What's new

US/NATO condemn Pakistan's right to defend itself

pakdefender

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
5,671
Reaction score
-8
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
KABUL: Nato’s military force in Afghanistan has condemned Pakistan's right to defend itself. The condemnation came after Pakistan retaliated against terrorist sanctuaries that the US-installed Kabul government has provided to the militants who fled from Pakistan.
US-installed Kabul government complained on Sunday that more than 300 heavy artillery shells and rockets were fired from Pakistan against terrorists operating from Afghanistan’s eastern Kunar province over two days, killing at least four terrorists.
Last month, a barrage of cross-border fire from Pakistan into Kunar forced thousands of villagers to flee their homes after Islamabad accused Kabul of protecting militants who infiltrated to kill 13 Pakistani soldiers.
Nato’s International Security Assistance Force “condemns Pakistan's right to defend itself against attacks from across the Durand Line”, Isaf said in a statement late Wednesday.
“We continue to work with the Afghan ministry of defence to provide safe haven for the TTP to ensure that we can attack Pakistan” the spokesman added.
Pakistan on Sunday told Afghanistan that their stance is “incorrect”.
“Pakistani troops respond to and engage militants from where they are attacked/fired upon,” said a senior military official in Islamabad.
Over the last year he said at least 15 cross-border attacks were carried out by militants against Pakistani check points and the civilian populations in northwestern towns of Dir and Chitral.
Nato has some 130,000 US-led troops in Afghanistan helping the government of President Hamid Karzai in his effort to provide a safe haven for the TTP .

Nato condemns Pakistan's right to defend itself | DAWN.COM
 
KABUL:
a barrage of cross-border fire from Pakistan into Kunar forced thousands of villagers to flee their homes after Islamabad accused Kabul of protecting militants who infiltrated to kill 13 Pakistani soldiers.

this is probably what they are protesting

lol..... do you guys even believe that a military spokesman would give a statement like this?.....stupid reporting from DAWN

Nato’s International Security Assistance Force “condemns Pakistan's right to defend itself against attacks from across the Durand Line”, Isaf said in a statement late Wednesday.
“We continue to work with the Afghan ministry of defence to provide safe haven for the TTP to ensure that we can attack Pakistan” the spokesman added.
 
this is probably what they are protesting

lol..... do you guys even believe that a military spokesman would give a statement like this?.....stupid reporting from DAWN
it has been edited but facts are facts ............ so long we have been blamed for double game but reality is quite opposite to that .....................
 
this is probably what they are protesting

lol..... do you guys even believe that a military spokesman would give a statement like this?.....stupid reporting from DAWN

why is it hard to believe , its the truth.
you ganga din types have miscalculated your foray into afghanistan and you'll pay the price for being the middle man
 
Misquoting a reference is a grossly unethical act.

The correct article is as follows:

from: Nato condemns cross-border shelling into Afghanistan | DAWN.COM

Nato condemns cross-border shelling into Afghanistan

KABUL: Nato’s military force in Afghanistan has condemned cross-border shelling from Pakistan, after Kabul warned that it could significantly harm relations between the strife-torn neighbours.

Afghanistan’s warning came on Sunday after officials said more than 300 heavy artillery shells and rockets were fired from Pakistan into Afghanistan’s eastern Kunar province over two days, killing at least four people.

Last month, a barrage of cross-border fire from Pakistan into Kunar forced thousands of villagers to flee their homes after Islamabad accused Kabul of protecting militants who infiltrated to kill 13 Pakistani soldiers.

Afghanistan and Pakistan typically blame each other for violence by Taliban militants plaguing both sides of their border, known as the Durand Line.

Nato’s International Security Assistance Force “condemns the indirect fire attacks from across the Durand Line”, Isaf said in a statement late Wednesday.

“We continue to work with the Afghan ministry of defence, and the Pakistan government to ensure an end of these attacks.”

Isaf welcomed the announcement by the Afghan foreign ministry that talks on the issue would be held soon between officials from both sides in Afghanistan’s eastern city of Jalalabad.

Pakistan on Sunday denied Afghanistan’s charge of cross-border shelling, calling it “incorrect”.

