What's new

Trump wants to create an ‘Arab NATO’ in the Middle East

A federation would be better honestly.
It might get there one of these days, but this is IMAFT..Trump aids and reporters like to make sensational headlines.. they think of it as a NATO-like organisation and they like to call it the Arab-NATO and sometimes the Arab-Islamic-NATO organisation, they can not make their mind yet on the name, but we know it is IMAFT..
Note: While NATO is for full war involving nation to nation, IMAFT is constrained to fight terrorism..there is a sea of differences between them..
 
.
It might get there one of these days, but this is IMAFT..Trump aids and reporters like to make sensational headlines.. they think of it as a NATO-like organisation and they like to call it the Arab-NATO and sometimes the Arab-Islamic-NATO organisation, they can not make their mind yet on the name, but we know it is IMAFT..
Note: While NATO is for full war involving nation to nation, IMAFT is constrained to fight terrorism..there is a sea of differences between them..

IMAFT is absolutely integral in increased corporation between Muslim nations. If only Iran joined...

Nonetheless I hope we eventually develop a NATO like organization but completely separate from IMAFT. I heard a while back of a Arab defense force. Don't know what happened to it. So I will check that out later.
 
.
IMAFT is absolutely integral in increased corporation between Muslim nations. If only Iran joined...

Nonetheless I hope we eventually develop a NATO like organization but completely separate from IMAFT. I heard a while back of a Arab defense force. Don't know what happened to it. So I will check that out later.
The Arab coalition is the one fighting in Yemen, it has GCC members, with Jordan, Egypt, Sudan and Morocco in it (i might have forgotten others..but not many)..
IMAFT can serve as a stepping stone or a preparatory step to oil the wheel for some real separate NATO like organisation of Muslim countries
 
.
The Arab coalition is the one fighting in Yemen, it has GCC members, with Jordan, Egypt, Sudan and Morocco in it (i might have forgotten others..but not many)..
IMAFT can serve as a stepping stone or a preparatory step to oil the wheel for some real separate NATO like organisation of Muslim countries

Lets just hope for the best. One thing that is really frustrating is lack of pics. I want to see what the troops will look like and how they will operate. Will it be a professional shock force to be followed through with Native forces? Or will it be a dedicated rapid deployment/reaction force that will be deployed for long periods of times? It is all so maddening with the lack of Info.
 
.
Lets just hope for the best. One thing that is really frustrating is lack of pics. I want to see what the troops will look like and how they will operate. Will it be a professional shock force to be followed through with Native forces? Or will it be a dedicated rapid deployment/reaction force that will be deployed for long periods of times? It is all so maddening with the lack of Info.
I heard before it will be a rapid reaction force that will be highly trained and very well equipped..

mediana_347303047317722719.jpg


saudi-led-military-allaince-bg20160316201745.jpg


alliance.jpg


So we should call it IMCTC


yyyyy.jpg



 
Last edited:
.
An "Arab" NATO is useless... the only thing who could get enough momentum and power balance in In and Outside circle of influence...will be at least some sort of "Muslim" NATO... with North/Central Asian countries+ MENA+ West/East africans countries + South Asian ones...

Till then... That shadow NATO's made in Arab world will be useless since... you can't have a king alone on his own kingdom...
 
.
You republicans paved the way for isis to come to power and now you want to create an arab nato :rolleyes:

Here's a better solution "GTFO of middle east you anglo imperialists"
 
.
IMAFT is absolutely integral in increased corporation between Muslim nations. If only Iran joined...

Iran would have joined if that organisation was acting in Iran's interest. Obviously it wasn't, so there isn't much to be upset about.
 
.
Lets just hope for the best. One thing that is really frustrating is lack of pics. I want to see what the troops will look like and how they will operate. Will it be a professional shock force to be followed through with Native forces? Or will it be a dedicated rapid deployment/reaction force that will be deployed for long periods of times? It is all so maddening with the lack of Info.
We have the Egyptian example:
 
. .
why do you delete my post ????
I can understand how much is hard for some member here to unveil their stands along Zionist.
 
. .
if what Article said happen than good times ahead for KSA and Alliance ..
Not so good news for Pakistan... we can continue to count our loss for not taking the lead in beginning.

It is just a testimony to Iranian strength in the region at least BM wise.. the assumption concerns "In case of war"_god forbid_, KSA should be able to defend itself.. Muslims even if they have to raise $1000 each to defend Makkah they will do it, that is $1 trillion dollars if it comes to that.. so $100 billion to defend oneself following the saying that if one wants to live in peace one should prepare for war, makes some sense.. regardless of a true or false treat from Iran or others..

thus far only Saudi Army had the honor to protecting Mecca and Medina, from missiles of evil axis!
 
.
lol I better go and buy some moar of Raytheon, Boeing and et al stocks. Huge cash cow :yahoo: for US arms maker( sell them old over priced hardware)

And yes US already said this so called " arab nato" weapons capability will always be inferior to the ones US give Israel:omghaha:
 
.
thus far only Saudi Army had the honor to protecting Mecca and Medina, from missiles of evil axis!
That is why they are buying THAAD and other systems..probably Naval AEGIS too..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom