What's new

US Imposes Visa Sanctions On Pakistan For Refusing To Take Back Deportees

WASHINGTON: The United States has imposed sanctions on Pakistan after it refused to take back its citizen deportees and visa over-stayers from America, warning that it might withhold visas of Pakistanis beginning from its senior officials.

The State Department on Friday said consular operations in Pakistan remain "unchanged" as of now but as a result of such a sanction mentioned in a Federal Register notification dated April 22, the US might withhold visas of Pakistani nationals.

Pakistan is the latest to join the list of 10 nations that have been imposed with sanctions under a US law according to which countries refusing to take back deportees and visa over-stayers will be denied American visas.

The other countries include Ghana, Guyana in 2001, the Gambia in 2016, Cambodia, Eritrea, Guinea, and Sierra Leone in 2017, Burma and Laos in 2018.

Under Section 243 (d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Secretary of State is required to discontinue granting immigration or non-immigrant visas to a nation upon receiving notice from the Homeland Security Secretary that the country has denied or is unreasonably delaying accepting a citizen, subject, national or resident of that country.

The State Department tried to downplay the impact of the sanctions on Pakistan.

"Consular operations in Pakistan remain unchanged," a State Department Spokesperson said. "This is a bilateral issue of ongoing discussion between the US and Pakistani governments and we are not going to get into the specifics at this time," the spokesperson added.

"For some countries, sanctions begin by targeting officials who work in the ministries responsible for accepting the return of that country's nationals with escalation scenarios that target family members of those officials and potentially officials of other ministries and then other categories of applicants if initial sanctions do not prove effective at encouraging greater cooperation on removals by the targeted government," the US State Department federal register notification said.

Former Pakistan Ambassador to the US, Hussain Haqqani, said this will make things difficult for Pakistanis.

"This measure will create hardship for Pakistanis who want or need to travel to the US and could have been avoided if Pakistani authorities had not ignored American requests to respect their legal requirements for deportation," Mr Haqqani said, days after the federal register notification.

He said Pakistan's refusal to accept it's citizen deported from the US is not new.


"Pakistan's refusal to accept every Pakistani citizen deported from the US is not new. It seems that the US is no longer willing to overlook a wide range of official Pakistani behaviour. Bonhomie has been replaced by sanctions and restrictions based on Islamabad's policy decisions," Mr Haqqani said.

While the law in this regard has been under existence since 1996, it is only in last several years that there had been increasing demand from lawmakers towards its enforcement against countries that had refused to accept deportees and visa over-stayers.

In the last few years, India has been taking such deportees on special planes at regular intervals.

The Trump administration after coming to power had said it will strictly enforce such provisions under the law.

While section 243 (d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act was used only twice before 2017, the Trump Administration has been effective in using this provision on many countries, including Pakistan.

However, the State Department federal register notification indicates that the number of visa denials under this sanction is far less.

Since the law was modified to cover non-immigrant visas in 1996, 318 visa applicants have been affected, the notification said.

"During this same time period, tens of millions of aliens have received non-immigrant visas including, collectively, millions of applicants from the 10 countries affected," the notification said.

COMMENT
The Federal Register notification said that there is no set formula, though, notably the US has never issued a blanket refusal for visas from the countries in question.
Link
Hit them back with ban as well..USA must know this is different Pakistan
 
. .
Sir, you need urgent eye checkup done....

This rule is largely technical in nature and conforms a narrow aspect of the Department's visa regulations to the law. The current regulation requires consular officers either to grant or deny every visa application; however, the law requires consular officers to take a different action, i.e., discontinue granting visas, when a country has been sanctioned for denying or delaying accepting one or more of its nationals subject to a final order of removal from the United States. This rule will modify the current regulation to reflect this option for consular officers to discontinue granting visas to individuals in sanctioned countries.

Thats the first paragraph on that page under the title "SUMMARY"




LOLz, for global world Pakistan visa means nothing...Infact many country looks at person with suspicion if has a Pakistan Visa on in his passport :P
That is Indian visa..
 
.
Pakistan could also refuse visa to Americans likes of Christine Fair and other officials. There are many foreign citizens especially Afghans that have obtained Pakistani passport through bribes and illegal means. Pakistan has refused to accept individuals being deported holding Pakistani passports from USA and Europe that cannot prove their residency in Pakistan. Why should Pakistan accept Afghan citizens holding illegally obtained Pakistani passports ?
 
.
Pakistan could also refuse visa to Americans likes of Christine Fair and other officials. There are many foreign citizens especially Afghans that have obtained Pakistani passport through bribes and illegal means. Pakistan has refused to accept individuals being deported holding Pakistani passports from USA and Europe that cannot prove their residency in Pakistan. Why should Pakistan accept Afghan citizens holding illegally obtained Pakistani passports ?

Yes that is very likely. It is the Afghans probably abusing this as well. There was the thread on Turkey immigration too and it was consensus that most of the ‘Pakistani’ immigrant were just Afghan refugees.

They need to be sent back to Afghanistan before they cause more problems!
 
.
Pakistan could also refuse visa to Americans likes of Christine Fair and other officials. There are many foreign citizens especially Afghans that have obtained Pakistani passport through bribes and illegal means. Pakistan has refused to accept individuals being deported holding Pakistani passports from USA and Europe that cannot prove their residency in Pakistan. Why should Pakistan accept Afghan citizens holding illegally obtained Pakistani passports ?

Because its Pakistan's fault they issued them Passport. And if it was illegally obtained then it questions many more things on Pakistan's Passports. If Pakistan proves it was obtained illegally then all the Pakistani Passport holders become questionable. Making the life of others pakistani a lot more questionable and unreasonable.
 
.
.... then all the Pakistani Passport holders become questionable....

Only those being deported to Pakistan will have to be double checked before Pakistan accepts them. The bureaucracy need to be more vigilant and more safe guards must be implemented to stop the foreign citizens from obtaining Pakistani passports. There could be one weak link in the process that accepts the bribes and approves the passport to these individuals.
 
.
its a good thing now Pakistan can ask them to reduce the size of their embassy
 
.
My bad but where does it say visa with held? or it is because of deportees?

BTW Pakistan softened visa policy for 48 countries and USA & India are NOT among those
I am not sure why RSA is not on the list either; it was a nightmare many years back to get visa applied and i landed up throwing the application in the bin following the circles given.

Still remains on my wish list to visit in a couple of years.

https://visa.nadra.gov.pk/tourist-friendly-countriestfc/

This shows only 3 countries. where are the rest listed?
 
Last edited:
.
This is a security measure by Pakistan and it has refused to accept anybody as Pakistan unless Pakistan knows they are Pakistanis. Not any Tom, Dick Harry, Kulbhushan or Abhinandans can be accepted into Pakistan because USA thinks they are Pakistanis.

There has been a security risk because of such non-identified people. More than USA, Pakistan worries its own security. USA has not lost 70,000 people to terrorism, Pakistan has.

Security measures should have taken before issuing the passport.
Once you have issued the passport and if its not fake, then you cannot claim that they are not Pakistan Nationals.
 
.
I am not sure why RSA is not on the list either; it was a nightmare many years back to get visa applied and i landed up throwing the application in the bin following the circles given.

Still remains on my wish list to visit in a couple of years.

https://visa.nadra.gov.pk/tourist-friendly-countriestfc/

This shows only 3 countries. where are the rest listed?
I heard about 48 countries while USA, UK and India are not include but SA should be included. I think it will take some time because our bureaucracy is too slow.. and there are many idiots & corrupt there so there can be some deliberate omissions.

LOLz, for global world Pakistan visa means nothing...Infact many country looks at person with suspicion if has a Pakistan Visa on in his passport :P
What is global world ? sir you need a good English teacher
 
.
Security measures should have taken before issuing the passport. Once you have issued the passport and if its not fake, then you cannot claim that they are not Pakistan Nationals.

There are better ways to confirm identity of a person, more than a "legitimate passport" ever can. Pakistan may disappoint India or USA for not listening to them but they've taken the country out of terrorism because of their hard work and they haven't stopped doing it. You can have faith, defenders of Pakistan as well on the guard.
 
.
I heard about 48 countries while USA, UK and India are not include but SA should be included. I think it will take some time because our bureaucracy is too slow.. and there are many idiots & corrupt there so there can be some deliberate omissions.


What is global world ? sir you need a good English teacher
yes that is what surprised me; botswana is on the list so is Zambia, Tanzania.
 
. .
What is global world ? sir you need a good English teacher
Thanks for pointing out, its typo error, i meant "For world, Pakistan visa means nothing" . I hope this helps.
Also english is not my first language, so please pardon me if I have errors in making correct statements. I hope you will be considerate.

There are better ways to confirm identity of a person, more than a "legitimate passport" ever can. Pakistan may disappoint India or USA for not listening to them but they've taken the country out of terrorism because of their hard work and they haven't stopped doing it. You can have faith, defenders of Pakistan as well on the guard.

In international travels, the legitimacy starts from Passport. And there is a reason why Passports are issued by govt of a country and are accepted as word of truth by others.

Today if you deny Passport validity, which is to be based on some govt id, some local address proof and some police verification process. That means your country cannot be trusted on anything. Not sure why a country would like to create mockery of its system. If that is true, then for safety of USA, it has all rights to deny the visa as they cannot trust pakistan government issued passport as true identity of applicant. And thats what above sanctions mean indirectly.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom