So, we are looking at jets that are anywhere between 13 - 30 years old, refurbishments notwithstanding. Would you mind sharing the actual operating costs if you have them? What is the mean failure rate of critical components? On Wikipedia (yes, you'll laugh, us ordinary denizens of the world don't have access to shiny military journals) it is noted that the Taiwanese jets developed cracks in the engine blades. It further notes that the maintenance costs have been higher than F-16. Interestingly, these Taiwanese jets were also bought between 1997-98 and the page notes that in 2016 they have surpassed half their service life. So, if we get them 5 years later, we are looking at a planned service life of maybe 18 years at best. And that is for the new batch. So we need to look very closely at the costs that will be incurred in inducting these jets. This figure is not publicly available, but I am operating under the assumption that it will be too high to justify the value. Feel free to correct me here.
A lot of marketing buzz words used here. 'State-of-the-art', 'advanced capabilities', 'world-beating', 'highly intuitive'. The fact is that 'night-vision' is available even on our ROSE upgrades. Other than that, what advantage would this touted 'highly intuitive man-machine interface' provide over what we have today in F-17, JF-17, and even Mirage ROSE? That is something only a fighter pilot can comment who has actually flown the systems and can make an objective comparison. But, in the absence of objective data to support these buzz words, I remain a skeptic.
A lot of secrecy going on here. Does it have AESA? The RDY-2 is certainly a pulse-doppler radar. No idea what additions were specified by the UAE AF & AD.
Right. How many of these missiles will we get 5 years from now? And what will be the price of buying more? Who gives the guarantee that in times of war France won't put an embargo on us? But most importantly, would France be OK with us integrating Ra'ad nuclear capable cruise missile on them? The argument that we integrated it with the older Mirages is invalid. They might have had a very different license agreement. What are the exact terms under which we acquire these planes? Lots of unknowns.
This system has merits.
http://www.elettronica-elt-roma.com/index.php/en/mirage
But here's the rub. Pakistan has very good cooperation with Elettronica. There is no reason to believe this, or an even better system, won't be available to us for JF-17. Five years is too long to wait for this stuff.
What would it take to integrate this with our indigenous Link-17? I am talking both time and monetary costs. Would it be a good player in our network-centric warfare plans? What about integration with our upgraded AWACS systems?
FADEC will be available in JF-17 Block III if we decide to go with RD-33MK. I remember reading somewhere that WS-13 is actually based off RD-33MK. Again, I am not losing breath over this.
What would be the cost of acquiring this MRO infrastructure and relocating it to Pakistan? Now here is something that interests me. Would we gain new tools and techniques that we could then apply to the maintenance of JF-17? What objective benefits would that provide? I would be interested in knowing that.
Finally, here is the thing. There is the concept of 'Technology Curve'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_life_cycle
With the Mirage III/V acquisition, we locked ourselves to the decline phase of Mirage technology. And my biggest contention is that acquiring Mirage 2000s will lock us for the next 30 years into another decline phase. Now is our time to act with resolve, prudence, and determination, and do whatever it takes to come at the frontier of technology. There simply isn't any way to change this reality.