What's new

Turkish Naval Programs

For the new generation AIP we don't have rush, ther is no design of a submarine on the table. I think that SSB want first finish the current submarine project, and after that they will begin to design a Turkish submarine. Like i wrote before, after 15 years we will see a lot of proud prouct but, who lives until that day Allah now the best:-).
 
. . .
Atmaca was even ready 2 years ago, planned to be used in last 2 Milgems but Roketsan couldnt receive proper financial support for integrating it onto management system, also couldnt handle an R&D for shrinking the size of console and equipments ( initial size were triple of harpoons console) , finally they got it completed, no more obstacles for integrating it on last milgem. There is even a salvo shoot ability, where quadruples can be launched in sequence to the same target in short time, harpoon has it as well but i always considered it was somehow intentionally got delays between launch sequences ( at least, it was sensed so).
I expect to see different milgem ( ada class) designs, will not be surprised if some appears with vls with less complement ( number of crew will be shrunk) and even short range AA missiles.
Curiosity remains on if there will be a cafrad model specially for milgem or I class, or might TF-100 will appear with it?
More sure about TF-100 wont be designed by armerkom or naval shipyards but will be handed over to a private company ( STM, it seems)
TF-2000 remains unsure, it might anytime can be transferred to STM, with privatization of pendik naval shipyard and Navantia 's consultancy, there has been speechs around from some officials about how naval shipyard working such inefficiently and designs got delayed , someone might be whispering to president about this already.
I have high senses based on some proofs that, current civilian manager of military shipyards are actually slowing down some progress with irresponsible requests and inspections ( i havent personally trusted on him since the first )
Cavitation tunnel almost has been erected, towing tank has been refurbished, got update on some equipments ( someone recently spoken on news about towing tank in ITU that it was shut down or in total broke condition! That turned out to be BS)
Manoeuvre test capability has been added to towing tank for small scales, for large scale proper , model manoeuvre tests are going to be held in a lake inside ITU ( which is good)
Yildiz T.U has been building a tank in dimensions which is proper for submarine tests (dive, surface, turn around manoeuvres) , and claimed to be used for surface vehicles too but unsure.
Cavitation tunnel will be a game changer for submarines and surface vessels, more over, proper tests can be conducted on hidroacoustics on our own. This tunnel also will be used for super/hipersonic missile designs as its claimed.
 
. .
Sorry for the late response. Thank you for your opinions and your comment.
Well, I try to stick around time to time to come across with old friends like you among with the rest of the pack here, meh.
I rarely come here,mostly in holidays and exists.
Lots of things to say but politics are sticky all around here, somehow everyone knows everything better than Us :)
 
. . . . . .
2FA4A049-6A95-4619-A306-EBD9146FAACE.jpeg
 
. .
Atmaca was even ready 2 years ago, planned to be used in last 2 Milgems but Roketsan couldnt receive proper financial support for integrating it onto management system, also couldnt handle an R&D for shrinking the size of console and equipments ( initial size were triple of harpoons console) , finally they got it completed, no more obstacles for integrating it on last milgem. There is even a salvo shoot ability, where quadruples can be launched in sequence to the same target in short time, harpoon has it as well but i always considered it was somehow intentionally got delays between launch sequences ( at least, it was sensed so).
I expect to see different milgem ( ada class) designs, will not be surprised if some appears with vls with less complement ( number of crew will be shrunk) and even short range AA missiles.
Curiosity remains on if there will be a cafrad model specially for milgem or I class, or might TF-100 will appear with it?
More sure about TF-100 wont be designed by armerkom or naval shipyards but will be handed over to a private company ( STM, it seems)
TF-2000 remains unsure, it might anytime can be transferred to STM, with privatization of pendik naval shipyard and Navantia 's consultancy, there has been speechs around from some officials about how naval shipyard working such inefficiently and designs got delayed , someone might be whispering to president about this already.
I have high senses based on some proofs that, current civilian manager of military shipyards are actually slowing down some progress with irresponsible requests and inspections ( i havent personally trusted on him since the first )
Cavitation tunnel almost has been erected, towing tank has been refurbished, got update on some equipments ( someone recently spoken on news about towing tank in ITU that it was shut down or in total broke condition! That turned out to be BS)
Manoeuvre test capability has been added to towing tank for small scales, for large scale proper , model manoeuvre tests are going to be held in a lake inside ITU ( which is good)
Yildiz T.U has been building a tank in dimensions which is proper for submarine tests (dive, surface, turn around manoeuvres) , and claimed to be used for surface vehicles too but unsure.
Cavitation tunnel will be a game changer for submarines and surface vessels, more over, proper tests can be conducted on hidroacoustics on our own. This tunnel also will be used for super/hipersonic missile designs as its claimed.
Are there any recent news about Atmaca missile tests? I didnt see any online information about Atmaca missile successfuly hit a test target by utilizing its seeker. Lets hope, that is the case but still not leaked to the media.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom