Update: Indian troops killed soldier after questioning: Pakistan Army

[karan.1970]

English is not the issue, issue is indians killed a soldier who was mistakenly strayed and addmitted and did not commit any aggression. Indians took his arms, interviewed him and then killed him in cold blood. This is sheer and cold blooded agression on human being.

Unless proven, the allegation above is little more than a nonsensical rant..

You indians murder people and now you want to bargain to cover indian crime with what someone else did somewhere else? That is a pathetic show simple human decency.

.......

 

[KRAIT]

How does they know about conversation ?

 

[Areesh]

Well compare my posts with yours.. your posts is full of hatred.... I can see who is increasing post.... my bad to reply some one who got brainwashed...

What else do you expect hatred when I know my soldier was killed in cold blood.

Can't complain if they do. It is sad if he(this particular Pakistani soldier) was just lost but the circumstances of the recent past does not give much room for such types of errors.

Indian Army is well within its rights to kill any Pakistani soldier found on Indian side.. Period.... As is Pakistani army ..

Fine. Fair enough.

 

[KS]

Well obviously Pak Army is lying.

 

[haviZsultan]

He was shot at point blank range on the forehead. That sounds like fun for our Indian colleagues. He should have been escorted back the border.

Some mechanism really has to be developed to end this. And Indians are just too trigger-happy.

 

[KS]

Well the news is that he was shot after he was questioned. All the Indian claims about he returned the fire goes down the drain.

Indian has accepted the fact that its soldiers fired first.

India continues to violate international laws and these acts are nothing new. See the BD events for example where civilians are dragged from BD to India and murdered.

LOL funny logic. Pakistan soldier crosses the LoC and Indian troops did their job. This automatically becomes violation of internatianal laws. No the only international violation was that of the Pak soldier crossing into India.

And ISPR's can claim all they want. To us they mean nilch in this case. Unless proof is given that he was indeed questioned, then it remains only a claim and a brainwashing attempt on poor pakistanis.

 

[haviZsultan]

There is a lack of response from the Pakistani side.

 

[KS]

He was shot at point blank range on the forehead. That sounds like fun for our Indian colleagues. He should have been escorted back the border.

Some mechanism really has to be developed to end this. And Indians are just too trigger-happy.

Trigger happy because of recent border violation of your soldiers and beheading an Indian soldier. If that had not happened,I sure this guy would have been sent home if he had identified himself as a Pakistani soldier and that he mistakenly crossed into India.

Oh and I dont buy for a second the pak army claim that he was questioned. How can they know that ? were they watching him all the time ?

 

[haviZsultan]

LOL funny logic. Pakistan soldier crosses the LoC and Indian troops did their job. This automatically becomes violation of internatianal laws. No the only international violation was that of the Pak soldier crossing into India.

And ISPR's can claim all they want. To us they mean nilch in this case. Unless proof is given that he was indeed questioned, then it remains only a claim and a brainwashing attempt on poor pakistanis.

Didn't you say ISPR figures are worth more than the figures by anyone else? Now why don't you believe the ISPR version of events when they say something useful?

 

[KS]

There is a lack of response from the Pakistani side.

Because our soldiers did not cross the border 'mistakenly'. Duh.

 

[rockstarIN]

Trigger happy because of recent border violation of your soldiers and beheading an Indian soldier. If that had not happened,I sure this guy would have been sent home if he had identified himself as a Pakistani soldier and that he mistakenly crossed into India.

Oh and I dont buy for a second the pak army claim that he was questioned. How can they know that ? were they watching him all the time ?

Which locals from either side saw that he was questioning? If the locals can 'see' clearly the Indian post from other side, he would not have lost the way.

 

[Jango]

Gone through that but it seems to be ambiguous as
How PA came to know about soldier has crossed LOC?
How 2 soldiers of IA got injured?

Because some civilians reported so.

Don't you think some rational thinking is missing here?

Rational thinking was also missing in the beheading fiasco. You people had no iota of proof for that.

Not Pakistani army. How did they know he was questioned ? Did they see it ?

Civilians on Indian side saw it, they saw him being taken away by Indian soldiers. As I have said before, go through the whole article rather than skimming through it.

 

[haviZsultan]

Huh kid. That was believable because they are the only ones who can actually release those figures and presenting those figures had no apparent benefot except for information purpose. Actually armies dont do that. But the fact they did shows they saw the need to counter some mis-information being spread.

But in this case, a soldier crossed into India with no knowledge on either his side or his armies side. it is the Indians who know what happened. Not ISPR.

Get the diffference ?

This is hilarious. When you qoute 1980's ethnic composition and incorrect statistics ISPR is involved. I confirmed that was up till 1990 at most. Now when the ISPR says a soldier was shot at point blank range by a country that has lost sense you say ISPR cannot be believed. What brilliant logic.

Hypocricy knows no bounds does it. Only thing is you are tireless... which is good since you are best when you are involved in e-war's.

 

[KS]

Because some civilians reported so.

.

Some random civilians..how convenient.

 

[karan.1970]

Some random civilians..how convenient.

Could be the ones belonging to charitable organizations like JuD and its affiliates..

He was shot at point blank range on the forehead.

This is based on what? Did the civilians in question saw that too?