What's new

Unusual increase in assets of PTI ministers in last few years

Status
Not open for further replies.
Man when such articles are posted, I actually start to believe that PTI ministers must not be corrupt. Either that or PML-N investigative journalists are lazy.
 
.
If someone has done something illegal take them to court and prosecute them.

We are not Patwari or Jiyalas - we are Pakistani first. We know the names of our fathers.
 
.
Why samaa genius investigation team not releasing the report of aleem khan assets he was also with PTI lol
 
.
Captain's team, money making machine!
150% to 300% increase in assets of 12 ministers!!

Shah Mehmood Qureshi 214%
Shafqat Mahmood 308%
Sheikh Rashid 282%
Khusro Mukhtiar 127%
Fehmida Mirza 152%
Omer Ayub 203%







View attachment 843543

View attachment 843542

Saama is owned by Aleem Khan right ? Maybe that's why lotas and Aleem are not on the list.


Anyways this is same script as Noorani (maybe it was done by him). They are showing increase in income to imply there was corruption done but no proof of corruptions are shown. He did same with Asim Bajwa and IK.


Secondly why no show increase for PPP and PMLN?

This is just beginning.
If this is the beginning then kar bethe oo tussi.


Chullu bhar pani lelo bahi.

Ishaq Dar has same kind of case for assets.
Possessing assets beyond known sources of income is same kind as "increase" in asset value? Since when ?
 
.
So the PTI government came into power on 17 Aug 2018.

You mean to tell me Sh Rashid did so much corruption in just 4 months that he increased his wealth by 100 billion?

Or are the figures of tax returns, which means it would be of the tax year?

And the guy did corruption of 100 billion the first year, but then remained quiet us kay bad?

Moreover, Farah Khan is accused of increasing her wealth by 70 billion in 4 years. It pales in comparison to Sh Rashid, to is ko pakro na aur inquiry karao.



His assets actually were highest in 2015, when PTI wasn't even in power. They then decreased and still haven't gone back to that level. Moreover, would be interesting to see the actual breakdown of assets and income rather than only a lump sum. How much of that increase came from his sugar business, and how much came otherwise.

And finally, why are all graphs ending at 2019? Extend them to the final year of PTI so that the trend gets clear. Or did the assets and income of these people decrease after 2019 and that doesn't suit the narrative, hence the omission?

Also, why do some graphs show only 2013 and 2019? Why not the years in between? If it was a gradual geometric progression of the wealth from 2013 to 2019 of Fehmida Mirza rather than a sudden jump, then an increase of around double is nothing. I know people who earned 5 times the money in the same period, and they have nothing to do with government, only real estate.

As someone who works with data for a living, I know how selective use and interpretation of data can be used to get all sorts of results according to your narrative.

I hope someone answers these questions with facts rather than rhetoric.

The investigation by the journalist was started in 2020 and report was prepared after one year, he tried to contact all minsters repeatedly for their stance before filing the story, some of them gave some explanation most of them didn't answer the questions.
 
. .
Journalists got data from FBR
Where increases in assets are voluntarily declared by the person himself
Why would anyone declare something from black money?
If there is something they own and didn't declared than they should face court
 
.
Feel free to take the PTI politicians to court.

We dont perform sajda on our leaders like patwaris.
 
.
Desperate attempts to attack PTI by liars, thieves and corrupt media personalities.

Thread closed for raising absurd and unsubstantiated claims to further propaganda by a corrupt and foreign backed PMLN+PPP+MQM (and the rest of the PDM circus) government.
 
.
The investigation by the journalist was started in 2020 and report was prepared after one year, he tried to contact all minsters repeatedly for their stance before filing the story, some of them gave some explanation most of them didn't answer the questions.

That means this whole report is bogus.

You just take 1 year in isolation and declare it as a fact?
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom