US NAVAL BASE ,On BD !! True Or Lie ??

[Md Akmal]

You completely lose credibility there.

@ I also agree with eastwatch that its military will never equal to that of the USA unless some European countries seriously helped her with military technology.

@ I was telling that in the long run even a war breaks out between China and India, I think India will be winner. India has the capability of outsourcing which China does not have.

@ I give you a simple example at present India is having more than three Aircraft Carriers which China do not have. Indian latest aircraft can go deep inside China. And I have lot of doubts whether Chinese missiles and air defense system can hit its aircraft.

@ We have seen the capabilities of these Chinese/Russian version missiles and aircraft in the Gulf Wars. Well China may be good in ground battle, they might have million of army but -------

 

[integra]

The basic difference between Chinese and US spectrum is the word "R&D".
USA is lightyears ahead in this regards.

 

[UKBengali]

@ I also agree with eastwatch that its military will never equal to that of the USA unless some European countries seriously helped her with military technology.

@ I was telling that in the long run even a war breaks out between China and India, I think India will be winner. India has the capability of outsourcing which China does not have.

@ I give you a simple example at present India is having more than three Aircraft Carriers which China do not have. Indian latest aircraft can go deep inside China. And I have lot of doubts whether Chinese missiles and air defense system can hit its aircraft.

@ We have seen the capabilities of these Chinese/Russian version missiles and aircraft in the Gulf Wars. Well China may be good in ground battle, they might have million of army but -------

No disrespect but what on earth are you smoking????

Where the hell does India have three aircraft carriers? It has one and a tiny one at that.

Now how does India bomb China and get way with it?

It's best fighter SU-30MKI will be engaged by the likes of J-10 and J-11B and China has much
more of them than India has SU-30MKIs.

 

[Md Akmal]

No disrespect but what on earth are you smoking????

Where the hell does India have three aircraft carriers? It has one and a tiny one at that.

Now how does India bomb China and get way with it?

It's best fighter SU-30MKI will be engaged by the likes of J-10 and J-11B and China has much
more of them than India has SU-30MKIs.

@ Now wait a minute and hear from the Indian sides.

 

[GR!FF!N]

No disrespect but what on earth are you smoking????

Where the hell does India have three aircraft carriers? It has one and a tiny one at that.

Now how does India bomb China and get way with it?

It's best fighter SU-30MKI will be engaged by the likes of J-10 and J-11B and China has much
more of them than India has SU-30MKIs.

actually he forgot to mention by 2016,Viraat,Vikramaditya and Vikrant.

and no disrespect to J-11,but it is actually su-27.and India has other kinds of aircraft too like Mirage,Mig-29 for air dominance.i think in number game,India will win as India will divert its main force for war where China can't afford to loose hundreds of aircrafts(if India is defender and China is agressor.things will never go another way)

 

[UKBengali]

Instead of talking circular give us some knowledge about the reason of your prediction that even the Chinese do not dare to predict. Note what I say. If USA wins nods from Burma that it will not allow oil or gas pipeline from its port to yunnan and gets a similar nod from Bd as well, USA will cause China to starve without energy.

The way China is stealing the oil resources of other pacific countries, USA may punish it for that by choking its ME oil route through the Malakka. This will succede only BD and Burma do not allow their land to transport the ME energy to Yunnan. So, China will be forced to vacate the parts of Pacific sea that it has occupied by its naval power.

All these prove that China has little energy to say of, and therefore, it cabnnot develop the way people like you are dreaming of.

Your opinions prove nothing.

If China is "stealing" resources, then what has the US been doing since WW2?

Your arguments are not very well thought out or explained.

Ever heard of alternative shipments from Central Asia/Russia?

Still waiting for you to explain why China will never beat the US in total miliatry strength. Make a claim, then you back it up with logical arguments.

 

[GR!FF!N]

@ Now wait a minute and hear from the Indian sides.

you got me bro...

 

[UKBengali]

actually he forgot to mention by 2016,Viraat,Vikramaditya and Vikrant.

and no disrespect to J-11,but it is actually su-27.and India has other kinds of aircraft too like Mirage,Mig-29 for air dominance.i think in number game,India will win as India will divert its main force for war where China can't afford to loose hundreds of aircrafts(if India is defender and China is agressor.things will never go another way)

Yes and China is likely to have 3 carriers by then as well.

So what point was he trying to make then?

 

[integra]

Strategically speaking a war between China and India is
the last thing on Earth that Bangladesh should be expecting.
The day that starts is the day our sky turns red,
therefore it's better(for us) if they maintain a balance of power
nullifying an aggression from either side.

Our goal should be to integrate with the economy of this
countries as much as possible (which seems impossible right now)
and play the game of diplomacy. Obviously by integrating I meant
developing our export/import baskets.

 

[Zabaniyah]

You completely lose credibility there.

US is technologically light years ahead of China. Wait, why are we talking about this?

 

[PlanetSoldier]

@ No !!! I supported your point. I told you I was in China and closely observed their development. You know the Chinese army even does not have proper helmet and shoes.

@ 20/25 years back their troops used to fight with PT shoes. Their army even do not have proper belt. Their logistic system is still in a rudimentary stage.

If 20/25 years back Chinese troops used to fight with PT shoes, definitely 40 years back their situation was worse than that possibly bare footed. And 40 years back they showed their performance fighting india and annexing Aksai Chin which is an area of more than 32k sq. km. Now they have one aircraft carrier with 2/3 more upcoming, what can they do now? They have the combination of economic and military strength now. One issue they are going to heavily suffer from is the conflict with neighbors over South China sea. Hope they'll not act foolish like india does in such issue.

 

[PlanetSoldier]

US is technologically light years ahead of China. Wait, why are we talking about this?

Because we don't have SU-35, F-22, Aircraft Carriers and so on .

 

[zip]

China phenomenon or any other country which is developing is because of application of western science
if western countries go for deep sleep for a century then only these developing countries can dream to lead the world in scientific field

 

[kalu_miah]

Why do you think BD wants to be an ASEAN member. Every organization has its basic rules. ASEAN encompasses the region of south east asia. It has no obligation to include Bangladesh, a south asian country. ASEAN will remain limited upto Burma that lies also in the SE Asia. I have never heard this sort of things before. However, Bangladesh will remain a member of ASEAN Forum like some other countries. Some countries have again observer status.

This has been discussed in a number of posts in this thread:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-6.html#post3008712
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-6.html#post3009700
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-8.html#post3010675
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-8.html#post3014197
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-8.html#post3014731
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-8.html#post3015485

 

[TopCat]

This has been discussed in a number of posts in this thread:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-6.html#post3008712
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-6.html#post3009700
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-8.html#post3010675
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-8.html#post3014197
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-8.html#post3014731
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/180755-geopolitics-asean-region-8.html#post3015485

Thank you for your effort. But ASEAN block closely related to ethnic cultural geographic and economic block. We just dont fit in there. Whether we like it or not we got to stick with SAARC. We have another forum called BIMSTEC.