What's new

U.S. Retains Hidden Grip on Pakistan's Nukes

linkinpark

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
865
Reaction score
0
U.S. Retains Hidden Grip on Pakistan's Nukes



With Pakistan's political instability spreading, nervous concern has mounted over the fate of Islamabad's nuclear arsenal should Taliban sympathizers gain power within the Pakistan military, but under the terms of secret agreements, U.S. personnel have been stationed in Pakistan whose sole function is to guarantee and secure the safety of Islamabad's nuclear arsenal and keep it out of the hands of terrorists, according to several serving and former U.S. officials. Some of the American technicians have had direct access to the nuclear weapons themselves, these sources said.

In any case, Pakistan's nukes are currently secure, in the opinion of several former and serving U.S. officials. "They are for now," said one.

The concern over Pakistan's arsenal extends back in time, before the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. As early as 2000, the Clinton administration created a joint commission, a 'liaison' group, consisting of top American and Pakistani scientists. The purpose of this group was to help the Pakistanis create command and control codes for its nuclear weapons that would be unbreakable. One former senior U.S. intelligence source told me that in the course of such work, America gained "a pretty full knowledge" of Pakistan's command and control system.

The United States then used Special Forces 'snatch teams' to kidnap Pakistani scientists who were peddling Pakistan's nuclear technology or knowledge of it to undesirables. For example, a group of such scientists abruptly disappeared while traveling in Burma, these sources said.

In addition, the kidnappings disrupted an alleged 200 links between the Pakistani nuclear community and terrorists with ties to al-Qaida, they said. Other Pakistanis sympathetic to al-Qaida such as Sultan Bashiruddin, a much-decorated scientist in Pakistan's nuclear community, were arrested and interrogated.

The fact was that even before 9/11, U.S. intelligence had thoroughly infiltrated the nuclear smuggling ring of Pakistan's lead nuclear scientist, A.Q. Khan, without disclosing this to the government of Pakistan. The penetration proved a chief factor in Libya's abandoning its own nuclear program and why Iran, another Pakistan client, disclosed its own activities to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Vienna watchdog group.


After the 9/11 attacks, American aid to Pakistan to safeguard and secure its arsenal was drastically stepped up, with the George W. Bush administration using the proposed $3 billion U.S. aid package that included F-16s and all sorts of advanced hardware, as a bludgeon. Under U.S. pressure, within two days of the attacks, Pakistan's military began to secretly relocate critical nuclear weapons components to six new secret locations, U.S. sources said. Warheads and delivery systems, which were already being kept separated, were put even more widely apart, and additional surveillance was put on Pakistan's nuclear labs and their personnel, they said.

Additional steps were also taken to separate fissile material from the labs or the weapons themselves, they said.

More U.S. 'technical advisory' teams, many staffed by Defense Intelligence Agency or Energy Dept. intelligence officials, began to appear in Pakistan along with warning and assessment equipment.

Communications systems between Pakistani nuclear commanders and nuclear storage sites were reviewed and modernized, and certain key nodes were, at some point, on a U.S. target list, sources said.

Thanks to U.S. technical means, the United States became aware of defects and miscommunication between Pakistani military centers of command during atomic tests which helped U.S. analysts to grasp facets of Islamabad's command and control areas that were of dubious reliability.

Following 9/11, when U.S. advisors persuaded Pakistani scientists to adopt some key features that add security to U.S. nuclear command procedures, tension rose over whether to install Permission Action Links (PALs), an electronic lock that renders a weapon null and void until political commanders relinquish control of the special codes that allow the weapon to be turned on, several sources said. In addition, the weapons could not be used without employing a dual-key system, meaning that a single rogue commander could not initiate their use.

In brief, the PALs would prevent the unauthorized use of a nuclear weapon by an aberrant member of the military, and they would prevent use of such a weapon by terrorists, and therefore are important, U.S. officials said.

Yet disputes arose immediately. There were legal implications about sharing such sensitive military technology with a foreign power, and some senior U.S. officials balked at using the PALs, thinking they would give the Pakistanis too much insight into America's own nuclear war fighting system. "The Paks are smart. What they can see and examine, they can re-engineer," said one.

For their part, the Pakistanis feared that American scientists would insert a 'dead switch' into the PALs, which would freeze the weapons if someone attempted their use, similar to being able to stall a stolen car from a remote position.

There is some ground for Pakistani misgivings. For years, U.S. intelligence has infiltrated the front companies used by Iran to acquire nuclear weapons technology from the West, especially Europe. Many of these companies were originally part of the Pakistani network set up by A.Q. Khan that procured both components and information for North Korea, Libya and the like. Many are engineering consulting firms, U.S. officials said.

An atomic bomb requires enriched uranium, and to enrich uranium, machines called centrifuges are required – rapidly spinning tubes that are used to separate and concentrate isotopes in gasified uranium. Spinning at several thousand revolutions per minute, they rest on superb bearings, in perfect balance, in a vacuum, linked by pipes to thousands of other spinning units. When the process works, the gas ends up in a solid form, but any minute defect, and the product is decisively marred.

The same is true of the other equipment required: tools, magnets, exotic steel, vacuum pumps, ball bearings and instruments of all kinds, all must be perfect.

Iran uses front companies, fake end-user certificates and third-country destinations to disguise the true purpose, but according to one former senior CIA official, "We have infiltrated such companies and have been able to insert flaws into the technology that we can exploit. It goes along the line of our selling computers that have trap doors into which U.S. technicians can enter to manipulate the machine."

During the Kosovo war, NSA systems were able to make false insertions into the workings of Serb air defense radars, rendering them inoperable.

Other Iranian targets include electronic circuits, electromagnetic machines called caultrons, industrial circuits, power supplies, and compressors for window mounted air conditioners.

"The point is that when they push the button, the stuff won't work," the former senior official said.

He and others said that the operation "is fairly long-standing" and successful.

Pakistan is said to have between 25-40 strategic nuclear weapons, and Jane's Defense Weekly says Pakistan also has about 60 short-to-medium range missiles and 34 F-16s capable of delivering an atomic warhead. Islamabad exploded its first weapon in 1998.
 
I don't understand how can they keep a grip on Pakistan's nukes?

If we have to fire a nuke, we can still do it, and there's no US's OKAY needed to do so.

The rest are just safety measures which give a control to the Pakistani government over the usage of nukes. Like dual key's, authentication, etc.
 
it is very surprising that if the us had knowledge of pakistan havin nuclear program it had to enforce presseler amendments in order to restrain pakistan from countinuing its nuclear program and why did it not completly finish the program for which it nowadays suffering nuclear blackmail and it is unable to convince pakistan to abandon its nuclear assists?????????? i hope you reply to the following Q's
 
Well if USA has Control on our Nukes and they wont let us use them against India and Indian Already has Huge disparity against Pakistan in Conventional weapons then what the Hell were you waiting for after 26/11 ? Pakistani Nukes are in Pakistani Safe Hands and No one else controls them When we Intend to use them we can use them no American Permission Required.

If we can make something as sophisticated as Nuclear Weapons, cant we make something less sophisticated than nukes to safeguard our Nuclear Arsenal. Pakistani Nukes have Pakistani PALs and no American Codes, Simply because we cant rely on the American at least in this case when it comes to our survival.

Americans have shown lot of concern on the safety of our Nukes and Back at home their Nukes became vulnerable, Their Bombers were flying on American cities and were carrying Missiles with Nuclear warheads, Their Computers got stolen from their Nuclear Labs, Don't forgot the American Hydrogen Bomb lost in Seas near Spain.

This report came up in the Past as well and one of our Chief Scientist made it clear that "No Such American codes have been installed on our Nukes and we have our own Command & control system".
 
If thats the case then why didnt us of a offer pakistan a nuclear deal ? a civil nuclear deal. I doubt that us has anythign to do with Pakistani nukes.
 
Yet disputes arose immediately. There were legal implications about sharing such sensitive military technology with a foreign power, and some senior U.S. officials balked at using the PALs, thinking they would give the Pakistanis too much insight into America's own nuclear war fighting system. "The Paks are smart. What they can see and examine, they can re-engineer," said one.

So it shows Clearly that Even Americas were not willing to Give PALs Technology to Pakistan at First Place.

The United States then used Special Forces 'snatch teams' to kidnap Pakistani scientists who were peddling Pakistan's nuclear technology or knowledge of it to undesirables. For example, a group of such scientists abruptly disappeared while traveling in Burma, these sources said.

I really doubt this, Pakistan would have shown her extreme reaction to this incident if it really happened.

As Far as Pakistani Nuclear Scientists Relation with Al-Qaeda are concerned, This Happens only on Star News, Just use your common Sense If Al-Qaeda Even Gets Nukes what will they do with them? (Where they will use them On Afghan People ? because at the moment Even Pakistan doesn't have a Missile which can reach USA)

How they will use them, How they will deliver them ? (May be they can use Donkeys and Camels to Deliver WMD and to detonate a Nuke you need a proper System its not like a suicide jacket that just by the pull of wire the job will be done )
 
If thats the case then why didnt us of a offer pakistan a nuclear deal ? a civil nuclear deal. I doubt that us has anythign to do with Pakistani nukes.
I think there are certain power groups of the world, some Indian some not, who like to see a big showdown between Pakistan and India.

These are nothing but encouragements to India to take the war path since obviously Pak has no nukes so there's nothing to fear.
 
Oh yeh , asim bhai you know while i was in us some of the american defense analyst even belive that indian and pakistani nuke might even be just a hoax. They dont really have them and those nuke trial were just work of some animation software.
Anyways i doubt any sorce or coding of american origin will be done to any nuke prograqmme by pakistanis since - they really had taste of what american friendhsip is like.
But as for pakistan, Extrimism has to end, its not in its full power yet, and a strong leadership is required to pioneer the people of pakistan, and take them away from paths of killing.
BTW Indian side believe that Pakistani nuke are safe and these statements have been made many a times by officals.
Pak’s nuke weapons largely safe, says Indian NSA
 
If thats the case then why didnt us of a offer pakistan a nuclear deal ? a civil nuclear deal. I doubt that us has anythign to do with Pakistani nukes.

Sir, Americans have started playing games with you. They want to control your nukes not ours and Why? Because they don't believe you. If i am not wrong after the deal, your misinster of defence said last year. india will not do any live nuclear tests in future. and they will open some nuclear facilites for IAEA (means USA). On the other hands. Pakistan did the same deal with China. and we don't have any thing to control. we can do that.
Second thing is after getting their reactors. Americans will blackmail you in the same way as they did us in F-16s.
 
I never understood the purpose of such articles which are mostly by the way found out by our Indian fellows here, anyways a simple logic would help clear away the vague news. If pakistani nukes were even slightly under the control of the americans, and the news can be found out on the internet, first US media wouldn't be loosing sleep over nothing and second Indians would have never hesitated attacking Pakistan. Its common sense that if nukes are under the US control, why would India worry about them and bring them into every equation of theirs, every time they think they will attack Pakistan even the cold start doctrine has very clearly raised this factor. It appears that some people haven't yet washed away their wet dreams about Pakistani nuclear program going under the US control.
Nuclear program going under the US control means, we don't have a nuclear program and not having a nuclear program means death for us.
 
I do not believe this concept.

But talking about "why India did not attack Pak" is wrong. Even if USA controls Pak nukes, USA does not 'love' India. There is no guarantee that the attack won't take place.

@ mwalam

There was no such statements. The only commitment India has is "no first use of nukes". Also, the nuclear reactors going under IAEA surveillance are purely civil. These steps are taken to check proliferation. The defense reactors are free from any foreign monitoring.
 
I do not believe this concept.

But talking about "why India did not attack Pak" is wrong. Even if USA controls Pak nukes, USA does not 'love' India. There is no guarantee that the attack won't take place.

@ mwalam

There was no such statements. The only commitment India has is "no first use of nukes". Also, the nuclear reactors going under IAEA surveillance are purely civil. These steps are taken to check proliferation. The defense reactors are free from any foreign monitoring.

Well There is nothing i can say more to convince you, You Better keep believing that Pakistani Nukes are under American :usflag: Control :crazy:, You are free to Attack us and When we will Press the Nuke Button Nothing is gonna Happen at all Because Uncle SAM :usflag: took our fuses. Are you Happy now. :yahoo::yahoo:
 
I never understood the purpose of such articles which are mostly by the way found out by our Indian fellows here, anyways a simple logic would help clear away the vague news. If pakistani nukes were even slightly under the control of the americans, and the news can be found out on the internet, first US media wouldn't be loosing sleep over nothing and second Indians would have never hesitated attacking Pakistan. Its common sense that if nukes are under the US control, why would India worry about them and bring them into every equation of theirs, every time they think they will attack Pakistan even the cold start doctrine has very clearly raised this factor. It appears that some people haven't yet washed away their wet dreams about Pakistani nuclear program going under the US control.
Nuclear program going under the US control means, we don't have a nuclear program and not having a nuclear program means death for us.

Our Nuclear Program Guarantees Our Survival From all Foreign Threats and We will Just Never Compromise on Our National Security simple is that.

We can Never Trust Americans At least on this Issue, They Refused :tsk: :disagree: to Give us Spare Parts for the F-16s how can they Give us Permission to Launch nukes ? :what: :undecided:
 
Folks,

The article is all hogwash. Nobody has snatched any Pakistani scientists and the US queries about our Command and Control has been dealt with at an arm's length. After sacrificing for 30+ years, we are not about to hand over any sort of leverage to the Americans when it concerns the Pakistani strategic assets. Any American meddling in the decision making concerning the nuclear weapons will reduce the value of this deterrence. This point is not lost on the Pakistani planners. Secondly, there is an in-built suspicion in the minds of these same planners with regards to our program. I do not think they know as much as the article purports. (I am aware of the US technology and intelligence capabilities, however Pakistan is a big country and the people who are running the show are also not novices).
 
Back
Top Bottom