What's new

US Drops a Bomb Every 12 Minutes on Someone ~ 24/7/365

Absolutely not!!
Do you think i approve of the bombing by ISIS or Taliban or any US allies or the Russians or the Indians or anyone?? Do you? o_O And if you dont, why or how can you approve of Americans doing it.

This is not even war, this is indiscriminate bombing of civilians and militants alike, killing people by thousands but hey,, who is counting!!

Disapproval of bombing is fine on a moral level, but it is merely policy by other means according to international geopolitics. One must understand the difference.
 
.
Disapproval of bombing is fine on a moral level, but it is merely policy by other means according to international geopolitics. One must understand the difference.
So you think that POLICY to bomb all those people to death is fine enough? Again, what have happened to the progressive shining beacons of humanity of the west? :D
 
.
So you think that POLICY to bomb all those people to death is fine enough? Again, what have happened to the progressive shining beacons of humanity of the west? :D

War, and associated tactics, are an integral part of international geopolitics pursued by all, as and when needed. It really is as simple as that, no more, and no less.

Such decisions are never made lightly by anyone.
 
. .
Yes, it is.


Then tell the militants to dress like soldiers. Then there would be no problems of discrimination. I think the Geneva Convention said something about that.
Ok, should i ask the kids to wear something different as well since the well trained soldiers apparently are FAILING to differentiate between militants and kids, for last two decades or so.

Please, stop trying to justify what you yourself KNOW is wrong only because its your men doing it.

War, and associated tactics, are an integral part of international geopolitics pursued by all, as and when needed. It really is as simple as that, no more, and no less.
That was deep. But not what i was asking!! :)
So you think that POLICY to bomb all those people to death is fine enough? Again, what have happened to the progressive shining beacons of humanity of the west? :D
 
.
Ok, should i ask the kids to wear something different...
What the hell does the kids have to do with this? Just ask the militants. Is that so hard?

..as well since the well trained soldiers apparently are FAILING to differentiate between militants and kids, for last two decades or so.
Well trained soldiers are trained to fight against other soldiers, not against militants who dressed like civilians. But of course, since you never served, you would not know, would you?
 
.
What the hell does the kids have to do with this? Just ask the militants. Is that so hard?
EXACTLY!! So why no remorse on killing them by thousands?

Well trained soldiers are trained to fight against other soldiers, not against militants who dressed like civilians. But of course, since you never served, you would not know, would you?
You dont have to serve to have humanity SIR!
Whats wrong is wrong and one should be able to see it, with or without having served in armed forces.
 
.
That was deep. But not what i was asking!

You mean this:

"So you think that POLICY to bomb all those people to death is fine enough?

As far as I am aware, there is no such policy for bombing civilians in existence by any nation currently in any conflict around the world, so your question above is based on an erroneous premise.
 
.
You mean this:

"So you think that POLICY to bomb all those people to death is fine enough?

As far as I am aware, there is no such policy for bombing civilians in existence by any nation currently in any conflict around the world, so your question above is based on an erroneous premise.
Oh no no,, i meant this:

War, and associated tactics, are an integral part of international geopolitics pursued by all, as and when needed. It really is as simple as that, no more, and no less.

Such decisions are never made lightly by anyone.


In reference to;
Disapproval of bombing is fine on a moral level, but it is merely policy by other means according to international geopolitics. One must understand the difference.
 
. .
Oh muhtarim janabe-wala, please read the entire phrase: "it is merely policy by other means according to international geopolitics" - referring to Clausewitz's famous definition of war, which obviously escaped you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_von_Clausewitz
Sir it didn't escaped me, but it goes like, War as a continuation of POLITICS!!! Not policy! So when you call it policy, it will surely be surprising for people like me especially when it comes from people like you, the soldiers of a progressive, moderate and tolerant society. :)
 
.
Sir it didn't escaped me, but it goes like, War as a continuation of POLITICS!!! Not policy! So when you call it policy, it will surely be surprising for people like me especially when it comes from people like you, the soldiers of a progressive, moderate and tolerant society. :)

I did NOT call it policy. Clausewitz did. :D
 
.
I did NOT call it policy. Clausewitz did. :D
POLITICS!!! He called it Politics, continuation of politics by other means. Policy tu "saab bahadur" na bnaa le ha!

BTW, using Carl von Clausewitz to defend or define American war policy was,,,,, Ironic? Yes Ironic would be the word.
 
.
POLITICS!!! He called it Politics, continuation of politics by other means. Policy tu "saab bahadur" na bnaa le ha!

Different sources have used both words, politics, and policy, Sire.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom