TTP Response to Amnesty By Shah Mehmood Qureshi

[messiach]

Shah mahmood is just an incompetent over-confident brat. When invitation for a dialogue is given, it should be an open invitation to come to table. Why giving these dogs unconditional pardon even before any invitation is officially send by GoP and accepted by the opposite side. How stupid of this man? He should be demoted to the post of peon in foreign office.

ttp is down in the drums, few splinter groups exist on the opposite of border - uncle samite has left 85 mil $ worth of equipment and cia/raw assets for no other reason but to keep alive this dead outfit.

@Horus @Windjammer @The Eagle such threads should be banned or bundled up as one.

QUOTE="jus_chillin, post: 13342425, member: 200852"]
TTP responds to Shah Mehmood Qureshi's offer of amnesty. “As for forgiveness, forgiveness is sought for mistakes, we’re proud of our struggle, we have never apologized to our enemies. We believe in meaningful dialogue if it ensures implementation of Shariah in Pak,” TTP says

https://twitter.com/x/status/1438807485448478729

[/QUOTE]

 

[Titanium100]

I don't know man. Rise of TTP is gonna be natural with Afghan Taliban takeover..

Not really bro. A turmoil in Pakistan will be equal to doomsday for them which is their least wish and most disliked scenario occurance because it unravals alot of other things because if you open that gate enemies 1000 times worse than Pakistan will enter from the LOC this is by far not in IEA interests believe me when I say this they have no interest in such occurance hence IEA core interests aligns with Islamabad by default for the short term and long term future. I will even go out on a limp here and say they will even militarily intervene on behalf of Pakistan if Islamabad were to call on them all tho not necessary here but just an example here to explain to you the will to secure this core interest.

It won't be necessary because pakistan has one of the strongest militaries in the world but I used that as an example to make a point come across

 

[Genghis khan1]

There's certain areas in Pakistan that are "trouble" areas that don't like Pakistan. Those are Waziristan, Central Baluchistan, and the areas surrounding Chaman. The first 2 has actually taken up arms against the state, while Chaman hasn't.

Pakistanis on this forum need to realize that Waziristan tribes (Mehsud and Wazir) are both heavily involved in TTP and PTM. They are involved in these activities because of the lack of economic opportunities/development and the image of Pakistan Army. The average Waziri has a very negative view of the army. Integration is the long term strategy that is being employed right now, but for the short term we need to win the hearts and minds of those people.

They way you deal with these trouble areas, is strong internal security and than prosecution. Instead of making them martyr, hang them as criminal. Denial of facilities to family members. Only Killing them on battlefield will not work. Strangulate them slowly in the hometown. Restriction of movement. Those involve in killing, taking their property to pay those that are killed, legally. Slow over the years, either they will leave their areas, or start cooperating with the govt.

 

[graphican]

It's better to offer peace before providing RIP

Agree, and this time punishment needs to be equal to their crimes. Justice alone eliminates injustce.

 

[Azog]

Like it or not but India is winning the battle. Their soldiers in IOJK are hardly getting injured or killed in recent times but our soldiers are getting butchered every day in tribal belt/ Balochistan

 

[Mirzali Khan]

Not really bro. A turmoil in Pakistan will be equal to doomsday for them which is their least wish and most disliked scenario occurance because it unravals alot of other things because if you open that gate enemies 1000 times worse than Pakistan will enter from the LOC this is by far not in IEA interests believe me when I say this they have no interest in such occurance hence IEA core interests aligns with Islamabad by default for the short term and long term future. I will even go out on a limp here and say they will even militarily intervene on behalf of Pakistan if Islamabad were to call on them all tho not necessary here but just an example here to explain to you the will to secure this core interest.

It won't be necessary because pakistan has one of the strongest militaries in the world but I used that as an example to make a point come across

I hope bro.

 

[INS_Vikrant]

Like it or not but India is winning the battle. Their soldiers in IOJK are hardly getting injured or killed in recent times but our soldiers are getting butchered every day in tribal belt/ Balochistan

It's because lack of local support to insurgents in kashmir, insurgency can only remain active if local people of a region aid and shelter the insurgents. Once support from locals gets eroded insurgency ends naturally.

 

[Titanium100]

Their soldiers in IOJK are hardly getting injured or killed in recent times

India is not winning anything anywhere India sees alot of casualities thru out her country but it doesn't diminish India nor does few Paramilitary diminish Pakistan by the way your comment was based on exaggeration but stragetically India is not winning anything but checkmated from all corners it has to many border lines to focus on not only PK and PK has stragetic depth secured Pakistan is increased and India decreased. The Indian experts will agree with this notion themselves which is a basic ground reality

 

[Mirzali Khan]

They way you deal with these trouble areas, is strong internal security and than prosecution. Instead of making them martyr, hang them as criminal. Denial of facilities to family members. Only Killing them on battlefield will not work. Strangulate them slowly in the hometown. Restriction of movement. Those involve in killing, taking their property to pay those that are killed, legally. Slow over the years, either they will leave their areas, or start cooperating with the govt.

Its either that or development/integration

 

[TheSnakeEatingMarkhur]

TTP responds to Shah Mehmood Qureshi's offer of amnesty. “As for forgiveness, forgiveness is sought for mistakes, we’re proud of our struggle, we have never apologized to our enemies. We believe in meaningful dialogue if it ensures implementation of Shariah in Pak,” TTP says

https://twitter.com/x/status/1438807485448478729

Don't worry their time is near. In Sha Allah

 

[doorstar]

for Chaman and Waziristan - ethno-nationalist?, Religion?

answer lies in the French TV video you posted earlier

 

[Genghis khan1]

Its either that or development/integration

That should got hand in hand with punitive measures to optimize risk/reward situation, but development requires money.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

TTP responds to Shah Mehmood Qureshi's offer of amnesty. “As for forgiveness, forgiveness is sought for mistakes, we’re proud of our struggle, we have never apologized to our enemies. We believe in meaningful dialogue if it ensures implementation of Shariah in Pak,” TTP says

https://twitter.com/x/status/1438807485448478729

@waz Can someone delete this thread? Why are we giving space to the terrorist narrative? Its against national action plan.

 

[Vapnope]

We shouldn't be giving amnesty to terrorists even if they claim to shun the path of violence. We should provide a meeting between them and their creator...

 

[doorstar]

uncle samite has left 85 mil $ worth of equipment and cia/raw assets for no other reason but to keep alive this dead outfit.

I used to take you somewhat serious, but more I read your posts the more I realize that you are no different than about 95% of PDF members who I'd describe as egoists and braggers who'd say anything populist that comes to mind whether true or false.

Indians spent over 2 billion dollars for terror purposes but according to you the US is going to spend a miserly sum of 85 million and achieve what the bharatis failed at despite spending billions