UkroTurk
BANNED
- Joined
- May 7, 2015
- Messages
- 3,610
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Yeah . Why would enemies attack with Antiship missiles on ASW patrol vessel in the war scenario? enemy's would let their submarines be blocked.?or let our patrol vessels be destroyed by antiship missiles?
You: there is no need air radar on YTKB.
Me: you can't run CIWS without air surveillance and illuminating radar .and what about air defence umbrella. Low altitude flying f16s, cruise missiles, uavs?
You : we have frigates and corvettes
Me: coastal low air defence with 2000 tonnes frigates?? What if they would be needed at offshore?
However constructer of YTKB has already put RAM on website.
Moreover Turkish Navy prefer 40 dardo as antiaircraft weapon because TN wants secure coastal airspace. Thats Why there is a weapon system officer sitting infront of big computer.
İ think now you will start screaming :RAM-RAM
You would prefer RAM costs 20million USD without radars?? I would'nt shoot a drone which costs much more cheaper than a RAM missile. What i am offering cheap than dirt 250 pieces 35mm cal rounds plus several Cirit missiles. Total amount of a system would cost maximum 5million usd which is reasonable for this mission.
Again you: the YTKB has twin 40mm it is also CIWS.
Your country produces naval 35mmCIWS called Gökdeniz for own navy!!! Because 35mm P ammunition is best for the ciws. Many naval forces refraining 20mm phalanx , do you suggest using 40mm cal the worst ciws in the world against antiship missiles?
You : it is a patrol vessel, putting Cirit missiles is still bad idea!!
Having tested Stinger platforms, Turkish Navy is being said to prefer another missiles. Most propably UMTAS and Cirit.
You: you can not reconstruct the ship. It has already been constructed.
Me: its not my problem. It is just my imagination as i had drowned here picture a Turkish warship with gps guided artillery rockets( wait i found it) before Turkish navy tested them on ships.
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/turkish-naval-forces-dzkk.302689/page-22#post-7819809
Before Testing happened ,i had made those photoshops
So Dear Tansu , you haven't said anything new for me.
You: there is no need air radar on YTKB.
Me: you can't run CIWS without air surveillance and illuminating radar .and what about air defence umbrella. Low altitude flying f16s, cruise missiles, uavs?
You : we have frigates and corvettes
Me: coastal low air defence with 2000 tonnes frigates?? What if they would be needed at offshore?
However constructer of YTKB has already put RAM on website.
Moreover Turkish Navy prefer 40 dardo as antiaircraft weapon because TN wants secure coastal airspace. Thats Why there is a weapon system officer sitting infront of big computer.
İ think now you will start screaming :RAM-RAM
You would prefer RAM costs 20million USD without radars?? I would'nt shoot a drone which costs much more cheaper than a RAM missile. What i am offering cheap than dirt 250 pieces 35mm cal rounds plus several Cirit missiles. Total amount of a system would cost maximum 5million usd which is reasonable for this mission.
Again you: the YTKB has twin 40mm it is also CIWS.
Your country produces naval 35mmCIWS called Gökdeniz for own navy!!! Because 35mm P ammunition is best for the ciws. Many naval forces refraining 20mm phalanx , do you suggest using 40mm cal the worst ciws in the world against antiship missiles?
You : it is a patrol vessel, putting Cirit missiles is still bad idea!!
Having tested Stinger platforms, Turkish Navy is being said to prefer another missiles. Most propably UMTAS and Cirit.
You: you can not reconstruct the ship. It has already been constructed.
Me: its not my problem. It is just my imagination as i had drowned here picture a Turkish warship with gps guided artillery rockets( wait i found it) before Turkish navy tested them on ships.
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/turkish-naval-forces-dzkk.302689/page-22#post-7819809
Before Testing happened ,i had made those photoshops
So Dear Tansu , you haven't said anything new for me.
Last edited: