hell.

hqdefault.jpg

this is Houthi terrorists' slogan.
 
Okay, but Houthi terrorists have been chanting and barking "Death to America, Death to Israel, Death to the Jewish" for decades and here America came by its warship next to them, why they & you are trying to run away from fighting the US.
I find it hilarious, you have been waiting for years to kill Americans, then go show us your muscles coward safavids.
Safavids kill Syrians to liberate Palestine and they kill Yemenis to attack America. o_O
hhhhhhhh Wallahi you guys are pathetic as hell.

hqdefault.jpg

this is Houthi terrorists' slogan.

As expected, you couldn't and didn't answer a single point in my post and wrote bunch of nonsense instead.

Let me reaffirm my position again: Saudis have most probably fucked up and shot at an American ship, and US is either concealing it or doesn't even know the source of fire. And now they are covering for the screw up of Saudi forces.

CukrUlkXYAASSti.jpg
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom