Turkey will stop teaching evolution in schools, education ministry says

[MultaniGuy]

I meant this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buraq

Buraq comes from religion.

Evolution is just a hypothesis which is man made.

What is your point?

 

[bobo6661]

Evolution is just a hypothesis which is man made.

Like bible and koran ...

 

[MultaniGuy]

Like bible and koran ...

Qu'ran claims to be a book of divine revelation.

Nice try idiot

 

[bobo6661]

Qu'ran claims to be a book of divine revelation.

Nice try idiot

Yee yeee he did teleport it and you got it in your hand ... Its man made to...

 

[EndangeredSpecies]

Yee yeee he did teleport it and you got it in your hand ... Its man made to...

Leave it man. This is a case of 'Belief in Belief'. You cann't change it.

 

[Trango Towers]

You will be surprised at how much common DNA you share with a Chimp. Or a mushroom for that matter. And I don't mean any disrespect by that.


Yeah and Saudi are foolish to think that way.

Seriously folks, how many of you think that Humans evolved from monkeys. As in monkeys you see in Zoo etc?

I was joking when I said speak for yourself. Yes there is a lot of similarity

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

If discovery of gene editing,new smart drugs is dependent upon correct understanding of the Theory of Evolution, then this is a shot in the foot...Any Biologist here who can help me out?

 

[EndangeredSpecies]

If discovery of gene editing,new smart drugs is dependent upon correct understanding of the Theory of Evolution, then this is a shot in the foot...Any Biologist here who can help me out?

No biologist but speak clearly what you are suggesting.

 

[MultaniGuy]

If discovery of gene editing,new smart drugs is dependent upon correct understanding of the Theory of Evolution, then this is a shot in the foot...Any Biologist here who can help me out?

You mean monkey to man.

Nobody believes in that.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

No biologist but speak clearly what you are suggesting.

If Muslim scientists are unable to develop gene editing or better drugs because they donot believe in the Theory of Evolution, then it's a bad thing for Muslim nations..else not...If lack of belief in Theory of Evolution hampers their progress in medicine,food technology, forestry,animal husbandry , then it's bad thing...Does lack of conviction in the Theory of Evolution have real world consequences?

 

[MultaniGuy]

If Muslim scientists are unable to develop gene editing or better drugs because they donot believe in the Theory of Evolution, then it's a bad thing for Muslim nations..else not...If lack of belief in Theory of Evolution hampers their progress in medicine,food technology, forestry,animal husbandry , then it's bad thing...Does lack of conviction in the Theory of Evolution have real world consequences?

Do you believe in monkey to man.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

Do you believe in monkey to man.

I personally have conviction in the Scientific Consensus.... I have conviction in the mainstream Scientific Consensus in any field of which I am not an expert..I also did a bit of work in Evolutionary Algorithm..It's neat how evolution works in Computer Algorithms

 

[EndangeredSpecies]

If Muslim scientists are unable to develop gene editing or better drugs because they donot believe in the Theory of Evolution, then it's a bad thing for Muslim nations..else not...If lack of belief in Theory of Evolution hampers their progress in medicine,food technology, forestry,animal husbandry , then it's bad thing...Does lack of conviction in the Theory of Evolution have real world consequences?

Well, two things.

1. Most of the scientists when they are doing research at times use results of science with ease even if they will never admit to believe them in their social and personal discourse. It is as if they leave their religion at the door step of their lab. Yes, humans can be hypocrites.

2. One can selectively disregard a theory and still use its parts. Like some christians believe that only Humans are special creation, rest animals don't matter Or God created all living beings and he did it via evolution. That allows them to still study and accept genetic and molecular basis of life while rejecting evolution. Again, humans can be hypocrites.

So rest assured, even the most staunch followers of religions get their kids vaccinated even if they believe that it is God who controls life. Similar things allow scientists from such countries to conduct genetic research while vehemently denying evolution.

You should see the extent to how some folks of Jewish faith go to keep their technology compatible with their religion.

I personally have conviction in the Scientific Consensus.... I have conviction in the mainstream Scientific Consensus in any field of which I am not an expert..I also did a bit of work in Evolutionary Algorithm..It's neat how evolution works in Computer Algorithms

Actually I do not think GAs are very convincing models for evolution itself. GAs are stochastic optimization at its core. There are many other similar ones like simulated annealing etc. Most of these are nature inspired but not natural. Similar is the case of Neural Nets. They are biology inspired but they do not simulate biology.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

Well, two things.

1. Most of the scientists when they are doing research at times use results of science with ease even if they will never admit to believe them in their social and personal discourse. It is as if they leave their religion at the door step of their lab. Yes, humans can be hypocrites.

2. One can selectively disregard a theory and still use its parts. Like some christians believe that only Humans are special creation, rest animals don't matter Or God created all living beings and he did it via evolution. That allows them to still study and accept genetic and molecular basis of life while rejecting evolution. Again, humans can be hypocrites.

So rest assured, even the most staunch followers of religions get their kids vaccinated even if they believe that it is God who controls life. Similar things allow scientists from such countries to conduct genetic research while vehemently denying evolution.

You should see the extent to how some folks of Jewish faith go to keep their technology compatible with their religion.

Actually I do not think GAs are very convincing models for evolution itself. GAs are stochastic optimization at its core. There are many other similar ones like simulated annealing etc. Most of these are nature inspired but not natural. Similar is the case of Neural Nets. They are biology inspired but they do not simulate biology.

Quality Posting...

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

We are predominantly of liquid composition. I didn't say one day ape and one day man.


Speak for yourself mate. My DNA and yours are not the same

Lol. What are you? Homo Muslima?

Its their internal affairs.

If you ask my opinion on Darwinism, its nonsense.

Its just a hypothesis or a theory.

Who is going to accept that their grand mother was a monkey !

Lots of people accept it except someone who think magically they came from 2 people God created If that's true believers of such people might be products of ancient incestors