56- Nassar Closed Gulf of Aqaba
You're very misinformed on this subject, first of all, the Suez Canal belongs to Egypt. The British-French colonialists wanted to dominate the canal and aid the enemies of Egypt through that. Egypt had legitimate economical, sovereign, and national security concerns.
Nassar wanted to nationalize his canal, the British-French didn't want this even though he offered full economic cooperation. So the Eisenhower administration went to propose a diplomatic solution which offered shared control and once again was rejected by the European colonialists.
Later they along with Israel launched an attack on Egypt without the US being aware of such plans. This outraged the US but also was an act of aggression.
67- If Israel didn't strike the Arabs would have. Your probably pissed that Israel was more cunning
This has no truth to it, nothing was indicating that. It's the opposite, Egypt had gotten intelligence that an imminent Israeli attack was on the way so they moved their forces to the Sinai which alone weren't capable of launching an offensive war. Israel had plans to occupy certain territories as noted before the war. The Arabs had their weapons and aircraft grounded, meaning no such preparations for a war against Israel were taking place, therefore Israel committed a war of aggression.
80-90s- PLO cross border attacks into Israel?
Was legitimate inside the West Bank to remove the occupying power. However, for Lebanon I didn't agree with their whole strategy.
Look you have to admit, there are a$$holes on both sides of the fence.
Both sides made mistakes, including the Palestinians, however the overall issue is centered on one aspect. That is the land grabbing policy of Israel.
You got Hamas and Fatah more concerned about fighting each other. Israeli zealots attacking peaceful protesting Palestinians vice versa.
As far as I know the Palestinians are united and will have a national technocratic government within a week:
Rockets & Bombs killing innocent people. Whats the point to argue? Its a cycle of violence.
Actually, there is a cycle of land grabbing and Israeli assaults on the Gaza Strip, not to mention the active siege of Gaza which is an act of war. The Palestinians in the Gaza Strip only defend their selves through a deterrence with what they have, rockets. No acts of violence take place except when Israel invades the border or when it commits assassinations. There isn't a cycle of violence, there's Israeli politics and resource grabbing of offshore gas. And Gaza makes a tiny portion of Palestine.
Look at the West Bank, it speaks for itself, the active ongoing Israeli policy sees no end until the world makes something out of it and Israel is pressured to end its occupation which will pave way for peace for decades.
For example in 1973, 2 Israeli brigades were surprise attacked by 20 Syrian brigades.
Later Israeli force increased to 10 brigades while Syrian side increased to 24 brigades.
.
1973 was a war to regain Egyptian and Syrian land back which Israel occupied since the 1967 war of aggression.