What's new

US/NATO condemn Pakistan's right to defend itself

According to IMF Pak lost 80 billion US dollars due to trade and other losses since 9/11 -
Reference, please.

and the money US gave is atleats 10 times less than that and includes reimbursement to army for its expenses against militants under CSF.Rest most of the money was channeled through US favored NGO's...with its networking US always knew where each and every penny is gonna end up.
Money leaves the U.S. for Pakistan under many auspices: private funds, public funds, NGOs, and World Bank/IMF. Money control isn't something the U.S. exercises so easily - something crooked Pakistanis are quick to take advantage of. (Control over physical equipment has proved a bit easier.)

Yeah and what would you say about your nation that depiste labeling herself a GOD fearing christian nation allowed church of satan -
Thank you, but I wasn't asking for an illustration.

I guess its high time for americans to realize that they are now up against a different Pakistan.People who knows very well what US is and what it wants.
Pakistanis are grossly misinformed. Here is an example of a Pakistani ex-FM who writes for ET but had to find out about post-9/11 international law from his commenters: link It shouldn't be that way, don't you agree?
 
Agree on strategic objectives with Afghanistan and the coalition and establish a combined operational command with authority to work both sides of the border. Worked very well in WWII with the Brits and Americans.

I have to say thats a phenomenal idea. This will avoid any blue on blue incidents and will enable both sides to work together to cut of ingress/egress of Taliban. The question is whether both sides will be willing to put their egos aside and hammer out a deal.
 
The question is whether both sides will be willing to put their egos aside and hammer out a deal.
That would be a start but since the days of Z.A.B. and Zia to the present U.S. trust of Pakistani leaders' promises has plummeted into the toilet. Once, in a disagreement over Afghanistan, Zia claimed that "a Muslim may lie in a good cause." That's what the U.S. has to watch out for; that's why if Pakistan wants a mutual solution it is Pakistan that must bend over backwards to accommodate others.
 
Dear Safriz,

We must realize that this is not a one sided issue. The problem exists on both sides of the border. We want our readers to know that this issue is not being overlooked, and the recent rise in the cross border attacks have been the subject of discussion between our governments. Let’s keep in mind that these terrorists have a common mission of destabilizing the region. These attacks aim to spread chaos and fear among the people, and create hurdles in our way of bringing peace and stability to the region. We reiterate what ISAF said in regard to the circumstances surrounding the cross border attacks. “We have many shared interests – including our respective commitments for coordinated action against the cross-border attacks of the Haqqani terrorists from North Waziristan who threaten Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the region; of supporting Afghanistan’s security, stability, and efforts towards reconciliation; and of continuing to work together to advance the many other shared interests we have, from increasing trade and investment to strengthening our people-to-people ties. We are committed to working together with Pakistan on these issues, and others, on the basis of mutual interest and respect. We should pursue a relationship that is enduring, strategic, carefully defined, and that enhances the security and prosperity of the region.”

LTC Taylor,
DET, United States Central Command
U.S. Central Command

Just One Question !

Your Drone can see 4 or 5 Militants in NW But why cant they see hundreds of Militants in Kunar or Noristan ?
Hypocrisy ? Why your forces lift those areas ? Why no Operation there from NATO or ANA ?
 
If Americans support drone-strikes into Pakistani territory in the name of defence, then Pakistan has every right to do the same and defend itself with strikes across the Line.
 
Back
Top Bottom