Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More troll thread titles?
Now 2/3 of all "Ottomans" (which were Arabs), let alone the largely Arabized Ottoman entity (language, alphabet, system, bureaucracy, culture to a large extend, titles (Caliph, Sultan), lands controlled de jure and de facto, population, 2/3 Arab etc.) have turned "Turkic" or into Turkey (a 100 year old nation state)? Nice logic.
Using that logic the entire Arab world and by default Muslim world (almost) is part of Saudi Arabia. Whenever KSA should invade an entity in the Muslim world you should make such thread tittles.
KSA invades Spain and France (former Umayyad Arab empire) etc. Looking forward to the KSA-Iran war.
KSA invades Arab pagans in Yemen currently (former Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid etc. Arab empire). Great stuff.
Always wanted to invade Sicily. Beautiful part of the world.
BTW I can spot some 15 Turkish flags and 100+ FSA flags/alternative Syrian flag flags.
How does it feel Arabs are flying Turkish flags and no Saudi or UAE ones?
And stfu camel jockey, you lived under Turkic rule for 1000 years. Your calling Turkey a new country almost all Arab borders were draw by British lol
This retard thinks ummayads had anything to do with dirty Najd whores of Saudi Arabia.
Logic is the last thing you expect from an Arab.
They are but honestly speaking I don't care which nation state flags they waive. All I know is that Al-Assad will soon deal with them and that Erdogan's failed MB project has been crushed everywhere. What is left is tiny Qatar.
How does it feel being a Turkified and Arabized Anatolian and worshipping an dynasty that was Arabized?
No such thing ever occurred in history donkey jockey. Arabia was never controlled by any Turkic people. 2/3 of all Ottomans were Arabs and local dynasties ruled in Hijaz (Sharif of Makkah) which was only second in importance to the Sultan and Caliph (beautiful Arab titles).
Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasids and Fatimids which ruled the Islamic Caliphate and most of the Muslim world were ruled by HIJAZI ARAB dynasties from modern-day KSA. Including during 90% of all Islamic conquests.
The Turkified and Arabized Arab-obsessed inferiority ridden whore and retard things that he is a "Turkic Mongol" while in reality he is the offspring of Armenians, Kurds, Greeks, Arabs and what not who have been conquered and ruled (not only ruled LOL) by Romans, Persians, Arabs, Turkic nomads from Central Asia and everyone in between.
Go take a DNA test and look out for a heart attack.
Assad will soon deal with them? Lol not while Turkic troops are stationed there, Arabs can only watch.
Arabs have been ruled by everyone, Romans, Persians, Greeks, Turks, British, Americans list goes on.
So obsessed with DNA anyway, I have a interesting question how many of the 50000000 million Arabs can fit into Idlib?
Assad will soon deal with them? Lol not while Turkic troops are stationed there, Arabs can only watch.
How does it feel being a Turkified and Arabized Anatolian and worshipping an dynasty that was Arabized and which today is 0,5% Turkic and 99,5% European?
Turks" (never did either outside of the Seljuk's)
Even Americans can't occupy Iraq you think Turks can occupy Syria? They are giving Turks a chance to leave. If not, Kornets will kill Turks
Even Americans can't occupy Iraq you think Turks can occupy Syria?
America has been raping Iraq for past 10 years, move along now deluded China man.
Al-Assad and the Syrian ARAB Army are no longer Arabs or what?
Even the SDF is mostly Arab.
Not at all. Romans (expect for a tiny part of Hijaz which was ruled by pro-Roman Arab kings, 2 Roman emperors were Arabs btw), Greeks (never ruled any Arab territory), "Turks" (never did either outside of the Seljuk's and that was mostly Iraq and Sham), Persians (never ruled any Arab territory directly, always used satraps and they were heavily influenced by Semitic civilizations to the degree that they adopted our practices on every front basically), British (only for a few decades and here you can talk about actual rule, same with French in Algeria and Maghreb), Americans (never ruled anything other than changing a regime in Iraq which lasted 8 years).
Yes, when historical facts and actual evidence is put forward all your empty barking and obsessions disappear in the air.
I support Al-Assad if the alternative are terrorist groups and terrorist proxies created and funded by the Georgian and wannabe-Arab retard.
Hopefully nationalistic Turks will rule once again. This way you can focus on trying to become European and entering the EU (maybe in 100 years time) rather than being ruled by a retard who thinks that he can become the new "Sultan" and that Arabs are waiting for his "wisdom" and rule.
For now (on that bandwagon) you have tiny and isolated Qatar. As long as Trump will tolerate them seeing that the US rules it (largest US base is present in Qatar) and KSA-Qatar hostilities suits the US as well. But eventually sanity will prevail in the Qatari regime as well.
How do you think your beloved Erdogan has been doing in the past 6-8 years compared to the initial stage where you guys had cordial ties with most countries in the neighborhood?
Look at your economy today. Anyway you can support MB retards and similar groups. It will fail as it has already done. Turkey (Erdogan) tried to chew more than they can bite. We see it today. Utter failure of a policy in Syria and not only in Syria. Egypt, GCC, Iraq, Libya etc.
Creating enemies left and right.
Another public humiliation in Tehran lately. He looked very happy shaking the hands of Putin and Rouhani knowing that both are stabbing him in the back.
Suffered huge consequence. Economy collapsed in 2008. Hell, even Obamacare passed in 2010.
No one even reads your bullshit Arab, Turkic rape.
Oh stfu idiot you people have no honour so 10 years of rape is no problem for Arabs they just take it.
LOL. You are the rape product of Arabs. Look at your DNA. Arabs have zero "Turkic DNA". Proven ages ago. We are no Mongoloids, thank you very much.
As for slaves, actual Turkic people (not you wannabes) used to be employed as slaves by not only Arabs but other Muslims (Pashtuns for instance) as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_slaves_in_the_Delhi_Sultanate
Arabs were considered "holy" in the Arabized Ottoman empire where they were the vast majority. Who are you kidding?
Meanwhile you Anatolian peasants were one of the lowest ranks.
Ottoman figures speak about this openly.
Özay Mehmet wrote in his book Islamic Identity and Development: Studies of the Islamic Periphery:[28]
“ The ordinary Turks [Turkmen, or Yörüks] did not have a sense of belonging to a ruling ethnic group. In particular, they had a confused sense of self-image. Who were they: Turks, Muslims or Ottomans? Their literature was sometimes Persian, sometimes Arabic, but always courtly and elitist. There was always a huge social and cultural distance between the Imperial centre and the Anatolian periphery. As Bernard Lewis expressed it: "In the Imperial society of the Ottomans the ethnic term Turk was little used, and then chiefly in a rather derogatory sense, to designate the Turcoman nomads or, later, the ignorant and uncouth Turkish-speaking peasants of the Anatolian villages." (Lewis 1968: 1)
In the words of a British observer of the Ottoman values and institutions at the start of the twentieth century: "The surest way to insult an Ottoman gentleman is to call him a 'Turk'. His face will straightway wear the expression a Londoner's assumes, when he hears himself frankly styled a Cockney. He is no Turk, no savage, he will assure you, but an Ottoman subject of the Sultan, by no means to be confounded with certain barbarians styled Turcomans, and from whom indeed, on the male side, he may possibly be descended." (Davey 1907: 209)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Turkism
You represent that peasant demography very well on PDF. Please continue!
95% + of the population of the so-called "Ottomans" was non-Turk. Who are you kidding, troll?
If you are a Turkic individual, I am a Papuan.
You are mixing Kemalistic fairytales that are 100 years old and mixing that with Ottoman (Arabized and Islamic society mostly Arab in nature, geography, demography etc.) and hence your schizophrenia. If actual science (DNA) is included into this mix you get a heart attack. I don't care much about DNA but I can't take some Anatolian off-spring of 4-5 ethnic groups (Arabs included) seriously when he is trying to claim some "achievements" of nomadic Central Asian Turkic peoples, lol, 1000's upon 1000's of km away seriously. A joke.
Actual Turkic people are those lot below who are still worshipping animals and stars. Culturally and linguistically conquered people by Russians who have lived under their rule for centuries. Nothing to be proud of. What are their accomplishments actually? Did they even built a single World UNESCO Heritage Site? Highly doubtful.
If there is one thing that Arab and Persian nationalists can agree on it is the above and the joke that this is.