Śakra
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2016
- Messages
- 3,930
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
The librul dilemma
who the **** moves from norway to usa?
Uganda be kidding me, Norway anyone would do that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
who the **** moves from norway to usa?
the only advantage they have is being white which whether you like it or not will hide their shortcomings otherwise the difference in between even germany and the UK are like day and night let alone americans who are an ocean away. i know lots of people from the US and Australia here who are clearly not assimilated despite living here for years. they cant speak the language, stay in their own circles, have very little contact outside their bubble etc. but no one brings that up for the value they have over their country of origin. that my friend is the white (or first world) privilege how much i hate to admit that.Here is the harsh reality...If you have a choice of selective allowance, you would take that choice.
Between Canada and Mexico, Americans would select Canadians. Now let us move to continental Europe. Given what many countries are going thru with their liberal immigration policies, you better believe it that now the citizens are thinking they would rather have people of their own neighborhood -- next door countries -- than from North Africa.
That is the core of what Trump so crudely put it, that if we have the right to select, then we should be selective. Not only that, if we are not selective to countries of origin, then we should be selective about the quality of those allowed to enter. What are the PERCEIVED odds of a Norwegian or a Briton becoming assimilated vs someone from Somalia or Afghanistan ? You can cite statistics all you want, but even you would have the same perception if your country is at stake.
Trump speaking the truth and so do the Norwegians.
https://www.rt.com/news/415700-trump-norway-twitter-immigrants/
Even Norwegians consider US a sh!thole country
We like where we live. In fact, Norway is the happiest country in the world. We are that way because we live in an egalitarian society where we strive to give everyone good and equal opportunities -- regardless of ethnic, gender and social background.
Well... I think the oil helped more than a little bit.
Yeah! Plus the population is super low too.
But I like their foreign ventures as they are not relatively exploitative. Telenor had a JV with local company Grameen Telecom and they revolutionized the cellphone sector in Bangladesh.
It all boils down to one thing: Wealth and developement.the only advantage they have is being white which whether you like it or not will hide their shortcomings otherwise the difference in between even germany and the UK are like day and night let alone americans who are an ocean away. i know lots of people from the US and Australia here who are clearly not assimilated despite living here for years. they cant speak the language, stay in their own circles, have very little contact outside their bubble etc. but no one brings that up for the value they have over their country of origin. that my friend is the white (or first world) privilege how much i hate to admit that.
i dont think when it comes to good quality immigrants from a developed western country like the UK or a "shithole" like india there is much of a difference.
Yes it is indeed. Many people forget that despite its size/population, the U.S has a higher GDP per capital than any country in the world bar small/tiny wealthy countries like Luxembourg, Norway, Switzerland, Ireland, Iceland and Qatar.The fact that US has a GDP per capita of $60K while having a population of 300 million is nothing short of amazing.
The fact that US has a GDP per capita of $60K while having a population of 300 million is nothing short of amazing.
and China's tax system has almost zero tax rate on investment capitial gain, comparing to ~50% in the US.
.
It would be much higher if we didn’t offshore manufacturing in the 1970’s due to pollution laws enacted because our air, water, and soil quality was in steep decline. We’ll take the $60K and be happy with the cleaner environment. We have to live here for generations. If somebody else wants to live with all that pollution well good luck to them.
It’s 15% for low income people and 20% for the rest.
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/how-are-capital-gains-taxed
I got a fellowship and annual stipend of $30K for my PHD in Syracuse this fall so I won't be complaining. US has alot of oppurtunities if one is talented and wants to grow.
Speaking of horrible pollution you might think Syracuse is a quiet little city in the middle of nowhere but it has a history of smokestacks and water/soil pollution from leather tanneries, lead processing, and other fun stuff. So as you walk around enjoying the scenery you can just imagine what it was like 70 years ago.