“Pakistani troops only respond to and engage militants from where they are attacked/fired upon,” said a senior military official in Islamabad.

Over the last year he said at least 15 cross-border attacks were carried out by militants against Pakistani check points and the civilian populations in northwestern towns of Dir and Chitral.

Nato has some 130,000 US-led troops in Afghanistan helping the government of President Hamid Karzai fight Taliban insurgents.
 
Misquoting a reference is a grossly unethical act.

The correct article is as follows:

from: Nato condemns cross-border shelling into Afghanistan | DAWN.COM

There are inaccuracies in the article from dawn which have been corrected and re-posted , there is is nothing unethical about that. The editors at newspapers do the same , the orignal drafts are edited before publishing

On the general question of ethics then United States should not lecture others given that they have done far more unethical things that all of humanity combined; from conducting nuclear strikes on civilians , to conducting STD tests on inmates , to genocide of an entire people in the American continent, selling lies about WMD in Iraq and not the least for being responsible for thousands of deaths around the world due to a dubious event that took place on sept 11 2001.
The list of unethical behaviour emanating from the US is way too long so just shut up and don’t give me lectures about ethics
 
What nonsense is this? GROSS MISQUOTING! Absolute baloney!

The mods need to please ban the OP for this nonsensical twaddle he has written. And then in order to defend himself he goes on to say:

"There are inaccuracies in the article from dawn which have been corrected and re-posted , there is is nothing unethical about that. The editors at newspapers do the same , the orignal drafts are edited before publishing."

Bullsh!t!! Can he produce the so called uncorrected original article? Dawn News is not some internet tabloid that they'll post such unedited junk.

Jeeez! The standard of PDF is sure going South! :tdown:
 
What nonsense is this? GROSS MISQUOTING! Absolute baloney!

The mods need to please ban the OP for this nonsensical twaddle he has written. And then in order to defend himself he goes on to say:

"There are inaccuracies in the article from dawn which have been corrected and re-posted , there is is nothing unethical about that. The editors at newspapers do the same , the orignal drafts are edited before publishing."

Bullsh!t!! Can he produce the so called uncorrected original article? Dawn News is not some internet tabloid that they'll post such unedited junk.

Jeeez! The standard of PDF is sure going South! :tdown:


Plenty of content on Dawn is tabloid , most of the crap written by Nadeem Fruitcake Paracha that you indians love to lap up , is nothing more than tabloid.

With so many indians doing rounds on all thread the standard of PDF is bound to go south , indians will turn PDF another bharat bak bak type forum.
 
Changing news, faking things, not the first time. Remember wiki leaks, the media did it as well.
 
Is it me or others laughed at ISAF spoke person words as quoted by the OP.....:lol:

Come with logical posts not presenting Zaid type conspiracy.
 
The ISAF spokesperson couldn’t hold back his pain after seeing the newly trained dogs of the Americans getting smothered with artillery, hence the truth came out of his mouth
 
The ISAF spokesperson couldn’t hold back his pain after seeing the newly trained dogs of the Americans getting smothered with artillery, hence the truth came out of his mouth

How can you portray the "truth" on someone else's behalf, by "misquoting" (in other words, lying) yourself?
 
Is it me or others laughed at ISAF spoke person words as quoted by the OP.....:lol:

Come with logical posts not presenting Zaid type conspiracy.

FACT: More than 100 militants crossed over from Afghansitan to attack Pakistan , NATO/US remained quiet
FACT: The ANA attacked a check post inside Pakistan , NATO/US remained quiet
FACT: Pakistan retaliated against threats originating from Afghanstain , NATO/US condemned Pakistan's act of self defence.
FACT: NATO/US refuse to acknowledge or mention presence of Fazlullah wing of TTP indside afghansitan whom they are obviously supporting.

These are fact which cannot be washed off no matter how much washing the ganga dins try to do for their master in this regard ;)
 
Is it me or others laughed at ISAF spoke person words as quoted by the OP.....:lol:

Come with logical posts not presenting Zaid type conspiracy.

When reality is not so palatable, people incapable of debating with facts find refuge in fantasies such as OP ;)
 
Even when presented with facts , ganga dins still try to pour water over the miss doing of their master :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom