What's new

US encourages Israel-Arab alliance against Iran

LOL! 'Projection' is quite obvious in your reply. It is you who are Jewish, arent you?
Oh, and since you ask me to "Freud" you and you've mentioned "projection" then maybe this paper might help, though it is mostly based on Palestinians and "culturally similar Arab-Muslim Islamists". Here's an extract:

...in individualistic Western societies, the affected individual may rebel against family and society, frequently with criminality. More rarely, with a different personality configuration, he may join a terrorist group and become collectivized therein.[54] In Arab society, because of its strongly collectivist and patriarchal nature, the individual characteristically does not criminally act out against the mores of family and society. Instead, the buried emotions of childhood trauma are handled by the psychological defense mechanism of splitting, whereby antagonistic feelings toward the parent, and toward the individual himself, continue as a dammed-up source of predominantly subconscious anger. Later, this is discharged by projection outward onto a socially endorsed target-in this case, Jews and Israel.

An eminent Palestinian psychiatrist noted the authoritarian upbringing and harsh disciplining of children in Gaza for even an incorrect answer in school. He suggested that children of the First Intifada were rebelling not only against the actions of the “invading Israeli army” but also displacing onto Israelis their repressed anger at the harsh circumstances of their daily life.[55]

The first few years of infantile development are pivotal in determining the baby’s self-esteem and his future personality. No mother is perfect,[56] but if she is a “good-enough mother”[57] the baby will incorporate predominantly good memories. With seriously defective or abusive mothering, or with harsh paternal abuse, the child will be negatively influenced, lose basic trust in one or both parents, withdraw emotionally from them and from others, and come to trust only himself, losing empathy with others and possibly becoming capable of great cruelty.

Concomitantly, he experiences severe anxiety and rage. But since he cannot yet accurately localize these painful feelings, they are translated by a postulated, primitive, punitive superego (or early “conscience”)[58] into self-blame, followed by poor self-esteem. He either sinks into apathy or compensates by developing fantasies of self-grandeur. For this, and to maintain trust in himself, he needs and demands constant reassurance in the form of admiration and attention. Thus evolves the pathological narcissist, or at its worst the malignant narcissist who, if charismatic, intelligent, and articulate, may become a ruthless authoritarian leader.

Recent research utilizing new brain-imaging and other techniques indicates that previously severely abused children, due to abnormal stress hormone production, suffer abnormal brain development affecting nerve centers that regulate memory, emotions, and behavior, including aggression. These findings appear to link child abuse, consequent aberrant brain development, and ensuing psychological, emotional, and behavioral consequences.[59]

The most important psychological mechanism alleviating the painfully damaged psyche is the abovementioned splitting,[60] whereby the good and bad internal representations are split off from each other. The intensely negative representations of self and parent, having been split off and rendered unconscious, are displaced, by the well-known defense mechanism of projection, onto others toward whom the individual is caused to feel hatred.[61]

Thus the emerging leader is enabled to become grandiose and feel omnipotent. But because of associated split-off fear he blames and scapegoats the other, considering himself and his cause “the victim,” thereby manifesting early paranoia that accompanies the projective mechanism. Refusing to accept responsibility, he even perpetrates atrocities against the “other.”...
 
Oh, and since you ask me to "Freud" you, and you've mentioned "projection" then maybe this paper might help, though it is mostly based on Palestinians and "culturally similar Arab-Muslim Islamists". Here's an extract:

...in individualistic Western societies, the affected individual may rebel against family and society, frequently with criminality. More rarely, with a different personality configuration, he may join a terrorist group and become collectivized therein.[54] In Arab society, because of its strongly collectivist and patriarchal nature, the individual characteristically does not criminally act out against the mores of family and society. Instead, the buried emotions of childhood trauma are handled by the psychological defense mechanism of splitting, whereby antagonistic feelings toward the parent, and toward the individual himself, continue as a dammed-up source of predominantly subconscious anger. Later, this is discharged by projection outward onto a socially endorsed target-in this case, Jews and Israel.

An eminent Palestinian psychiatrist noted the authoritarian upbringing and harsh disciplining of children in Gaza for even an incorrect answer in school. He suggested that children of the First Intifada were rebelling not only against the actions of the “invading Israeli army” but also displacing onto Israelis their repressed anger at the harsh circumstances of their daily life.[55]



The first few years of infantile development are pivotal in determining the baby’s self-esteem and his future personality. No mother is perfect,[56] but if she is a “good-enough mother”[57] the baby will incorporate predominantly good memories. With seriously defective or abusive mothering, or with harsh paternal abuse, the child will be negatively influenced, lose basic trust in one or both parents, withdraw emotionally from them and from others, and come to trust only himself, losing empathy with others and possibly becoming capable of great cruelty.

Concomitantly, he experiences severe anxiety and rage. But since he cannot yet accurately localize these painful feelings, they are translated by a postulated, primitive, punitive superego (or early “conscience”)[58] into self-blame, followed by poor self-esteem. He either sinks into apathy or compensates by developing fantasies of self-grandeur. For this, and to maintain trust in himself, he needs and demands constant reassurance in the form of admiration and attention. Thus evolves the pathological narcissist, or at its worst the malignant narcissist who, if charismatic, intelligent, and articulate, may become a ruthless authoritarian leader.

Recent research utilizing new brain-imaging and other techniques indicates that previously severely abused children, due to abnormal stress hormone production, suffer abnormal brain development affecting nerve centers that regulate memory, emotions, and behavior, including aggression. These findings appear to link child abuse, consequent aberrant brain development, and ensuing psychological, emotional, and behavioral consequences.[59]

The most important psychological mechanism alleviating the painfully damaged psyche is the abovementioned splitting,[60] whereby the good and bad internal representations are split off from each other. The intensely negative representations of self and parent, having been split off and rendered unconscious, are displaced, by the well-known defense mechanism of projection, onto others toward whom the individual is caused to feel hatred.[61]

Thus the emerging leader is enabled to become grandiose and feel omnipotent. But because of associated split-off fear he blames and scapegoats the other, considering himself and his cause “the victim,” thereby manifesting early paranoia that accompanies the projective mechanism. Refusing to accept responsibility, he even perpetrates atrocities against the “other.”...


I didnt read a word of that. Neither will I. I know how you guys operate. Word play? Semantics? The World is waking up to your game. God Bless Steve Bannon. LOL!
 
As if the Middle East needs more problems than it already has. The only countries in the Arab world that actually have a problem with Iran would be the GCC countries. Old rivalry, bad blood. Iranians and the Gulf Arabs should bury the hatchet and instead focus on helping Palestine attain the statehood it deserves.

Sweden has done more for Palestine than these 2 parties have. How ironic
 
Welcome to politics. Religion, ethnicity and culture do not matter. Only interests matter.
 
As if the Middle East needs more problems than it already has. The only countries in the Arab world that actually have a problem with Iran would be the GCC countries. Old rivalry, bad blood. Iranians and the Gulf Arabs should bury the hatchet and instead focus on helping Palestine attain the statehood it deserves.

Sweden has done more for Palestine than these 2 parties have. How ironic

Both the Arabs and Iranians have too much pride and are all full of themselves. The Arabs want to resurrect their Arab empire and the Iranians are after their own Persian empire past. Both of them aren't working for Islam rather for their own egotistical desires.
 
Both the Arabs and Iranians have too much pride and are all full of themselves. The Arabs want to resurrect their Arab empire and the Iranians are after their own Persian empire past. Both of them aren't working for Islam rather for their own egotistical desires.
This applies to virtually all Muslim nationalities around the world, not just the Arabs and Persians.

Most Muslims are supercilious even though they've contributed little or nothing to modern human civilization.
 
Both the Arabs and Iranians have too much pride and are all full of themselves. The Arabs want to resurrect their Arab empire and the Iranians are after their own Persian empire past. Both of them aren't working for Islam rather for their own egotistical desires.

DITTO
 
This applies to virtually all Muslim nationalities around the world, not just the Arabs and Persians.

Most Muslims are supercilious even though they've contributed little or nothing to modern human civilization.

Of course all Muslim nationalities all around the world are proud of their heritage but when you go overboard on it and obsess over it till the point that you are willing to destabilize other nations without having any regard for human life then that's when the problem occurs. It's a little more with the Iranians than the Arabs in terms of obsessing over their heritage but the Arabs are still very far up there.
 
Of course all Muslim nationalities all around the world are proud of their heritage but when you go overboard on it and obsess over it till the point that you are willing to destabilize other nations without having any regard for human life then that's when the problem occurs. It's a little more with the Iranians than the Arabs in terms of obsessing over their heritage but the Arabs are still very far up there.
In my opinion, most Muslim nationalities go overboard, not just Arabs and Persians.

The Turks go overboard as well, and so do Afghans.

To be honest, this problem is widespread in the Muslim World.

And the irony is that they have nothing to be proud of. Honestly, they've contributed almost nothing to modern human civilization.
 
In my opinion, most Muslim nationalities go overboard, not just Arabs and Persians.

The Turks go overboard as well, and so do Afghans.

To be honest, this problem is widespread in the Muslim World.

And the irony is that they have nothing to be proud of. Honestly, they've contributed almost nothing to modern human civilization.
their pride is what's in the past that's the thing.
 
their pride is what's in the past that's the thing.
I fully agree.

Frankly speaking I don't care about the past. I care about the present and the future. It's a pity that most Muslims long for the past even though the past doesn't even culturally represent them. (I mean, let's face it, most of the Muslims longing for the past would hate it if they knew what life was actually like.)

Look at Finland. It doesn't have a glorious past, but it's one of the best countries in the world today. That's what matters.
 
I fully agree.

Frankly speaking I don't care about the past. I care about the present and the future. It's a pity that most Muslims long for the past even though the past doesn't even culturally represent them. (I mean, let's face it, most of the Muslims longing for the past would hate it if they knew what life was actually like.)

Look at Finland. It doesn't have a glorious past, but it's one of the best countries in the world today. That's what matters.
Finland is more nationalist than Turkey.
 

Back
Top Bottom