What's new

US biggest ‘threat’ to China, says top Chinese military expert

We only know the fact that

Italy is one of the Egiht Nation Alliance which invaded China in 1900s.

Italy was one of the Eight Nation Alliance that invaded China in 1900s, but beyond the 8 there were other smaller players. For example, the USA feeling excluded in the bountiful "hunt" wanted a piece of Chinese flesh, and so got involved later on.
 
Italy was one of the Eight Nation Alliance that invaded China in 1900s, but beyond the 8 there were other smaller players. For example, the USA feeling excluded in the bountiful "hunt" wanted a piece of Chinese flesh, and so got involved later on.
Such as? Name one US colonial outpost in mainland China that is equivalent to European ones.
 
Such as? Name one US colonial outpost in mainland China that is equivalent to European ones.

there were at least 2 , 1 in shanghai and another in Tianjin, they weren't as numerous or as large but the fact remains, they were there.
 
although britain was one of the worst and most brutal european powers, they at least got 1 thing right: they recognized PRC fast, within a few months.
 
i agree that the u.s. is the biggest threat to china and the world. if the world wants peace, stability and an end to cia terorism, then they need to prop china up. this also goes for india. i know that indians have a problem with china, but you best put your differences aside for now to get rid of the biggest threat to human rights (usa)
take a look at this video if you want to see how america gets down.
[video=google;-8085945499556832271]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8085945499556832271[/video]
 
Source please.

delivered
search for American in the pages

China foreign colonies

^^ the american concession in tianjin was not formal it was administered under the British but the us kept a permanent garrison there.

Treaty Ports and Foreign Concessions in China - 1921-22

Shanghai Old Concession Areas,Shanghai Old French Concession,Travel Shanghai - China Fact Tours

^^shanghai concession though was more official

China - Extraterritoriality

^^ on Extraterritoriality given to(take by) foreigners with a focus on the us experience in the middle of page
(where the us spokes person at the time basically said white Christians are better than everyone else and such right should be international law)
 
delivered
search for American in the pages

China foreign colonies

^^ the american concession in tianjin was not formal it was administered under the British but the us kept a permanent garrison there.

Treaty Ports and Foreign Concessions in China - 1921-22

Shanghai Old Concession Areas,Shanghai Old French Concession,Travel Shanghai - China Fact Tours

^^shanghai concession though was more official

China - Extraterritoriality

^^ on Extraterritoriality given to(take by) foreigners with a focus on the us experience in the middle of page
(where the us spokes person at the time basically said white Christians are better than everyone else and such right should be international law)
In other words, since you cannot find any US interests in mainland China that would stand alongside European colonial interests so you have to expand the context of 'colonialism' to its absurd.
 
In other words, since you cannot find any US interests in mainland China that would stand alongside European colonial interests so you have to expand the context of 'colonialism' to its absurd.

no sir you are absurd,did you even read the sources?
it is a fact the us kept a permanent military force in Tianjin even though it is not officially a concession, are you saying the us didnt have interests in china at that time? and i have never said it was on the scale of the Europeans such as Britain

add to that the shanghai concession was official

and the Extraterritoriality rights were a part of the unequal treaties

i have expanded nothing

you on the other hand seem to claim that forcefully taking concessions and claiming extraterritorial right all the while claiming that the white Cristian is superior to all other races is not part of the imperial expansionist part of the European colonial period.

also do i even need to mention the us was a part of the eight-nation alliance against china? at the end of which the unequal boxer protocol treaty of 1901 was signed ,is that not "colonialism"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom