What's new

US might strike in Pakistan:White House

Time is passing out for Pakistan due to the wrong and US dictated policies of Musharraf. At this point the govt of Pakistan must act tough in best interest of Pakistan and oppose firmly any aerial or ground attack from US or NATO forces. Despite all the weaknesses we must believe firmly in Allah and take bold steps. US with all its might is not able to touch Iran and Iranian leadership is firmly standing with the help of God.

Painting US as evil and then evoking the thoughts of Allah to justify it hallmark of a loser.

US said it will bomb targets in Pakistan, ok now thats deplorable. But then Pakistan has good relations with US and can use that to convince US to act as its deemed necessary but zip up the mouth. Meaning let them pass out aerial attacks as PAF sorties and save the face as long as the ones getting killed are wanted guys.

Im sure nobody wants to live under these barbarians in the 21st century.
 
.
Why should we be doing things US wants us to do? Let US go to hell. After doing so much for this ******* wot what have we gained in it, Unrest in tribal areas, Cutting of the american aid or attaching it with our action against millitants, US ready to bomb us, nuclear collaboration with india. We have lost so much and yet they repay us with all of this crap of theres then why not let them go to hell and tell them to do wht ever they wna do and we will defend our country till the last drop of blood in every pakistani. They treat us like we are some employess of their, work well get paid well. Fuk them these bastards
 
.
Why should we be doing things US wants us to do? Let US go to hell. After doing so much for this ******* wot what have we gained in it, Unrest in tribal areas, Cutting of the american aid or attaching it with our action against millitants, US ready to bomb us, nuclear collaboration with india. We have lost so much and yet they repay us with all of this crap of theres then why not let them go to hell and tell them to do wht ever they wna do and we will defend our country till the last drop of blood in every pakistani. They treat us like we are some employess of their, work well get paid well. Fuk them these bastards

Lol dont be so frustrated dude. Your polticians and army chiefs ( Presidents) are to be blamed.
 
. .
The interesting part is that most nations in the world thinks the US should go to hell.

And yet they go back to the US.

It is like a Moth that is attracted to Flame!

A very funny phenomenon actually!
 
.
Well the U.S will invade our airspace no matter what we tell them. When they think there is a terrorist presence sumwhere in pakistan they don't take the time to tell Pakistan, they just send sum forsaken stealth bomber to bomb that place. This article proves that such events have happened in the past but unforunately information is not easily found about them. Even NATO violates our borders.

“I don’t remember any other incident in which Nato forces fired across the border and civilians died”

By Umer Farooq


— Major-General Waheed Arshad, director-general, Inter-Services Public Relations

Q. In two separate incidents, Pakistan’s borders were violated by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) forces. One took place in Shawal Valley in South Waziristan, on which you commented, and a second in Tor Zawar near Angoor Adda, where reportedly US B-52 bombers hit mud houses and 22 people were killed. Why did you not comment on the second incident?
A. There was only one incident. People don’t visit the tribal areas when reporting the events. A few reporters were saying that an incident took place in South Waziristan while others were saying that it happened in North Waziristan. Actually the area is located on the border of South and North Waziristan and it is called Mangratay in Shawal Valley. It is close to the Afghan border where the rockets of the coalition forces hit houses and a hotel located in the area.



I also recall an event when a U.S B2 bomber attacked Dera Ismael Khan and bf4 dat in sum sindhi village in pakistan. It came in the news 2 i guess...
 
. .
IS THE US PREPARING TO ATTACK PAKISTAN?


The Bush Administration may be preparing to lash out at old ally Pakistan, which Washington now blames for its humiliating failures to crush al-Qaida, capture its elusive leaders, or defeat Taliban resistance forces in Afghanistan.

One is immediately reminded of the Vietnam War when the Pentagon, unable to defeat North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong forces, urged invasion of Cambodia.

Sources in Washington say the Pentagon is drawing up plans to attack Pakistan’s `autonomous’ tribal region bordering Afghanistan. Limited `hot pursuit’ ground incursions by US forces based in Afghanistan, intensive air attacks, and special forces raids into Pakistan’s autonomous tribal region are being evaluated.

This weekend, the US national intelligence chief and other intelligence spokesmen confirmed that strikes against `terrorist targets’ in Pakistan’s tribal belt are increasingly possible. These warnings were designed to both further pressure Pakistan’s beleaguered strongman, President Pervez Musharraf into sending more troops to the tribal areas to fight his own people, and to prepare US public opinion for a possible widening of the Afghanistan war into Pakistan.

Pakistan’s 27,200 sq km tribal belt, officially known as the Federal Autonomous Tribal Area, or FATA, is home to 3.3 million Pashtun tribesmen. It has become a safe haven for al-Qaida, Taliban, other Afghan resistance groups, and a hotbed of anti-American activity, thanks mostly to the US-led occupation of Afghanistan which drove many militants across the border into Pakistan. Osama bin Laden is very likely sheltered in this region, as US intelligence claims.

I spent a remarkable time in this wild, medieval region during the 1980’s and 90’s, traveling alone where even Pakistani government officials dared not go, visiting the tribes of Waziristan, Orakzai, Khyber, Chitral, and Kurram, and meeting their chiefs, called `maliks.’

These tribal belts are always referred to as`lawless.’ Pashtun tribesmen could shoot you if they didn’t like your looks. Rudyard Kipling warned British Imperial soldiers over a century ago, when fighting cruel, ferocious Pashtun warriors of the Afridi clan, if they fell wounded, `save your last bullet for yourself.’

But there is law: the traditional Pashtun tribal code, Pashtunwali, that strictly governs behavior and personal honor. Protecting guests was sacred. I was captivated by this majestic mountain region and wrote of it extensively in my book, `War at the Top of the World.’

The 40 million Pashtun – called `Pathan’ by the British – are the world’s largest tribal group. Imperial Britain divided them by an artificial border, the Durand Line, which went on to become, like so many other British colonial boundaries, today’s Afghanistan-Pakistan border. When Pakistan was created in 1947, the Pashtun were split between that new nation and Afghanistan.

Pakistan’s Pashtun number 28-30 million, plus an additional 2.5 million refugees from Afghanistan. Pashtuns, one of the British Indian Army’s famed `martial races,’ occupy many senior positions in Pakistan’s military, intelligence service and bureaucracy, and naturally have much sympathy for their embattled tribal cousins in Afghanistan. The 15 million Pashtun of Afghanistan form that nation’s largest ethnic group and just under half the population.

The tribal agency’s Pashtun reluctantly joined newly-created Pakistan in 1947 under express constitutional guarantee of total autonomy and a ban on Pakistani troops ever entering there.

But under intense US pressure, President Pervez Musharraf violated Pakistan’s constitution by sending 80,000 federal troops to fight the region’s tribes, killing 3,000 of them. In best British imperial tradition, Washington pays Musharraf $100 million monthly to rent his sepoys (native soldiers) to fight Pashtun tribesmen. As a result, Pakistan is fast edging towards civil war, as the bloody siege of Islamabad’s Red Mosque and a current wave of bombings across the nation show.

The anti-communist Taliban movement is part of the Pashtun people. Taliban fighters move across the artificial Pakistan-Afghanistan border, to borrow a Maoism, like fish through the sea. Osama bin Laden is a hero in the region, and likely shelters there.

The US just increased its reward for bin Laden to $50 million and plans to shower $750 million on the tribal region in an effort to buy loyalty. Bush/Cheney & Co. do not understand that while they can rent President Musharraf’s government in Islamabad, many Pashtun value personal honor far more than money, and cannot be bought. That is likely why bin Laden has not yet been betrayed.

Any US attack on Pakistan would be a catastrophic mistake. First, air and ground assaults will succeed only in widening the anti-US war and merging it with Afghanistan’s resistance to western occupation. US forces are already too over-stretched to get involved in yet another little war.

Second, Pakistan’s army officers who refuse to be bought may resist a US attack on their homeland, and overthrow the man who allowed it, Gen. Musharraf. A US attack would sharply raise the threat of anti-US extremists seizing control of strategic Pakistan and marginalize those seeking return to democratic government.

Third, a US attack on the tribal areas could re-ignite the old irredentist movement to reunite Pashtun parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan into independent state, `Pashtunistan.’ That could begin unravelling fragile Pakistan, leaving its nuclear arsenal up for grabs, and India tempted to intervene.

The US military has grown used to attacking small, weak nations like Grenada, Panama, and Iraq. Pakistan, with 163 million people, and a poorly equipped but very tough 550,000-man army, will offer no easy victories. Those Bush Administration officials who foolishly advocate attacking Pakistan are playing with fire.

Copyright Eric S. Margolis 2007
http://www.ericmargolis.com/archives/2007/07/is_the_us_prepa.php
 
.
Bush criticises talk of US strike on Pakistan

Reuters, Islamabad

US President George W. Bush on Friday described the prospect of U.S. strikes against al Qaeda in Pakistan as "unsavory," saying Washington respected its ally's sovereignty, the Pakistani government said.

It said Bush made the comments to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in a telephone call to congratulate Pakistanis ahead of the 60th anniversary of their independence on Aug. 14.

Bush's comments followed a statement by Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama this week that the United States must be willing to strike al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan, a view Bush himself had earlier publicly espoused.

A Pakistani Foreign Ministry statement said, "President Bush stated that the United States fully respected Pakistan's sovereignty and appreciated Pakistan's resolve in fighting al Qaeda and other terrorist elements.

"He (Bush) said that such statements were unsavory and often prompted by political considerations in an environment of electioneering," the statement added, without making direct reference to Obama.

http://nation.ittefaq.com/new/get.php?d=07/08/05/w/n_zqmk
 
.
Bush is in a corner.

He cannot abandon Pakistan.

And anyway, it is Cheney, the US Rasputin, who decides how the wind shall blow!
 
.
Us has always abandon pakistan in the past and surely it can do now, they are alreay planning to strike on targets without pakistans approval. As bush is concerned, if hes so favoured of pakistan then he should had not sign the bill of cutting of aid to pakistan and linking it to pakistans act against militants. He could have easily veto the damn thing like he did in case of withdrawl of american troops from iraq.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom