What's new

Turkish Origins.

Attila the Hun

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Messages
3,912
Reaction score
-2
Country
Turkey
Location
Turkey
Capture.PNG


Not wanting to derail the other thread, thought I'd start this one. Is my friend @2800 wrong or not?
For me, we share very little with Persians. This is just my personal opinion, I don't claim to have the answers to everything, I just go by with my interactions with Persians/Iranians etc.
 
.
Nowadays sciences have proved Anatolis are very close to Iranians.

J2-Y-DNA-Haplogroup-Map-J2-M172-Map-J2-Haplogrubu-Haritasi-v3.png


Anatolia was a province of Persian and Byzantine Empires for 2 millenias. Seljuks defeated byzantine and liberated Anatolia. 300 years later an Oghuz Turkish leader as an emigrant from Kazagistan named Osman established Ottoman empire.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkification
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire

Turkish glory is fake.

Turks and Anatolis are completely different people. At least sciences tell this to us.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
.
View attachment 370541

Not wanting to derail the other thread, thought I'd start this one. Is my friend @2800 wrong or not?
For me, we share very little with Persians. This is just my personal opinion, I don't claim to have the answers to everything, I just go by with my interactions with Persians/Iranians etc.
I would say Turks are more closer to Persians than Mongolians or Turkic peoples. 'Mongolian' drama and ect... is more derived from the development of an national identity which contrasts the reality.
 
.
Actually, science is every thing
we must trust science than politicians who wrote fake history
 
.
Turks look more like Greeks than Persians.

Iranians have some South Asian genes.
 
.
Ethnic identities are social constructs and thus genetic arguments are trivial in this matter. Most identities are simply based on language. Thats the raw thruth of the matter. However genetics shouldnt be completely disregarded. We are Turks, the fact that we have Persian heritage just makes us that much more Turkic. Genetic arguments are a double edged swords. For example you see a lot of Iranians claiming Azerbaijani's as Iranic based on what little genetic studies they find with doubtfull academic grounds, but tend to leave out the part where Tajiks are genetically closer to Turkic people in Central Asia. We Anatolian Turks are genetically "mediterranean". So saying Turks look like Greeks/Persians is accurate in both cases.

I would say Turks are more closer to Persians than Mongolians or Turkic peoples. 'Mongolian' drama and ect... is more derived from the development of an national identity which contrasts the reality.

Wrong. Its derived from the building of an identity that pre-dates the Islamifications of Turks. In others words its tries to build an ancient unity and brotherly connection with the elements that represent central asian nomadic heritage and culture the most. The Mongolians are just a prime example and thus Mongolian history and historical figures are elevated to "blood-brother" status. It isnt inaccurate, but so is the Persian hypotheses. The very nature of the Turkic identities allows pretty much every single groups of people to become part of it. The focus on nomadic heritage allows for a shitton of assimilation and integration of other ethnic groups without loosing the core Turkic identity. The fact that we dont look central asian, makes us that much more Turkic. Turks are heterogeneous, not homogeneous thus any genetic arguments becomes invalid. Most Turks definitly have non-Turkic heritage and history, but most also dont care. Kurds, Circassians, Zaza, Georgians, Greeks, Armenians, Laz, Persians, Arabs and especially Slavs.
 
Last edited:
.
Selam
Shouldnt Have used pics to prove your point. Cant c any difference other than the effects of culture.
Selam. Of course some can look like twins, but , on average there's a clear difference, again this is just my opinion. :)
 
.
View attachment 370541

Not wanting to derail the other thread, thought I'd start this one. Is my friend @2800 wrong or not?
For me, we share very little with Persians. This is just my personal opinion, I don't claim to have the answers to everything, I just go by with my interactions with Persians/Iranians etc.

LOL Persians back at again with claiming everything is from Persia/Iran.

Pyramids are from Persia

Carpets is from Persia

Clocks is from Persia

Physics is from Persia

Bellydancing is from Persia

Christianity is from Persia

Judaism is from Persia

Mongols are from Persia

Turks are from Persia

Chechens are from Persia

Islam is from Persia

Gravity was created in Persia

God was created in Persia

Earth is from Persia

The Universe is from Persia

etc,etc
 
.
Persians are genetically and linguistically close to Northern Indians (a term that includes Pakistanis as well). I rarely confuse a Persian with an Arab, but with Northern Indians I sometimes do.
 
Last edited:
.
I would say Turks are more closer to Persians than Mongolians or Turkic peoples. 'Mongolian' drama and ect... is more derived from the development of an national identity which contrasts the reality.
I have no problem, you are free to think that. it's not wrong or right.
Didn't want to cherry pick pictures. tried to show crowds .

More Turks...

football-fans-04.jpg
fenerbahce-female-fans-turkey-football-nationalturk-0345.jpg
turkey-kurds_.jpg
PHO-09Dec14-193530.jpg
turkish6.jpg


Persians.

asian-cup-2015-in-australia-iranian-football-fans-23.jpg
f6b9b4275c903d23e3f111d5b532f2bf.jpg
DSC-0154.jpg


Not too dissimilar, but you can see some differences - well, maybe that's just me. :)
 
.
I have no problem, you are free to think that. it's not wrong or right.
Didn't want to cherry pick pictures. tried to show crowds .

More Turks...

View attachment 370609 View attachment 370610 View attachment 370611 View attachment 370612 View attachment 370613

Persians.

View attachment 370614 View attachment 370615 View attachment 370616

Not too dissimilar, but you can see some differences - well, maybe that's just me. :)
Turks are not a homogeneous people. Anatolia has been and still is, one of the most diverse regions in the world. Although many of the different ethnicity, cultures and peoples have been integrated into a single 'Turkish identity'. There will be people that look like Greeks, Arabs, Persians, Russians, Slavs, Central Asians and ect...
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom