Danjuma Musa
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2020
- Messages
- 109
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
If you are that confident in your weapons, how come you haven't dared to invade Lebanon and destroy Hezbollah? You've been threatening to do that for the past 17 years or so. Don't forget that Hezbollah isn't backed by a world power like America or Russia, compared to the pKK in Syria and Iraq.You can't do shit against Israel.
ISIS and Kurds are taking out your tanks like they're nothing, Israel in 2006 and Israel today are nothing alike, and Israel had way less casualties against Hezbollah than Turkey had against Kurds.
We can just nuke your *** back to the stone age.
Of course our AD can do that, we have our Elta ELM-2270 Over The Horizon radars for maritime surveillance with 370km+ range radar against low flying missiles and drones, as well as Sky Dew radar blimp with Electro-optical and radar sensors with 250+km range, not to mention Saar 5 and Saar 6 are equipped with ELM 2248 radars and equipped with 40 C-Dome 70-100km range (naval Iron Dome) and 16 Barak-8-ER 150km range VLS launchers and many reserve C-Dome and Barak-8-ER interceptors.
Not to mention your cruise missiles are all subsonic and are easy targets for even Israeli jets.
View attachment 905000
View attachment 905004
Israel are not some powerless Kurds, your drones will be shot down, Iran and Hezbollah are a bigger threat drone, cruise missile and ballistic missile wise than Turkey, Israel is preparing to fight Iran and Hezbollah's huge arsenal, not small Turkish arsenal.
Israel has more missiles capable of reaching Turkey than Turkey has capable of reaching Israel and Turkey has no capability to defend itself with garbage tier S-400 missiles and other useless old point defense cannon systems.
You will never have nukes, mark my words.
Israel develops weapons for longer time, less money for development and achieves better results.
Turkish weapons are only for poor countries. Israeli weapons are purchased by all the greatest powers.
Lol, that's what Egypt and Syria said, 0 strategic depth, so we just got us strategic depth by taking the Sinai and Golan. Then in 1973 they couldn't take them back so they had to wait 6 years after the war to get it back in a peace treaty.
Why don't you help the Saudis and Emiratis since American PAC3s and THAAD failed miserably? You don't have to reveal any defence secrets. American forces can man those Israelis systems themselves.
Thirdly, how do you know the types and number of missiles owned by Turkey?
I also read one of your comments claiming that Turkey will NEVER have nukes. Really? Seems like you lack or pretend not to have in-depth understanding of events in the Muslim world. Here are a few tips to help you think deeper:
1. The easiest option is a Turkey-Pakistan-Azerbaijan-Qatar-Libya military alliance. No need developing Turkish nukes and provoking U.N sanctions (not that it'll matter that much in the near future). The Pakistani nuke arsenal will just be expanded and strengthened with longer range advanced delivery systems, like ICBMs. Pakistani nukes will replace NATO's.
2. If the Pakistani alliance option fails, just develop the defence sector to reach an export potential of $100 billion. Deploy enough firepower in Qatar and Libya to threaten the petrodoallar even more while turning the East Med into a graveyard for enemy navies. Export a lot of weapons to friendly countries in anticipation of possible UN sanctions. Those countries still gonna pay for parts, armo, and maintenance, so Turkey will still maintain access to foreign cash notes (blunting sanctions effects). Reorientate the Turkish economy away from Europe and the Americas so Western sanctions can have manageable effects on the Turkish economy.
If you think Turkey will endure unfair UN sanctions indefinitely, then you still don't understand the Sunni Islamists. Your puppet governments in the Middle East will pay the price. And then your economies will feel the impact of gas disruption.