Uncovering Ilyas Khan: BBC Editor cum Political Coadjutor of PTM.

[Mahmood-ur-Rehman]

Ilyas Khan Politically Linked to PTM? : His twitter Agrees

06/07/2019

View attachment 563946

Since the journalists have become holy cows, willing and equipped to fully exploit the post-truth era to further their own narratives, affiliations, and beliefs. A journalist is an intellectually dishonest person who instinctively knows what to censor and what to publish. In the quest for truth, it is important to understand and know the personal beliefs, political affiliation and past commitments of a journalist who's is deliberately and systematically trying to sell you something. We have been following the commentary by Farangi state-owned media like BBC and VOA pertaining to PTM; their pet project to destabilize Pakistan by activating ethnolinguistic faultlines. Recently a report by the British state-owned broadcaster BBC created a stir.

It was submitted by one of its editors, M. Ilyas Khan who alleged human rights abuses by Pakistan's Military during counter-terrorism operations. Although it is crystal clear to the reader that the report itself is a purpose-built fabrication, created by the BBC editor with the help of PTM activists to enforce their false victimhood narrative, it is still important to take a look at the past commentary by Ilyas Khan. We mined his twitter account for his personal opinions on the issue and found a plethora of evidence which is sufficient to prove that the said editor is politically affiliated with PTM. Having looked at the records, it is clear that his personal beliefs could have influenced the outcome of his reporting.

It is also clear that before he went on to uncover the alleged abuses, Mr editor had already made up his mind. The result of his article, we believe was preconceived. I am sharing the list of tweets I have found on his profile with the forum audience so everyone can debate and draw their own conclusion as to whether Ilyas Khan was acting as a reporter or a politically partisan activist.



View attachment 563924 View attachment 563925 View attachment 563926 View attachment 563927 View attachment 563928 View attachment 563929

BBC is definitely a propaganda tool for western to fulfill their own design

 

[Sine Nomine]

Stop derailing the thread .

Stop asking stupid Questions and making false assumptions filled with bravado.

 

[war&peace]

Stop asking stupid Questions and making false assumptions filled with bravado.

The topic of BBC and its support for PTM. Should we not stick to the topic?

 

[Sine Nomine]

The topic of BBC and its support for PTM. Should we not stick to the topic?

It's useless to even talk about BBC,we can't even tame jurnos barking in own state at state,how we gonna stop BBC.

 

[war&peace]

It's useless to even talk about BBC,we can't even tame jurnos barking in own state at state,how we gonna stop BBC.

At least we can discuss it on PDF and pressure the lazy govt & state to take an action against them...

 

[Sine Nomine]

At least we can discuss it on PDF and pressure the lazy govt & state to take an action against them...

So,what actions we should take?

 

[war&peace]

So,what actions we should take?

Please read my first post on this thread ... I've made suggestions there and in subsequent posts

 

[MystryMan]

AN 32's in IAF are not very well maintained and they even lost 5 during repairs in Ukraine.

How that happened?

 

[Sine Nomine]

How that happened?

During civil war i guess,i read somewhere that they were found in another hanger later.
Latley Both parties have resumed contract.

 

[PDF]

The correct counter approach to the British subversion would be for the ISI to develop links with Irish unionists, Scottish separatists, Welsh separatists, and Argentina. Pakistan should sell anti-ship cruise missiles to Argentina among other equipment which would greatly help Argentina tip the balance of power, to free Islas Malvinas from British occupation in the future. The British are providing refuge to terrorists like Harbiyar Marri, Altaf Hussain, Mehran Marri and others like them as well as economic terrorists like Ishaq Dar, Sharifs. We are done begging the British to "take action", it is time to talk to the British in a language they will understand and will respond to.

We can't do sh*t about them. Or politicians and generals don't have the ba*ls for even speaking up openly.
The better approach would be to send/hire kill teams towards our enemies abroad.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

There is no way BBC would have not known the political affiliation and agenda of this chap before giving him coverage. You cannot blatantly give space to individuals with clear agenda against Pakistan and its state institutions. Journalism demand that the write up should have involved non biased individual even when the ultimate goal was to defame state of Pakistan. BBC didn't even do that. Pointing fingers at state institutions and through that, on state itself, its a red line which should not have been crossed but it has unfortunately. Now consequences should follow.

 

[SIPRA]

Pakistan is, by and large, on its own. We need to strengthen ourselves economically and technologically. Rest would follow. Currently, we are not in a position to impose our will.

 

[MM_Haider]

BBC needs ads .. Till we don't up our collective intelligentsia to have English news channels of International standard.. we need to give lots of ads to BBC.. the day we do this BBC will seize to publish such crap from such carp journalists..

https://twitter.com/x/status/1135834057374339072

https://twitter.com/x/status/1135834603787358208

 

[MOHAMMED Zaheer Majid]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1136655044256907264

 

[SIPRA]

As far as I can recall, since at least 1970 onward, BBC has ever been pro-India and anti-Pakistan, in its narrative and stance. So, it is nothing new.