What's new

Twitter gets an Indian-American CEO - Parag Agrawal

there are plenty of CEOs of Lebanonese or Cuban or Egyptian origin in USA. Indonesians do not emigrate to USA. Indonesians are 1/5th of the Pakistani community in USA.

Normalized for population Indians and Chinese dominate the technology sector in USA. It is not just CEOs - it is top management, principal engineers, patent holders etc. It is no secret. I do not know why it is so hard to acknowledge the obvious
There are plenty of Upper management Pakistanis too, they cant have some of the highest incomes without it
What should I do- act like a Pajeet and do Bhangra on this stupid thing?
what exactly is there to be proud of? - The guy earns money for himself and his family, He happens to have a Pak heritage or even education from Pak
but what exactly is he doing to help Pak?, him being there in the first place is a failure on part of Pakistan who couldn't capitalize on his talents or his "desh" drohi ways
whatever sticks

Why should I bang on about Pak- living abroad?- Bangladeshi abroad are almost mostly working class while Pak are not
Should I go bang on about look we are supa powa, we are this, we are that (while knowing this sample abroad does not represent the reality of Pak or Bang - all it does is make Pak looks worse if you have a brain you can tell why it makes Pak look worse than Bangla)

Hell forget Ban I think Pak aboard have higher incomes than some east Asian countries- should I go bang on about this?, cause clearly it means nation of Pak is better than east Asian countries, hopefully you can see the ridiculousness of this whole argument that dude was making

All in all - I find this whole exercise really dumb
 
.
there are plenty of CEOs of Lebanonese or Cuban or Egyptian origin in USA. Indonesians do not emigrate to USA. Indonesians are 1/5th of the Pakistani community in USA.

Normalized for population Indians and Chinese dominate the technology sector in USA. It is not just CEOs - it is top management, principal engineers, patent holders etc. It is no secret. I do not know why it is so hard to acknowledge the obvious

No, Chinese are being deliberately denied leadership positions in tech. Indians are being helped. There is no comparison.

Chinese are running a marathon with a ball and chains around their feet, Indians are driving.
 
.
No, Chinese are being deliberately denied leadership positions in tech. Indians are being helped. There is no comparison.

Chinese are running a marathon with a ball and chains around their feet, Indians are driving.

There are plenty of Chinese Americans in leadership. The older generation of Chinese (prior to 2000) had a severe problem with English.

This is how Corporate America works. You try to work up the corporate ladder. If management does not recognize you for your talents & work you are free to jump ship. the really smart ones start their own companies and become billionaires
 
.
There are plenty of Upper management Pakistanis too, they cant have some of the highest incomes without it
What should I do- act like a Pajeet and do Bhangra on this stupid thing?
what exactly is there to be proud of? - The guy earns money for himself and his family, He happens to have a Pak heritage or even education from Pak
but what exactly is he doing to help Pak?, him being there in the first place is a failure on part of Pakistan
Not sure where we are going with this

Pakistani American incomes trails Indian American incomes even on per household or per captia basis.

Pakistan is running on expatriate remmitances. Otherwise you are looking at 40% reduction in low standard of living

you are right that large scale migration of talent is a failure of the host society
 
.
Not sure where we are going with this

Pakistani American incomes trails Indian American incomes even on per household or per captia basis.

Pakistan is running on expatriate remmitances. Otherwise you are looking at 40% reduction in low standard of living

you are right that large scale migration of talent is a failure of the host society
I am going at the stupidity of Pajeets and the Nepali Ball sack- you are chiming in for no reason

Chinese American trails behind Indian-Americans, Pak American - clearly in Pajeet mind that's an accomplishment to boast about

Barely anyone sends remittances from west, Pak is not running on remittances of west- its part of it, but as much as its part of many other countries on earth, training labor is done by mother country(or else everyone in the world would have swimming with remittance)- best is if its used in the country, second best is sending it abroad through agreements- its bad because you are not taking the best option- Secondly a quite a chunk of this remittance is from freelancers/independent IT workers
They are not included as IT export

When migration of talent is a failure- why are pajeets making it a success story in their mind?
 
. .
There are plenty of Chinese Americans in leadership. The older generation of Chinese (prior to 2000) had a severe problem with English.

This is how Corporate America works. You try to work up the corporate ladder. If management does not recognize you for your talents & work you are free to jump ship. the really smart ones start their own companies and become billionaires

Which is exactly what many Chinese Americans have done. They can't rise inside the hierarchy so they quit and start their own.
 
.
Which is exactly what many Chinese Americans have done. They can't rise inside the hierarchy so they quit and start their own.

It is not like the number of Chinese American entrepreneurs outnumber the number of Indian American entrepreneurs
 
.
I am going at the stupidity of Pajeets and the Nepali Ball sack- you are chiming in for no reason

Chinese American trails behind Indian-Americans, Pak American - clearly in Pajeet mind that's an accomplishment to boast about

Barely anyone sends remittances from west, Pak is not running on remittances of west- its part of it, but as much as its part of many other countries on earth, training labor is done by mother country(or else everyone in the world would have swimming with remittance)- best is if its used in the country, second best is sending it abroad through agreements- its bad because you are not taking the best option- Secondly a quite a chunk of this remittance is from freelancers/independent IT workers
They are not included as IT export

When migration of talent is a failure- why are pajeets making it a success story in their mind?

I am chiming in because you are inserting a lot of half truths

" Chinese American trails behind Indian-Americans, Pak American "
Chinese Americans do not trail Pakistani Americans in any respect. They are one of the most outstanding ethnic minorities. I say they have done better than Indian Americans ignoring the edge Indian Americans have in household income.

"Barely anyone sends remittances from west"
The remittances from the West is below what it is obtained from the Gulf Arab states. It is not insignificant by any means

"Secondly a quite a chunk of this remittance is from freelancers/independent IT workers"
If you are not physically present it is not called remittance

"When migration of talent is a failure-"
That is true at a certain level.

In USA Pakistanis are not performing above average. They are making above the norm in terms of income. Normalize it for education, occupations and other factors. Pakistanis have disproportionate number of doctors for their population levels. You can explain the difference. Pakistanis are below average in terms of household income in UK and Canada. A lot of them are dependent on social welfare handouts. There are plenty of red flags on the Pakistani experiences abroad.
 
. .
:lol: :lol: lol damn this dude is so wrong on so many of these things/levels and is clearly pulling things out of his a**, luckily for you when I get time and be a little free
ill prove with proper screenshots and links how much of a joke you are by thinking that no one will catch your bs
 
. . .
It is easy to know why Indians are preferred they are obedient to a fault and even myself if I was a CEO I would have hired an Indian over a Chinese just because his more obedient
Obedient to who? Do you know what CEO does . If you need a CEO to run a company by telling him what to do,then my friend you don't need a CEO.
imagine celebrating brain drain.
There would have been no IT industry in India, if it was not for the brain drain . People who left india have played a major role and contributed in its growth back in India.
 
.
Obedient to who? Do you know what CEO does . If you need a CEO to run a company by telling him what to do,then my friend you don't need a CEO.

There would have been no IT industry in India, if it was not for the brain drain . People who left india have played a major role and contributed in its growth back in India.

CEO is answerable to board of directors. there is still no IT industry in india - its still sector. Not an industry - barely anything gets produced just serviced.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom