What's new

Turkey opens new embassy compound in Dhaka, pledges increased cooperation with Bangladesh

. . .
LOL you are the one who brought up this off-topic
Offtopic?.. bangladesh should stand with the so-called genocide cries of the world.. bangladesh should ask ottomans to apologise armenia before buying any weapons.
 
. . . .
I don’t need to, I’m not a broke Pakistani looking for economic opportunities in the land of my former oppressors



Opportunities no.... They just wanna be safe lest their schools blow up and 200 odd kids get shot..... Who would want to live in such a place ?

But they think they're relevant now because their government spent some $$ in 2019 to bring some white YouTubers to boost their 'image'....

The only image I need is viscera and leather sandals strewn across some marketplace with splattered vegetables and blood.
 
.
Get lost from this thread.
Lol.. I was just here for some nagan dance.

I don’t need to, I’m not a broke Pakistani looking for economic opportunities in the land of my former oppressors
Bengalies have a banglatown in east london.

Being broke is a test of god it comes and goes it dosnnt get transferred to offsprings. but being a radical hater is only a curse of god. You die hating and pass it on to your next generation.
 
Last edited:
.
who is saying he was ethnic bengali, he was a cultural bengali.
its a cutural thing .

As for who started it, it was definitely Mughals who on the top passed wrong orders.. but that was the time for Bengal to revolt against its rulers...
It is a fun to see someone from BD is criticizing others for not learning enough history to know that Mir Zafar was not a Bengali. If we study history, we find no one except Raja Ganesh was an ethnical Bengali to ascend the throne of Bengal during Muslim period. He usurped the Iliyas Shahi Dynasty. However, Ganesh was a Brahmin and so, technically, he was also not a Bengali because his Aryan forefathers came from the Central Asia.

The reality is, except Raja Ganesh, all the Maliks, Sultans, Subedars and Nawabs of Bemgal during Muslim period were carrying foreign blood. The list starts from Ikhtiaruddin Muhammad Bakhtier Khilji and ends at Nawab Sirajuddoula and finally Nawab Mir Zafar. There is no exception.

The same is true for Delhi and North India. The truth is, many foreign Muslims entered Hindustan including Bengal and domiciled here who are now Bengali/ Bangladeshi/ Indian or Pakistani.

People should not only read history, but should also analysis it with heart.
 
.
Lol.. I was just here for some nagan dance.


Bengalies have a banglatown in east london.

Being broke is a test of god it comes and goes it dosnnt get transferred to offsprings. but being a radical hater is only a curse of god. You die hating and pass it on to your next generation.
Test of god he says? 😂😂😂 that means god already let us be in heaven then 😂😂😂
 
.
Offtopic?.. bangladesh should stand with the so-called genocide cries of the world.. bangladesh should ask ottomans to apologise armenia before buying any weapons.

Yes, off-topic. You brought up that 71 topic though it's not relevant here, cried to me that we complain about it then kept blabbering on about it yourself and dragging it on. You seem more agitated about genocide than Armenia and Bangladesh. Why not go cry to Imran Khan to issue a third apology again and this time as a statement. Even he regrets what his army did in 71. Better do that first before telling us what to do. Cause Hasina asked you again. 😂

"So called genocide cries?" Are you trying to say no genocide happened in Armenia and Bangladesh?

By your logic why don't you ask countries which committed atrocities against Muslims, still does and destroys their countries to stop, apologize and compensate them before buying any weapons from them and selling to them as you cry a lot about Kashmiri Muslims and Muslim Ummah around the world.

being a radical hater is only a curse of god. You die hating and pass it on to your next generation.

Okay, we already know. No need to describe yourselves.

he was a cultural bengali.

So if he is not ethnic Bengali why did you say "Bangladeshis" produced him when there was no Bangladesh during that time at all? The way you are saying it as if all Bengalis back then whispered in Mir Jafar's ears to betray Siraj.

The British came here to do business first. Just like any other country's merchants do. There was no way to know at first that letting them doing business here would be a wrong thing to do. If they didn't break the rule to increase influence here while doing business, nobody could've said anything to them. British had foothold in Bengal before they had problems with Nawab. Why and how would Bengalis revolt against rulers? They had no power and there was no concept of democracy back then. Why didn't you revolt genius? You were under their rule too.
 
Last edited:
. .
Yes, off-topic. You brought up that 71 topic though it's not relevant here, cried to me that we complain about it then kept blabbering on about it yourself and dragging it on. You seem more agitated about genocide than Armenia and Bangladesh. Why not go cry to Imran Khan to issue a third apology again and this time as a statement. Even he regrets what his army did in 71. Better do that first before telling us what to do. Cause Hasina asked you again. 😂

"So called genocide cries?" Are you trying to say no genocide happened in Armenia and Bangladesh?

By your logic why don't you ask countries which committed atrocities against Muslims, still does and destroys their countries to stop, apologize and compensate them before buying any weapons from them and selling to them as you cry a lot about Kashmiri Muslims and Muslim Ummah around the world.



Okay, we already know. No need to describe yourselves.



So if he is not ethnic Bengali why did you say "Bangladeshis" produced him when there was no Bangladesh during that time at all? The way you are saying it as if all Bengalis back then whispered in Mir Jafar's ears to betray Siraj.

The British came here to do business first. Just like any other country's merchants do. There was no way to know at first that letting them doing business here would be a wrong thing to do. If they didn't break the rule to increase influence here while doing business, nobody could've said anything to them. British had foothold in Bengal before they had problems with Nawab. Why and how would Bengalis revolt against rulers? They had no power and there was no concept of democracy back then. Why didn't you revolt genius? You were under their rule too.
Who is agitated? Does Bangladesh have any principles when it builds foreign relations with countries or is it just about themselves? and those principles don't apply elsewhere? Even in their own case they have forgotten a few things.. How is Bangladesh's relations with Great Britain? When is Bangladesh going to ask Great Britain for an apology for enslaving its people and using it as a jumping board to conquer rest of the subcontinent. Or ask them for an apology for 3-4 million killed due to an avoidable famine or the great killings during the 20s, or the ones right after direct action day in 46? who will apologize for that?
 
.
Can we keep this thread on topic?

I wonder what the BD military will end up buying from Turkey?

Also, note from post #2 this thread was de-railed by a Pakistani.
Armenians and Bangladeshis have lot more in common.
Both have similar complains towards their former rulers.

Yes I see the burning hearts and jagged comments. Yet no action is taken. I think this chap has also made spiteful comments in other threads that made the thread tailspin.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom