That's the issue here. We do not care about your social ills. You are obsessed with those exist in our society. That's the sickness of your substandard culture.
Then stop focusing on our own China. If you are obsessed with ours, we become obsessed with yours. Brawl continues forever.
Of course you do. Look at your fellow Chinese members here for fine examples. I focus on Chinese political and military issues as how they relate to foreign powers. But since you guys prefers to zero in on US social issues, we can use China for comparison.
What I posted shows clearly the inherent/built-in checks on the emergence and survival of a third party in the present US regime, which is undemocratic. The two parties have overtime built a mechanism to protect their iron grip on the people's choice.
How is it 'undemocratic' if there is no law to prevent the existence, let alone the rise, of other parties ?
Did you know that there is a communist party in the US =>
Home » cpusa .
So if we can tolerate the commies, we can certainly tolerate the Libertarians, the Socialists, and anyone else. We have a Socialist Congressman, Senator Bernie Sanders. Does China have any alternative political ideology in the Chinese legislature ? Does China even
ALLOW competing political parties ?
Given that the two parties are basically funded by the wealthy, it is indirect-fascism, at best.
Bullshit. You got no hard data to back that up. Any American can donate to any party he want, including the CPUSA. It is the burden of the political party to convince the people to fund its existence.
That you hold a circus every four year does not make your system a good one, neither does it make it superior to ours or others'.
Of course our circus is better than yours. At least we present the people with candidates.
Elections-shows are for entertainment; which Founding Fathers might not have envisioned when they crafted an elitist indirect representation.
Again...Unless you know why the US Electoral College was created in the first place, do not presume you know what the American Founding Fathers would think of today's elections.
News for you, kid...
If China was designed to be a democratic republic like the US was, her Founding Fathers would most likely insert a Chinese version of the US Electoral College.
See if you can figure out why.
If the system is rigged and compromised, then it has no value.
A lot more honest than your China.
90% Of China’s Super-Rich Want To Send Children Abroad
Western media have reported that Xi Mingze, the daughter of Xi Jinping, who is widely expected to become the new president of China and chairman of its Communist Party, is studying at Harvard University under an assumed name. (The university hasn't confirmed to the International Business Times that she indeed studies there.)
You want to see a rigged system ? Go look out the window at your China. What have little miss Jinping accomplished to earn even a speculation that she is going to inherit the Dragon Throne ? So what if the Western media is wrong ? The reason why they speculate is because your system is so rigged that such assumptions became common place throughout modern China.
Face it. You are living in a modern dynastic China.
I do not consider FPP as reflective of common good especially if the system has turned rigid and corrupted with money. Which is the case with the US.
And "at least it is better than..." statement can be discussed from various angles. If the purpose is putting up a show and a circus every some odd years, then yes, it is, at least. If the purpose is good governance, then, the rigidity and corruption inherent in the model requires a serious overhaul of the system.
It is FPTP. Like it or not, it is better with money than with bullets, of which your China is still using to control politics. So yes, our system is far superior to yours, sheeple.
