Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At times one seems to lose in the haze of India's divergently stated positions.
To the West and Americans, Indians howl that China is their number one enemy.
To the Chinese, they say we are your friends and don't want any war with you.
Yet, the Indians are raising 2-3 strike corps and other additional infantry and armour formations against the Chinese. They have stationed SU-30s and are endeavouring to improve their military related infrastructure in the area.
Their Tri-Service Command at Andaman & Nicobar is stated to be in a position to block the Chinese ship movement anytime they want to.
They themselves say that we can take care of Pakistan - no problem. So against whom are these new military raisings and enhancement of military infrastructure.
hmmmmm ....... it may be Bhutan.
It is impolite in china to point finger to others, lets say not middle finger. What about this gesture in India means?I have visited China and dont find any difficulty. One thing they dont like is "Pointing finger to them"
Indians see Chineese military expansion/ upgradation as a capability challenge and thus there is a need to balance the change where there is assymetry of forces not by numbers alone but with quality also. Improvement of infra in NE is happening after decades of neglect and is rightly fits even though belatedly in both defence and civil arena. The A&N area is of strategic value by its geography and even the works have started only recently. compare with the volume and quality of chineese upgradation it is very modest.
Historically, there is no reason for enemity between the two giants but last conflict along with the active role played by China in assistance to Nuke development for Pakistan has reinforced a major feeling of her trying to balance the power equation in Asia. If viewed coldly, chineese actions seem very logical and part of a balanced and nuanced policy.Pragmatism demands re enforcing weak areas so as to enable non existence of force assymentry which will further rule out the option of cooercioin/ limited clashes/ accidental use of force. Ihis will in turn strengthen diplomatic engagement and resolution of friction areas.
Not related but India's enemy are terrorism, poverty and corruption. Pakistan's conventional forces are well factored and matched favourably on western borders however, open space for non state actors ( whatever definition is implied) are a major threat and irritant to strengthening diplomatic engagements. That is what is to be looked out for.just my two cents.
Excellent comments. Let me highlight some of the aspects that one can discern about India's strategy for China.
China’s defence effort is much bigger than that of India. This can pose a potent threat to India.
A major geographical imbalance places many of India’s political and economic centres close to the Himalayan Ranges. Particularly Siliguri Corridor places India in a delicate position if there is uncertainty in the area.
Contrarily, almost all of China’s economic and political centres of gravity are in Eastern China though Tibet certainly is a sensitive region.
China has carried out major improvements in her logistical infrastructure in areas close to Indian border.
The possibility of Chinese gaining a strategic surprise against India are indeed low, with fair bit of warning time available to India.
China is unlikely to embark on any major adventure to disturb the status-quo along the border in the near to mid-term future.
Indians feel that the Chinese would be able to deploy about 33 Divisions against them which indeed is a potent threat.
The Indians feel that as Chinese and Indian interests clash, Chinese may enhance military presence and may initiate support to insurgent groups in disputed areas.
The Chinese could also use Burmese territory to extend threat and may use Bay of Bengal for limited projection of power.
India is likely to follow a strategy of dissuasive defence. However, as dissuasion being a comparatively weaker option, it will be coupled with strategic offensive capability having a potent deterrence.
Indians are putting due emphasis on improved logistics infrastructure while reducing the teeth to tail ratio.
To gain appropriate warning time, India is enhancing its integrated surveillance capability linked with satellite based surveillance. Improved intelligence acquisition capability in particular collusion with Americans.
[INDENT[/INDENT]
It is impolite in china to point finger to others, lets say not middle finger. What about this gesture in India means?
Tourism is not a big priority for the Indian Govt, IMO.
However cultural ties with China should be improved.
Pointing finger to some one in India is showing "hostile to him" and about 80 % of Indian I think dont know meaning of pointing middle finger....
This is a good example of culture difference. I'd love Indian way of expression, straight and sensational.self delete
They take china threat as an excuse for developing nuke. How many Indian member in this forum take china as a must opponent to defeat,no chance for coexistence?
The realistic in china is we love Indian culture and know Pakistan is our closest ally. Not much hatred described by global times.
This is a good example of culture difference. I'd love Indian way of expression, straight and sensational.