What's new

Turkish soldiers in the Korean War

On one occasion Turks misunderstood the objectives instead of retreating they charged on the advancing enemy who was massive in numbers.
I admire that about the Turkish soldiers in Korea. Unafraid to death, and charging with bayonets against all odds.
Reminds me of our own Imperial soldiers in WWII.
 
reading about the battles and looking at our losses, i believe that our ancestors fought bravely and hard in some bizarre circumstances. no doubt about that. On the other hand, though, i have this uncomfortable feeling that many of those sayings by western officials were kinda half-hearted; just to win the heart of the Turkish public and the ruling party of that time about Nato. For nato it was important to win Turkey than to lose it to Soviets. i mean, those Europeans and Americans were praising Turks into the heavens while they historically were (and still are) skeptical and kinda hostile towards us, doesnt make much sense.
 
reading about the battles and looking at our losses, i believe that our ancestors fought bravely and hard in some bizarre circumstances. no doubt about that. On the other hand, though, i have this uncomfortable feeling that many of those sayings by western officials were kinda half-hearted; just to win the heart of the Turkish public and the ruling party of that time about Nato. For nato it was important to win Turkey than to lose it to Soviets. i mean, those Europeans and Americans were praising Turks into the heavens while they historically were (and still are) skeptical and kinda hostile towards us, doesnt make much sense.

Yeah but the average american korean war veteran admires the turks aswell and were amazed so I don't think these statements were made to trick us.
 
I'm not taking anything away from the Turks, but I got to say after years of hearing how some describe Chinese sacrifice and bravery in WW2, and then learning more as I grew older.

I came to one conclusion, these comments are only reserved for the weak.

Reports on Chinese bravery, 10,000 filipino conquer the world, Indian bravery, Pakistani bravery, this and that. What I will say is this.

I hope never again will China be described as brave, cause you know who gets the brave label? Weak dudes, who people expect to fold.

As far as i know Chinese were brave also.

From Grandfather said to my father that, "When they checked Chinese deads, they only find a rifle and small amount of rice.... they were fighting with minimal equipment, also during Chinese offensives, casuelties never disheartened Chinese troops.... they continued attacking wave after wave forcing Turks to withdrew....

On a short notice in that battle single Turkish brigade fought against 8 Chinese divisions... being outnumbered 1 to 32.....
 
One brigade against an entire Army? My respect goes to the Turkish Force, period.

Honor and Glory is theirs, period.

Yeap... Grand Father described the whole battle to my father and him to me... later on father bought a book from TSK(army) describing all the events in chronological order. We saw the military map and Turkish brigade was against 8 divisions...

But it's not like Turkish Brigigade stood there and repelled all the attack of Chinese.

When first Chinese wave hits, Chinese immediatly move to flanks, other one hits and that to move to flanks... wave after wave... our brigade threatened with encirclement so , they withdrew some distance and establish on other front.. then Chinese repeat the same tactic over and over again.... but they couldn't encircle and eventually Turkish brigade withdrew all way back to UN line... it must have been insane.
 
We often hear about the Turkish population of 80 million and Turkey’s powerful armed forces, the second largest in NATO, after the United States. Sometimes things are quite different from what they seem to be. Especially in the case of the Turkish Army, one can easily say that the created impression is totally false. In fact it is a myth created by the Americans since the Korean War.

Quite often we become observers of reports and comments both in international bibliography, that present a totally overestimated and false impression, concerning the Turkish military performance. It is the outcome of a myth about the “fearsome” and “outstanding” Turkish Army, which has been skillfully or naively created on purpose, having as a result to totally alter the truth. It is a case that deliberately alters the historical past. In fact the truth knocks down the image of the “brave”, “fearless” and “skillful” Turkish soldier.

The myth’s start about the modern Turkish Armed Forces is identified during their first engagement with the enemy in the last 60 years. It took place during the Korean War, where it is totally revealed, that an almost useless military formation, achieved beyond its own will to create a whole legend about a supposed Turkish “art of war”.

In a typical book of a summary presentation of the Korean War, such as “The Korean War 1950-53” the reader can read the following: “Although at peace since 1923, Turkish troops were generally considered the best of the smaller UN contingents; they fought well, especially in close combat; were steadfast in defense, and resolute as PoWs; and were well led”.

This paragraph includes as we will see all the parameters of the legend about the almost “superhuman” Turkish soldier who is good in every aspect, even when defeated and being captive.

The Greek reader is having a similar picture, reading the pages of “The military power of Turkey. A challenge for the Hellenic Security”: “There is an old rumor, that the Turkish Soldier is particularly tough and battle reliable. This rumor was cultivated during the first years of the Ottoman age, the Gallipoli Battle and the participation of a Turkish brigade in the Korean War [...] For their combat action they were described [the Turks] by General McArthour as the “bravest of the brave”.

The obvious question that comes in mind, concerns the significant fluctuation in the Turkish battle-worthiness in the 20 years separating Korea and Cyprus. Perhaps after all no difference existed? Perhaps even in Korea the Turkish fighting level was as low as in Cyprus? Examining certain facts, we believe it proves, that reports like the ones preceded are not based on historical facts or studies, but constitute simple reproductions of impressions and generalized comments that are conceded with no limits for reasons concerning political expediencies or they just form fantasy creations originating from ignorance and illiteracy, in order to impress the ignorance.

THE TURKS IN KOREA

The Turkish Brigade arrived at the port of Pousan on 18 October 1950 and it was officially titled “Turkish Armed Forces Command”. The brigade’s body, consisted of the 241st Infantry Regiment including three Infantry Battalions, one Field Artillery Battalion, a Signals Platoon, a Pioneer Company, a Transportation Company, a Medical Company and an Ordnance Company. There was a total force of 5,455 men. Brigadier General Tahsin Yazici was the Commanding Officer. On 1 September 1951, the Turkish Brigade was replaced for the first time, after a staying period of 10 months in Korea having a new CO Brigadier General Sirri Acar. Replacements took place also on 30 July 1952 and 4 September 1953, while the final departure took place in May 1954. Those replacements concern likely the brigade in its total, since it seems that it was replaced every time by a fresh one, coming from Turkey.

When the Turks arrived at Korea, were poorly equipped, since their equipment was outdated in its total. The soldiers were wearing the British “battle-dress” uniform that was recently adopted by the Turkish Army, heavy military overcoats, British Mk2 helmets and individual leather-made webbing of German origin. Before enter the fighting in November, they just managed to get equipped with modern US arms and standard US M1943 clothing, which was not issued immediately. Gradually, the Turkish clothing and equipment was replaced with US made and especially the brigades that arrived later in Korea were totally issued with US material and arms.

It is astonishing to observe that, the Turkish myth, starts as soon as the Turks arrived in Korea. It is true, that during their arrival they were given a lot of publicity for a number of reasons that have to do mostly with the observer’s psychology and aim. It has to be taken into account, that during that time, Turks were more or less unknown to the American people and even more concerning their fighting skills. The Turkish Army had not fought since 1922, so an average observer, could form an opinion only through a rough review of its history. The fatal influence of the Ottoman Empire history and also from the First World War formed a picture of a “capable” and “brave” army with tough reputation. But this reputation is based mainly on slaughters and genocide’s of civilians or paramilitary formations, for which Turks are notorious to their neighbors. A third party observer who has not made further studies can not have a direct perception and naturally forms a wrong picture. In this way we have the first evidence who led to the creation of the Turkish myth.

James Stokesbury, obviously influenced, describes: “Among the most prominent contributors, the Turks sent a much-respected infantry brigade, whose men were evidently uninterested in higher tactics or sophisticated military skills, but possessed much rugged courage and willingness to endure”.(3) There are also historical reports that generate specific questions concerning their subjective dimension and also the degree of altering and overestimating the meaning of simple everyday ethos or procedures of an army: “Turks were admired a lot for their unlimited toughness and resistance to the Chinese. The only traitor was silently murdered by his compatriots. When one of their men was sick, two of his colleagues were responsible for his survival”.(4)

A more realistic account of the truth, is given by the description of the Turkish image by Clay Blair: “The Turks, commanded by Brigadier General Tahsin Yazici, had arrived in Korea like the Marines, in a blaze of publicity. With their colorful, flowing mustaches, swarthly complexions, and fierce demeanors, they gave war correspondents and others the impression they were very tough soldiers. The reality was that they were ill trained, ill led, and green to combat”.(5)

Mike Michaelis,
CO of the US 27th Infantry Regiment who fought in Korea, described in an elegant style the average Turkish soldier that arrived in Korea to fight: “The Turks were commanded by an aged brigadier who had been a division commander at Gallipoli in 1916 fighting the British! He was highly respected, high up in the Turkish military establishment, and took a bust to brigadier to command the brigade. The average Turk soldier in the brigade came from the steppe country of Turkey, near Russia, had probably had only three or four years of school, was uprooted, moved to western Turkey, given a uniform, [a] rifle, and a little smattering of training, stuck on a ship, sailed ten thousand miles, then dumped off on a peninsula – ‘Korea, where’s that?’ – and told the enemy was up there someplace, go get him! The Turk soldier scratches his head and says, ‘What’s he done to me?’”(6)

The problem that the Allies would face with the Turks was easily understood having them arriving in Korea. Only a few of them, mainly officers were speaking English, while on the other hand no American was speaking Turkish. Therefore, the level of contact and communication between the Turkish Brigade and the IX Army Corps Headquarters where it was attached, was particularly poor up to non-existing, at least during the first stages.

8s.jpg


cvcv44hr8s.jpg


4566134250_55e7664a0c_b.jpg



52IlAKNj_ph.jpg




2920403744_d5646bf7e0.jpg





korea3.jpg

Preserving Freedom in Korea

korea2.jpg

Turkish Soldiers against Chinese

korea-32.jpg

Turkish Soldiers in Korea again
Damn, the most amazing achievement of the Turkish soldiers in the Korean War was mistakenly brutally attacking the South Korean army!!!! "🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣" damn, there will be a lot of propaganda to soften the defeat of the US and all its allies in the Korean War
 

Back
Top Bottom