What's new

Trump tweets Iran today. Threats Iran ALL CAPs TWEET.

Interesting, which empire is he refering to.. "our empire" ...umayads or abbasids?:lol:

I think he was referring to your country as welll. Pakistan didn’t become a country till 1940’s.

The Persian Empire ruled lands when most of the Middle East were not even modern day countries. All the Persian Gulf arabs were living in sand huts and Pakistan was not even a word. Hence why some in Pakistan speak dialects of Farsi.

Meanwhile the Persian Empire reached all the way to Greece’s doorstep and included former powerhouses such as the Egyptian Empire and as Far East as all China’s doorstep. Pakistan didn’t even become a country till 1947.


So many countries in world, should not pound their chest when they have not even existed as a country for a 100 years let alone 1000s.
 
I think he was referring to your country as welll. Pakistan didn’t become a country till 1940’s.

The Persian Empire ruled lands when most of the Middle East were not even modern day countries. All the Persian Gulf arabs were living in sand huts and Pakistan was not even a word. Hence why some in Pakistan speak dialects of Farsi.

Meanwhile the Persian Empire reached all the way to Greece’s doorstep and included former powerhouses such as the Egyptian Empire and as Far East as all China’s doorstep. Pakistan didn’t even become a country till 1947.


So many countries in world, should not pound their chest when they have not even existed as a country for a 100 years let alone 1000s.
I don't believe/trust islamists and uuummah-seekers talking about Iranian empires. Most of times they have an agenda when doing so. I'm Iranian by the way.
 
View attachment 488011


Funny part is Iran has not attacked any country in the last 3 centuries and the USA from 2 continents away has come here already occupied Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and Libya .. has sought regime changes in this region including several times in Iran and still accuse Iran of interfering in internal affairs of regional countries.
View attachment 488010
If we are in Iraq 'cause Iraqi Gov asked us, same in Syria.

So Nadir Shah didnt exist?
 
So Nadir Shah didnt exist?
َAlmost 278 years ago and after sending several requests to Indian to either send back Afghan criminals to Iran or punish them which not only India refused to arrest killer of Iranian people and hand them to Iran or punish them they killed Nader envoy at the end ... Iran did try diplomatic channels for several times to solve the case but Indians were not interested ..
 
Good take on this twitter war from Escobar:

‘Tweet of Mass Destruction’ ratchets up tension on Iran
The Trump administration's ultimate goal is regime change in Tehran, but was this just a distraction from the 'treason' in Helsinki as US Mid-Term elections loom? Or did he just want to destabilize the Eurasian giants and their New Silk Roads?
By PEPE ESCOBAR JULY 24, 2018 6:15 PM (UTC+8)
rump-Iran-960x576.jpg

Iranians burn an image of US President Donald Trump during an anti-US demonstration outside the former US embassy headquarters in the capital Tehran on May 9, 2018. Photo: AFP/Atta Kenare
President Trump’s late-night, all-caps Tweet of Mass Destruction threatening Iran is bound to be enshrined in the Art of Diplomacy annals.

But let’s go back to how this all started. After unilaterally pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal, the Trump administration has issued what amounts to a declaration of economic war on Iran and will go no holds barred to squeeze the Islamic Republic out of the global oil market – complete with threatening allies in Europe with secondary sanctions, unless they cut all imports of Iranian oil by November 4.

The dailyReport

Must-reads from across Asia - directly to your inbox
This past weekend, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei said he would support blocking all Middle East oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz if Iran’s European trade partners succumb to pressure from Washington and stop buying Iranian oil altogether.

Then President Hassan Rouhani followed Khamenei and warned the US about “playing with the lion’s tail.”

Rouhani, as his record attests, has always behaved as the epitome of cool diplomacy. Contrary to predictable US media spin, he never “threatened” to attack the US. His premise was that Tehran was pleased to offer Washington the “mother of all peace.” But if Trump instead decided to attack Iran, then (italics mine) that would open the way to the Mother of all Wars.

Ultimate goal: Regime change
The fact remains that the Trump administration ditched a UN-sponsored multilateral treaty and has now launched serious covert ops with the ultimate goal of regime change in Iran.

Trump’s explosion of rage, coupled with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s touting of the interests of “the long-ignored voice of the Iranian people” has been met with derision and scorn all across Iran.

Geopolitically, Russia-Iran relations remain extremely solid, as shown by the recent meeting between President Putin and Khamenei’s top foreign policy adviser Ali Akbar Velayati. As Professor Mohammad Marandi at the University of Tehran told me: “The Putin-Velayati meeting went very well. Velayati plans to go to Beijing in a few weeks. People in Iran hate Trump, and all political parties and factions have become much more united. Rouhani’s speech was widely watched and very well received.”

Khamenei and Rouhani are on the same page – and that’s very significant in itself. They now agree any negotiation with Washington is futile. Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif provided the coup de grace, tweeting that Iran had lasted millennia and had seen many empires fall. He wrapped up with an all-caps Trumpism: “BE CAUTIOUS!”

The whole soap opera is ridden with pathetic overtones as US “experts” posing as extras digress that there are only two outcomes left for Iran: capitulation or implosion of the “regime”.

Anyone claiming Tehran will capitulate shows an utter ignorance of the overall mood of defiance and scorn among the Iranian people, even as they are faced with massive economic hardship. And anyone stating there will be regime change in Tehran basically parrots a US “policy” that is just wishful thinking.

The US neo-conservatives that brought the world the failed, multi-trillion-dollar Iraq war should have been buried not six feet, but six miles under. Yet, like the Walking Dead, they will never give up.

But, in the Middle East, at the moment there are three characters who are singin’ and dancin’ like everything is going according to plan: Saudi Arabia’s Mohamed Bin Salman (MBS), his mentor, the United Arab Emirates’ Mohamed bin Zayed, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Surely they are not heeding the expert advice of former Mossad head Meir Dagan, who stated that a military attack on Iran was “the stupidest thing I have ever heard.”

Deliberate distraction?
It’s always possible that Trump’s all-caps spectacular may be a ruse to distract Americans from the Helsinki “treason” scandal. That gets traction when associated to the looming mid-term elections and Trump’s absolute need to sound tough and keep the Republicans in line. Call it a brilliant Trump strategic maneuver. Or was it Putin’s?

Back to reality, the stark options would come down to either Iran becoming a US satellite or closing the Strait of Hormuz – something that for all practical purposes would collapse the global economy.

I have been assured that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has the technological means to block the Strait and would not flinch to go for it rather than yield, if the going gets tough. President Rouhani cannot resist the IRGC. The Trump administration has, in fact, forced Rouhani to show his cards. All branches of the Iranian government are now united.

War hysteria, already on, is extremely irresponsible. In the worst Strait of Hormuz scenario, the US Navy would be impotent, as Russian-made SS-N-22 Sunburn missiles could wreak havoc. Washington could only bomb from Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar or Incirlik in Turkey. Neither Qatar nor Turkey is inclined to antagonize Iran.

The Pentagon would have to bomb coastal missile sites on Iran’s Persian Gulf shoreline. But these are heavily camouflaged; missiles are portable, and there’s no reliable on the ground intel. Iran only needs to fire one missile at a time. No oil tanker would possibly try to get through.

Things don’t even need to degrade towards a shooting war. All Tehran needs to do is to make the threat credible. Insurance companies would stop insuring oil carriers. No oil carrier will navigate without insurance.

Breaking Russia-China-Iran
The geopolitical game is even more complex. Velayati was in Moscow only a few days before Helsinki. Diplomatic sources say Iran and Russia are in synch – and closely coordinating policy. If the current strategy of tension persists, it raises the price of oil, which is good for both Russia and Iran.

And then there’s China. A tsunami of sanctions or not, Beijing is more likely to increase oil imports from Iran. “Experts” who claim that Iran is becoming a pawn of Russia and China are hopelessly myopic. Russia, China and Iran are already firmly aligned.

Short of war, the Trump administration’s top priority is disruption of the New Silk Roads – the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) – between China and Europe. And the key economic connectivity corridor goes across Iran.

The fundamental “enemy” is China. But to make any divide-and-rule plan work, first, there’s got to be an attempt to lure Russia into some sort of entente cordiale. And in parallel, Persian destabilization is a must. After all, that’s what the Cheney regime used to describe as “the great prize”.

http://www.atimes.com/article/tweet-of-mass-destruction-ratchets-up-tension-on-iran/
 
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ls-trump-we-are-ready-to-stand-up-against-you

Senior Iran military chief tells Trump: 'We're ready to stand up against you'



Quds commander suggests country may disrupt oil shipments through Red Se

Saeed Kamali Dehghan and Patrick Wintour

Thu 26 Jul 2018 14.15 BST First published on Thu 26 Jul 2018 13.32 BST



Qassem Suleimani (centre) says Trump may start a war but Iran ‘will end it’. Photograph: HO/AFP/Getty Images
The senior Iranian military commander Qassem Suleimani has hit back at Donald Trump’s tweeted threats against Tehran in colourful language, likening him to a gambler and a cabaret owner, and saying Iran would be the one to “end” any war between their two countries.

“I’m telling you, Mr Trump the gambler, I am telling you: know that where you are not thinking of, we are near you. Places you cannot imagine, we are next to you,” said Suleimani, who is in charge of the Quds force, the external arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, during a speech in the western city of Hamedan on Thursday. “We, the Iranian nation, have gone through tough events. You may begin a war, but it is us who will end it. Go ask your predecessors about it. So stop threatening us. We are ready to stand up against you.

“The Red Sea which was secure is no longer secure for the presence of American [military] ... The Quds force and I are your match. We don’t go to sleep at night before thinking about you,” added Suleimani, according to the Tasnim news agency.

Suleimani’s intervention was in response to a tweet on Sunday by the US president, who warned Iran of “consequences the likes of which few throughout history have ever suffered before”. It was prompted by a speech by the Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, who had warned that the US shouldn’t “play with lion’s tail” and that “America should know that peace with Iran is the mother of all peace, and war with Iran is the mother of all wars”.

Suleimani told Trump: “It is not in our president’s dignity to respond to you, but I, as a soldier, will,” before adding: “[Your] language belongs to cabarets. Only a cabaret owner uses such language to communicate with the world.”

Suleimani is the most senior Iranian official to weigh in over the Trump-Rouhani row, which has escalated the hostile rhetoric between Tehran and Washington. In May, Trump unilaterally pulled the US out of the 2015 landmark nuclear deal, in spite of European opposition and the fact Iran has kept its obligations under the agreement, as repeatedly verified by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Washington wants all countries to stop buying Iranian oil by 4 November, which has sparked an angry response in Tehran, which has threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, where one-fifth of the world’s oil passes through in tankers. Suleimani’s mention of the Red Sea indicates Iran would also consider disrupting oil shipments through the Bab al-Mandeb Red Sea route via proxies.

“What could you do that you haven’t already done over the past 20 years?” Suleimani asked of the US. “You came to Afghanistan with tens of tanks and armoured vehicles and hundreds of advanced helicopters and committed crimes there but what the hell have you achieved [in Afghanistan] between 2001 and 2018 with 110,000 troops? Isn’t it that now you are begging the Taliban to negotiate?”

Suleimani castigated the Trump administration for supporting the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MeK), an extreme Iranian opposition group that independent observers say is a cult-like organisation despised by most Iranians, with no visible support inside the country. “America had some grandeur in the past, but today, you have gathered these hypocrites who are Iran’s trash,” Suleimani said.

The Iranian commander, who previously called US soldiers in Iraq “pants-pissing wimps” during a visit to Syria, said: “Have you forgotten that you were providing your soldiers with adult nappies and today you are threatening us? What the hell could you do in 33-day war [in Lebanon] other than accepting Hezbollah’s conditions for an end to war?”

Suleimani’s warning to the US about the Red Sea comes on the same day Saudi Arabia, Iran’s regional rival, suspended oil exports through the strategic shipping lane of Bab al-Mandeb due to missile attacks on two oil tankers by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels off the Yemen coast.

Advertisement
“Saudi Arabia is temporarily halting all oil shipments through Bab al-Mandeb strait immediately until the situation becomes clearer and the maritime transit through Bab al-Mandeb is safe,” Khalid al-Falih, Saudi Arabia’s energy minister, said in a statement on Thursday.

Riyadh and Tehran are on the opposing ends of the three-year conflict in Yemen.

Saudi Arabia, which has led a US-backed military intervention in Yemen since March 2015 aimed at countering the advances of Houthis, who belong to the Zaydi sect of Shia Islam, accuses Tehran of militarily supporting the rebels.

Houthis have intensified missile attacks on Saudi soil and targets since Saudi and UAE coalition forces advanced towards the port city of Hodeidah, a key entry point for aid and food into Yemen.

Anwar Gargash, the UAE foreign minister, said the targeting of Saudi Arabian oil carriers in the Red Sea underscored the need to defeat the Houthi militia. “Such a systematic attack on maritime navigation represents a reckless terrorist act that reflects the nature of al-Houthi and its aggression.”

He defended the intervention in Yemen, saying the Saudi coalition had faced a choice between “a difficult decision now or an impossible position later” and said the strategic goal of removing Houthis from Hodeidah remained since it would force the Houthis to the negotiating table.

He said the UAE was giving the UN special envoy for Yemen, Martin Griffiths, time but added “there will be an end to the patience”, arguing anti-Houthi forces could not be expected to drive 200 miles forward up the coast to the outskirts of Hodeidah and then pull back.
 
So Nadir Shah didnt exist?
Nader shah invaded the mughal empire and killed the muslims the same Mughals that oppressed the hindus I don't know why you hindus offended by Nader shah who killed the muslim Mughals at the same time you don't consider the Mughals Indians you consider them as invaders

I don't believe/trust islamists and uuummah-seekers talking about Iranian empires. Most of times they have an agenda when doing so. I'm Iranian by the way.
Interesting, which empire is he refering to.. "our empire" ...umayads or abbasids?:lol:
the Safavid
image.jpg
 
Gen Soleimani specifically mentioned the following:

"Ask the ex-commander of your forces in Iraq who he sent to me to ask me to open a window of opportunity by using my influence to stop attacks by Iraqi resistance forces (Mujahedin) on the US soldiers so that they could withdraw from Iraq? Have you forgotten that you had provided adult-size diapers for your battle tank crews? What is your saga and what is the historical background that you rely on for threatening us?"

:omghaha:

Full text of Haj Qassem's speech:

http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13970504000477
 
Last edited:
Nadir revenged Mongols/mughals.

Pathians revenged Romans.

Iran revenged zionists by supporting their Muslim jihadi enemies for 40+ years out of Zionist 70 years old.

Etc...

Etc...
 
Nadir revenged Mongols/mughals.

Pathians revenged Romans.

Iran revenged zionists by supporting their Muslim jihadi enemies for 40+ years out of Zionist 70 years old.

Etc...

Etc...

Curious, how did Nadir get revenge?
 
Gen Soleimani specifically mentioned the following:

"Ask the ex-commander of your forces in Iraq who he sent to me to ask me to open a window of opportunity by using my influence to stop attacks by Iraqi resistance forces (Mujahedin) on the US soldiers so that they could withdraw from Iraq? Have you forgotten that you had provided adult-size diapers for your battle tank crews? What is your saga and what is the historical background that you rely on for threatening us?"

:omghaha:

Full text of Haj Qassem's speech:

http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13970504000477
All we have seen from them is crying like bitches.

Remeber the American boat incident? damn pants were shitted that day.
 
This will be our next move after Idlib liberation:

1065689797.jpg

Golan Heights' Liberation Possible With 'Endeavor of Syrians' - Iranian Lawmaker
© AFP 2018 / Jalaa Marey
MIDDLE EAST
09:56 29.07.2018(updated 09:57 29.07.2018)Get short URL
3160
MOSCOW (Sputnik) - On Friday, Syrian state flag was raised on the central square of the city of Quneitra, the capital city of the same name province, situated in the Golan Heights in the country's south.

Iranian Parliamentary General Director for International Affairs Hossein Amir-Abdollahian congratulated on Sunday the people of Syria on the victory over militants in the country's city of Quneitra and expressed his confidence that the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights might also be liberated with the "endeavor of Syrians."

"Congratulation to Syria’s people, armed forces and president on the liberation of the city of Quneitra from the clutches of al-Nusra Front* terrorists… The victory means that the liberation of occupied Golan Heights is also possible with the endeavor of Syrians," the lawmaker was quoted as saying by the Iranian Students' News Agency (ISNA).

READ MORE: Israeli Army Hit Launcher in Syria Which Fired Two Rockets Over Border, IDF Says



1066681113.jpg

© SPUTNIK / MIKHAIL VOSKRESENSKY
Daesh Displays Alleged Photos of Syrian Pilot, Jet Downed by Israel - Reports
Tensions over the strategic Golan Heights have intensified in recent weeks amid the Syrian military's efforts to free the country's south from militant groups.


Israel occupied the Golan Heights in the 1967 Six-Day War with Syria and annexed the territory in 1981.

The international community has not recognized the move, which put further strain on the Israeli-Syrian relations.

*al-Nusra Front (also known as Jabhat al-Nusra, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham) is a terrorist group banned in Russia


All we have seen from them is crying like bitches.

Remeber the American boat incident? damn pants were shitted that day.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom