Two umpiring decisions might cost Bangladesh the quarter-final vs India

[Sneaker]

The first one : LBW clearly shows that the ball was pitched out side the leg stump.

Regarding Rohit sharma catch , BD should have gone for review.

Any way the match has been a one sided one except between 15th to 32nd over of Indian batting. It is not like those decisions have impacted the match result greatly.

They wasted the review on LBW... too bad..

I do not know only one review is allowed !

But if DRS is in your favor, it doesn't count.

View attachment 204436

Which part of "parody account" did you not understand?

 

[indianBong]

True, dude RAW is the best, it can change presidents, change governments, turn countries up side down, do attacks in other countries like its just another day in seconds damn

damnn.... RAW can make CIA MOSSAD look PUNNY !!

 

[suresh1773]

It's hard to win when your opponent plays with 14 players.

We r discussing about cricket & not any other sport

 

[kbd-raaf]

So much butthurt from the Bangladeshis. Makes me happy

 

[HariPrasad]

ICC Cricket World Cup 2015: Two umpiring decisions might cost Bangladesh the quarter-final vs India - Latest Cricket News, Articles & Videos at CricketCountry.com


Home › News ›
ICC Cricket World Cup 2015: Two umpiring decisions might cost Bangladesh the quarter-final vs India
Nishad Pai Vaidya
March 19, 2015, 1:58 pm

Rohit Sharma scored 137 against Bangladesh © Getty Images

Melbourne: There are always ifs and buts, but Bangladesh may consider themselves unlucky after the Indian innings in the ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 quarter-final. There were two decisions, which could have gone in their favour, and possibly turned the tide in their direction. Instead, India breathed a sigh of relief and the two batsmen went on to make a big impact on the game. If India go on to win this game, the debate about those two calls may rage on with the umpires and the Decision Review System (DRS) in focus. READ: Rohit Sharma scores 100, only behind Ricky Ponting as he sets Indian record during ICC World Cup 2015 quarter-final 2

When Suresh Raina was on 10, Mashrafe hit him in front of the stumps. The umpire did not give it out. As a result, Bangladesh went upstairs. On the first look, it seemed out as it hit him in front and the ball would have gone on to hit the stumps. They then checked with the ball trackers, which showed that the ball had marginally pitched outside the leg-stump. There was some part inside the line, but a part of it was outside. As a result, the third umpire had to back the on-field call and not overturn it. Had Raina been given out and then referred it, he would have had to head to the pavilion. READ: IND vs BAN, quarter-final 2: Rohit Sharma scores 7th ODI century

The second contentious call came in the 40th over, when Rubel Hossain bowled a high full toss to Rohit Sharma. Rohit pulled it to square-leg, where he was caught quite easily. The umpire signalled it a no-ball for height. Replays showed that it was just on the waist at the point of contact with the bat and Bangladesh could have had their man. Rohit was on 90 then and he went on to make 137. Raina survived the call on 10 and went on to get 65. Those two batsmen changed the course of the game at a time when Bangladesh were looking to restrict India. READ: CONTROVERSY! Rohit Sharma saved as Bangladesh robbed in World Cup quarter-final

Bangladesh would say that had they dismissed those batsmen, they may have had India for much lesser than 302. They now face a tall task to win the quarterfinal.

When Third umpire gave his decision after checking the video where is the question of wrong decision? In second case umpire declared it a no ball much before sharma was caught. Sharma might have hit the ball high seeing the umpire call. This is totally nonsense. You guys have lost by over hundred runs and not by 2 or 4 runs. So do not find excuses.

 

[Kesang]

Dear our sour looser friends. It will be difficult for you to understand but according to cricket rule, Umpire can't give a batsman out if Ball pitched outside leg stump.

 

[The_Sidewinder]

What's funny about 2007, you lost to a very young Bangladeshi side and got knocked out of the group-stages. Oh, wait it's funny............. for us.

yeah its funny. Fast forward 8 years India has won 1 T20 world cup, runner up , 1 ODI world cup & Icc Champions Trophy in England.

Meanwhile Bangladesh has done nothing notable with same group of players with so much experience instead of loosing & getting knocked out of group stages of each major tournament. Even this time, without the washout aussiz Bangladesh would have knocked out in group stage's this time too.

I got two words for ya, "Stuart Binny"

 

[Kinetic]

It's hard to win when your opponent plays with 14 players.

Yes. Its actually 7 vs 14. Rest of the four guys in BD team were RAWami agents.


Loser's excuse.

View attachment 204436

You will always lose, you can never win. Even if India try its best to lose than also you can't win.

Better team lost, if Raina was given out, India wouldn't even have made 250.

BD is better team... look at you.

Even if India scored 250 than also you lose by huge margin.

 

[East or West India Best]

lol East pakistan crying like expected.

 

[HttpError]

lol East pakistan crying like expected.

East Pakistanis WTF you Dumbo they are no Bangladeshi and are even more Indian than Bengladeshis, stop your Pakistani Obsession.

 

[holysaturn]

These stupid Indians. Always involved in some sort of controversy. They come on our forums to cry rivers. Fvck these Indian rapists.

Post reported

 

[garibnawaz]

You still around??/

Hum kaha jayenge?

Marriage, children and business have taken its priorities hence mostly reading mode.

 

[YounG_WolF]

You won't even found a single BDian who said BD is superior to India.All they asked is fairness.
Btw they say,Once cricket was gentleman's game.And then India started to play cricket!

 

[Soumitra]

You won't even found a single BDian who said BD is superior to India.All they asked is fairness.
Btw they say,Once cricket was gentleman's game.And then India started to play cricket!

That is why this is the 4th or 5th thread on the topic

 

[AHAM BRIHMASMI]

He was run-out, his bat was in the air. Also, it took ages for the 3rd Umpire to decide his fate but only a few seconds for Mahmudullah's and the no-ball decision was given without consulting the square-leg (I don't know if I am using the correct term) Umpire.

the no ball was given by the square leg umpire itself , go and see the replay. he declared it no ball immediately before the ball was caught.]