What's new

US 6th gen fighter NGAD to be "dominant"; to cost multiple hundreds of millions per aircraft; to field by early 2030s: SecAF Kendall

. .
You should really adjust the title, which gives an impression that it dominates the cost.
 
. . .
Well its going to pack a lot of exquisite bleeding edge technology. That costs a lot of money.
Yes, but maybe it shouldn’t and instead take an evolutionary approach to adding it on.
 
.
Yes, but maybe it shouldn’t and instead take an evolutionary approach to adding it on.


Entire US military strategy revolves around US dominance of the aerospace. A dominant air superiority fighter is imperative for the DoD.
 
.
Entire US military strategy revolves around US dominance of the aerospace. A dominant air superiority fighter is imperative for the DoD.
I would have thought that the VKS disaster in Ukraine made that redundant to repeat. But let them criticize, for starter, they have no frame of reference as we are so far ahead. Let them use the failed Russian airpower model and the unknown Chinese airpower model to criticize US. At this point, I do not care. :lol:
 
.

I would have thought that the VKS disaster in Ukraine made that redundant to repeat. But let them criticize, for starter, they have no frame of reference as we are so far ahead. Let them use the failed Russian airpower model and the unknown Chinese airpower model to criticize US. At this point, I do not care. :lol:


The US Air Force is leaving everyone behind. By 2030 the USAF will have well over 1,000+ F-35s in inventory, B-21 bombers will be rolling off the production line, and 6th Gen NGAD will be coming online.
 
.
Entire US military strategy revolves around US dominance of the aerospace. A dominant air superiority fighter is imperative for the DoD.
That has nothing to do with management of technology. Technically the F-22+ F-35 dominates pretty much everyone except the Chinese. The NGAD can follow basic Pareto and still be completely dominant over anything the Chinese roll out by 2060.

I would have thought that the VKS disaster in Ukraine made that redundant to repeat. But let them criticize, for starter, they have no frame of reference as we are so far ahead. Let them use the failed Russian airpower model and the unknown Chinese airpower model to criticize US. At this point, I do not care. :lol:
Who is them?
 
. .
See post 2.
Me as an American citizen questioning why we need additional costly tech( that inevitably leads to delays) when we already dominate the shit out of any of the threats leads you to make some troll post?

I am not against NGAD, I questioned the need for doing the F-35 approach of shoving everything and anything in the aircraft when even 50% will keep any future threat at bay.
 
.
So prototype roll out would be in 2025-2027.
 
.
Probably above 200 million USD a piece. This will put developing countries with their 4th gen fighters completely out of race to compete in air warfare. China is the only country that can offset this kind of advanced tech.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom