What's new

Ungrateful Nation

Seriously fight F-15,AC-130 and Apache using 12.7 when attackers were attacking from save distance.
Institution is silent over here nations matters here.

Taliban are fighting even with lesser resources then us.

The nation is not to be blamed if those trained to fight don't fight.

Are you sure F-15 and AC-130 were involved.
 
.
Taliban are fighting even with lesser resources then us.

The nation is not to be blamed if those trained to fight don't fight.

Are you sure F-15 and AC-130 were involved.
Taliban have suffered heavy due to air power.
Yes,various sources have reported it.
 
.
Taliban have suffered heavy due to air power.
Yes,various sources have reported it.

The point is not the casualties but the will to fight. Your post suggested they did not fight.

Please quote a source stating F-15 and AC-130 were used.
 
.
The point is not the casualties but the will to fight. Your post suggested they did not fight.

Please quote a source stating F-15 and AC-130 were used.
Hahahaha will to fight a source of attack which you can't reach with any possible weapon you have, is itself a joke.
Go through them.
https://web.archive.org/web/2011122...r-fire-pakistan-attack-sources-134017538.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/29/nato-bombing-pakistani-military-base
https://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/80616338?access_key=key-26rt0xtpw7icq41c5zat
 
.
Even if one agree to your claim of error it still could not justified NATO forces going back to Finish the Job when they were informed.

Was the information provided sufficient to explain how a particular location became the source of the incoming fire? How would commanders in the field know that that a particular location had not been taken over by hostiles?
 
.
Was the information provided sufficient to explain how a particular location became the source of the incoming fire? How would commanders in the field know that that a particular location had not been taken over by hostiles?
Your Logic don't hold. Your country knowingly invade our airspace targeted our post once conveyed its our post its SOP to disengage rather then that they come back to Martyr remaining soldier.

And why not you quote your shameless western media that when NATO Heli invade our Airspace and Targeted our post soldier there fired back. As they should remain idle.

Pls ask yourself these simple question
1> the effective range of 12.7mm????
2> distace b/w NATO Force and the Post?????
3> If supposedly NATO was unaware that they don't have long range weapon then why Heli maintained safe distance while engaging?????
4> Once it was established that Post belong to Pakistan and you are inside Pakistan(although they already know) then why they come back to engage remaining survival???????
 
.
Your Logic don't hold. Your country knowingly invade our airspace targeted our post once conveyed its our post its SOP to disengage rather then that they come back to Martyr remaining soldier.

And why not you quote your shameless western media that when NATO Heli invade our Airspace and Targeted our post soldier there fired back. As they should remain idle.

Pls ask yourself these simple question
1> the effective range of 12.7mm????
2> distace b/w NATO Force and the Post?????
3> If supposedly NATO was unaware that they don't have long range weapon then why Heli maintained safe distance while engaging?????
4> Once it was established that Post belong to Pakistan and you are inside Pakistan(although they already know) then why they come back to engage remaining survival???????

Please answer the two questions I asked first. Where did the initial fire come from? And why, if the location was a recognized post? This should answer your questions too.
 
.
Please answer the two questions I asked first. Where did the initial fire come from? And why, if the location was a recognized post? This should answer your questions too.
Not from our side that our official statement. its your country who accused us.
So its your job to prove that 12.7 mm can effectively engage NATO location.


If its justified according to your logic then you would not have mind if Pakistan Air Force has engage those Heli because they not only violated our space but also martyr our soldiers????
&
why US come to the rescue of TTP(at the request of Kabul Govt.) when our forces were engaging them using artillery strike in Afghanistan because of their continuous attacks.

you talk about investigation and can't answer my simple 4 question.

You invade our airspace and martyr our soldiers
Should it be Pakistan or US who need to Answer the position?????????


If your US investigation report didn't answer these basic four question then its noting more then horse shit.

In the End you invade our airspace & martyr our mans & we did nothing & you can't support your story with Facts so move on.
 
.
Was the information provided sufficient to explain how a particular location became the source of the incoming fire? How would commanders in the field know that that a particular location had not been taken over by hostiles?
Good Joke so we did engaged Ac-130 and F-15 using 12.7 mm HMG.

MC-12W Liberty intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft is capable of knowing this.
 
.
Not from our side that our official statement. its your country who accused us.
So its your job to prove that 12.7 mm can effectively engage NATO location.


If its justified according to your logic then you would not have mind if Pakistan Air Force has engage those Heli because they not only violated our space but also martyr our soldiers????
&
why US come to the rescue of TTP(at the request of Kabul Govt.) when our forces were engaging them using artillery strike in Afghanistan because of their continuous attacks.

you talk about investigation and can't answer my simple 4 question.

You invade our airspace and martyr our soldiers
Should it be Pakistan or US who need to Answer the position?????????


If your US investigation report didn't answer these basic four question then its noting more then horse shit.

In the End you invade our airspace & martyr our mans & we did nothing & you can't support your story with Facts so move on.

If Pakistan responded with all tools at its disposal, I would simply regard that as being logical and perfectly within its rights as a sovereign nation. Of course!

Please see below too.

Good Joke so we did engaged Ac-130 and F-15 using 12.7 mm HMG.

MC-12W Liberty intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft is capable of knowing this.

How would they know whose finger is on the trigger?
 
.
Sir can you share the approximate distance b/w Pakistan Post and alleged site where NATO was doing operation.
sorry its been a while and I have lost the full documentation detailing the full trail of events exact location of both posts their men and equipment and the distance of the post to the border and distance of the Afghan village to the border etc. I will have to look for it or seek help.

Hi,

The Salala incidence proved my brother right---. He had told Musharraf not to promote him---'Kiyani has no guts'---Mush did not listen to him even though he was close to Mush.
that Kyani guy is hated so much within the army I had no clue.
 
.

Two of your sources do not open.

Normally border posts have sufficient means of engaging threats that are perceived to attack them.

What is surprising is that the helicopters reengaged the troops and we still were not able to counter them effectively.
 
.
Two of your sources do not open.

Normally border posts have sufficient means of engaging threats that are perceived to attack them.

What is surprising is that the helicopters reengaged the troops and we still were not able to counter them effectively.
There were no AA weapons on Western border.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom