US concerned about human rights situation in Azad Kashmir

[Hellfire]

We don't need the land, we are not after the land. We are after settling of this issue and then everybody lives in peace.

Missed this actually.

It is, at the end of the day, about securing water sources. Let us be honest and blunt. That is the only thing that matters.

For us, it is about pluralism of India, for you it is about water first and foremost and ideological state second. If, perhaps, Pakistan would declare itself as a secular state, it just might not settle kashmir as water security is the crux.

Anyways .. just a perspective.

Thanks

see you around

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

The US is concerned about human rights situation in the Azad Kashmir
HIGHLIGHTS

• The US is concerned about human rights situation in the Azad Kashmir
• US said it had always urged Pakistan to work out differences in its region peacefully
  
• It said that Pakistan was well aware of the US policy on the Kashmir issue.

WASHINGTON: The US is concerned about human rights situation in thePakistan-occupied Kashmir and the country's Balochistan province, the State Department has said.

US State Department spokesperson Mark C Toner on Tuesday said the US was concerned about the " human rights situation " there and had "reported it for several years in our Human Rights Report".

He made the remarks while responding to a question about Pakistan Army's oppression in Pakistan-held Kashmir and Balochistan , during a press briefing here.

http://m.timesofindia.com/world/sou...akistan-held-Kashmir/articleshow/53840897.cms

indian news papers and electronic media always listen to what they really want to.
these are the exact word. no where he mentioned human right violations in pakistan occupied kashmir. he talked about political differences among political parties which shows he was refering to recent elections and karachi situation. and he mentioned kashmir at the end seperately the word with respect to clearly shows he is now talking about other issue, which shows his earlier part was not about kashmir.

MR TONER: Sure. Well, I would respectfully beg to differ. We do have concerns about the human rights situation there, have reported it for several years in our Human Rights Report, and we’ve obviously – are always urging all parties in Pakistan to work out their differences peaceably and through a valid political process. And with respect to Kashmir, our policy there is well known.

First handle ur Baluchistan keyboard warrior...

miilion protestors demanding intervention in balochistan mostly indians.

but is india ready to listen about 31 independence movements and insurgence groups in india by pakistan at UN forum?

 

[Army research]

The message to pakistan is very simple. Take the following steps

1. Stop everything what we accuse you off. And let us stop whatever you accuse us off. Whatever if it exists
2. Stop involving irrelevant third parties.
   
3. Come on the negotiation table bilaterally. No third party.
   
4. Now here is tricky part. You want kashmir. Ok good. Thumbs up. What then what you have to offer in return? Offer us something as good as that will help let go Kashmir, If not why would we leave Kashmir for you? Give you clear silk route, give you taps for your water. You want it for free. we also know very well you dont give a sh!t about kashmirs except it gives you a moral high ground.
   
5. if point three fails go back to 1 and continue the BS. Keep blaming each other nothing is going to solve.

How long do you think you can opress a

indian news papers and electronic media always listen to what they really want to.
these are the exact word. no where he mentioned human right violations in pakistan occupied kashmir. he talked about political differences among political parties which shows he was refering to recent elections and karachi situation. and he mentioned kashmir at the end seperately the word with respect to clearly shows he is now talking about other issue, which shows his earlier part was not about kashmir.

MR TONER: Sure. Well, I would respectfully beg to differ. We do have concerns about the human rights situation there, have reported it for several years in our Human Rights Report, and we’ve obviously – are always urging all parties in Pakistan to work out their differences peaceably and through a valid political process. And with respect to Kashmir, our policy there is well known.


miilion protestors demanding intervention in balochistan mostly indians.

but is india ready to listen about 31 independence movements and insurgence groups in india by pakistan at UN forum?

There faces look Indian ugh fudge this this thread is like a couple of aunties gossip bye

 

[sohailbutt1987]

Welcome and have a look for yourself!