Tribal Gathering in Kabul Calls for United Front Against Pakistan's Aggressions

[chhota bheem]

Isn't this India's strategy? Before the war, they supported Soviet-backed Afghan strongmen who spent their time assassinating their rivals, torturing political activists and at time sending forces to destroy entire villages? After the Soviet withdrawal, they supported the same strongmen who were now backed by religious fundamentalists, drug traffickers, and warlords. After those strongmen failed, the Taliban took over, and then was overthrown, they went back to supporting them again. Heck, India's usual tactic of explosive defecation, farts and moaning would have been better than what they were doing for the last few tactics. Maybe India isn't the one doing the learning here.

Did something i said sting you very bad,because your post sounded like one goes to sh!t daily and expecting something else everytime.
I know you understand what i ment in my previous post you quoted

My dear they can do all the "telling" they Vaaaant -- but they did Poke Pakistan in the eye by supporting the Blauch separatists -- by leaning towards India -- I don't know why they scream now that Pakistan demands its pound of flesh.

And how conveniently your forget your support to taliab before and after that.

Gave you the account of none other than Bruce Reidel and the best you could come up with is a single line and a blog post. As I said earlier, learn the facts, then bark. Now piss off!

Dod you go through the link or just want to belive what you want to,the reason i posted that link before others is,so that you can see things did not start after the invasion of Afg by ussr,but things have started taking shape before that.

 

[pakistani342]

And how conveniently your forget your support to taliab before and after that.

Seriously? this is your level of knowledge of the subject?

You do know that history did not start with the Taliban -- it started in the 50s with Daoud Khan's support of Pashtun and Bloch separatists ... Pakistan adopted what was called the Afghan forward policy in response.

I think -- like one of the other members here suggested -- it would be a good idea if you do some due diligence on topics that you wish to engage on.

Then there are a lot of nuances to the Taliban support -- Pakistan only supported the Taliban after the Mujahadeen factions were slaughtering each other and razing Afghan cities to the ground. Good is your friend -- you will find that the Afghan people initially celebrated when the Taliban took Kabul -- the violence was that great.

 

[OrionHunter]

It might be sooner that the Afghans realize that they cannot poke Pakistan in the eye.

How?

 

[Xenophon]

Why dont we try JF-17 on these scum ?

 

[Pakistani till death]

I know you are one of them,who belives Pakistan broke USSR.
Sleeping With the Devil: How U.S. and Saudi Backing of Al Qaeda Led to 9/11 Washington's Blog

Chottu tum bata do who defeated ussr in afghanistan and could it have been done without Pakistan? And try to come up with a logical argument instead of giving small unrelated replies!

 

[bdslph]

as they are stating Pakistan is enemy so Pakistan should pushed all bak to afghanistan close all border and start bombing terrorist there

a terrorist knows well Afghanistan is safer

 

[chhota bheem]

Chottu tum bata do who defeated ussr in afghanistan and could it have been done without Pakistan? And try to come up with a logical argument instead of giving small unrelated replies!

Ok i will make it even simpler for you,will you say a movie is directors or a camarman's movie,you can argue a film is not possible with out the cameraman or a lightman,but the move will come out the way the director wants it be.

 

[chhota bheem]

Seriously? this is your level of knowledge of the subject?

You do know that history did not start with the Taliban -- it started in the 50s with Daoud Khan's support of Pashtun and Bloch separatists ... Pakistan adopted what was called the Afghan forward policy in response.

I think -- like one of the other members here suggested -- it would be a good idea if you do some due diligence on topics that you wish to engage on.

Then there are a lot of nuances to the Taliban support -- Pakistan only supported the Taliban after the Mujahadeen factions were slaughtering each other and razing Afghan cities to the ground. Good is your friend -- you will find that the Afghan people initially celebrated when the Taliban took Kabul -- the violence was that great.

Then why stop at 50's why not go further.that's the problem with you guys ,you look things from a narrow point of view
Will you consider 50's Afganistan same as the Afgan of 90's if so then what's the point fighting the USSR.So you can keep the BS about the forward policy to yourself

And regarding people cheering and celebrating taliban taking over,did you see the same people cheering for the coalition forces taking over .that's what people do when the future is not sure and hoping the people who are taking over won't be harsh on them.

 

[Psychic]

Ok i will make it even simpler for you,will you say a movie is directors or a camarman's movie,you can argue a film is not possible with out the cameraman or a lightman,but the move will come out the way the director wants it be.

Idiota! What did US want in Afghanistan in 1975? We had our own issues with Afghans/ Soviets. By your logic, Ho Chi Minh must have been a slave of USSR because it gave the NVA and VC weapons.

 

[chhota bheem]

Idiota! What did US want in Afghanistan in 1975? We had our own issues with Afghans/ Soviets. By your logic, Ho Chi Minh must have been a slave of USSR because it gave the NVA and VC weapons.

dude i agree ,you belive Pakistan broke USSR and i am not trying to make you belive otherwise,i just dont to bang my head on the wall and yet dont want you to look stupid as well infront of others by asking questions like what did US want in Afganistan ,please find out what was cold war all about. Google

 

[Psychic]

dude i agree ,you belive Pakistan broke USSR and i am not trying to make you belive otherwise,i just dont to bang my head on the wall and yet dont want you to look stupid as well infront of others by asking questions like what did US want in Afganistan ,please find out what was cold war all about. Google

Learn the meaning of mutual interests first and then study when US got involved in Afghan war, finally when u r ready, then debate...ta ta

 

[pakistani342]

Then why stop at 50's why not go further.that's the problem with you guys ,you look things from a narrow point of view
Will you consider 50's Afganistan same as the Afgan of 90's if so then what's the point fighting the USSR.So you can keep the BS about the forward policy to yourself

And regarding people cheering and celebrating taliban taking over,did you see the same people cheering for the coalition forces taking over .that's what people do when the future is not sure and hoping the people who are taking over won't be harsh on them.

no my it is not a problem with us -- sure go back further than the 50s -- there is a notion of when to start the clock so to speak. We can start the clock in:
1. before the 50s -- thought most people would be dismissive of things that approach a 4 generation epic -- but nothing stops us. For example Afghans will gloat that they conquered territories that are not Pakistan and enslave the populace -- so I guess it should be ok if Pakistan pays the favor back?
2. 50s -- yes that goes in the favor of Pakistan
3. 80s -- again they invited the USSR in contrary to what Afghans phrase it selectively an innovation
4. 90s -- again the warring factions could not reach a peace accord
5. 2000s -- they tilted heavily towards India -- the rest is shall we say -- recent history

And, please do not use the word BS -- you insult yourself -- only imbecile like yourself would come here and argue without having put in the sweat equity to research the subject.

The point was that the Taliban brought peace compared to India's allies that were already in power -- all your gibberish in the world does not change what happened.

It would be better if you spent some time studying history before jumping into the fray.

 

[chhota bheem]

no my it is not a problem with us -- sure go back further than the 50s -- there is a notion of when to start the clock so to speak. We can start the clock in:
1. before the 50s -- thought most people would be dismissive of things that approach a 4 generation epic -- but nothing stops us. For example Afghans will gloat that they conquered territories that are not Pakistan and enslave the populace -- so I guess it should be ok if Pakistan pays the favor back?
2. 50s -- yes that goes in the favor of Pakistan
3. 80s -- again they invited the USSR in contrary to what Afghans phrase it selectively an innovation
4. 90s -- again the warring factions could not reach a peace accord
5. 2000s -- they tilted heavily towards India -- the rest is shall we say -- recent history

And, please do not use the word BS -- you insult yourself -- only imbecile like yourself would come here and argue without having put in the sweat equity to research the subject.

The point was that the Taliban brought peace compared to India's allies that were already in power -- all your gibberish in the world does not change what happened.

It would be better if you spent some time studying history before jumping into the fray.

This is what i said

And how conveniently your forget your support to taliab before and after that.

and you said

You do know that history did not start with the Taliban -- it started in the 50s with Daoud Khan's support of Pashtun and Bloch separatists ... Pakistan adopted what was called the Afghan forward policy in response.

For which i asked

Will you consider 50's Afganistan same as the Afgan of 90's if so then what's the point fighting the USSR.So you can keep the BS about the forward policy to yourself

On one you started by said Afgans supported balouch seperatists in 50's thats why you started what ever policy towards Afganistan and you are doing the same after the soviets left Afganistan.afterall the same people where fighting among themselfs in Afganistan whom you were supporting before.
The BS i said was for you trying to justify the support to taliban.

 

[pakistani342]

This is what i said


and you said

For which i asked

On one you started by said Afgans supported balouch seperatists in 50's thats why you started what ever policy towards Afganistan and you are doing the same after the soviets left Afganistan.afterall the same people where fighting among themselfs in Afganistan whom you were supporting before.
The BS i said was for you trying to justify the support to taliban.

I consider myself fairly articulate in the English language and I have no idea what you are trying to say.

Plus, my arguments are not new -- you can check my older postings

 

[I.R.A]

If you chicken hearts cannot appreciate the capability and will of a small country then at least keep your mouths shut instead of spreading BS and giving the false impression that Pakistan can't do anything.

You are expecting a lot from enemy, in fact a back stabbing enemy.

For elders of Afghanistan, I never wanted to say this but you filthy scums don't leave me a choice, if you were such brave hearts and warriors you would have preferred to die first then to let your women get raped in prisons and in your homes. I don't know how you breath on this Earth while your women bear children of rape. Enough of your ghairat ka tamasha the more you go this way the more things will become difficult for millions of you living like parasites in Pakistan.

Well I don't know why I am wasting my energy when I already know whose words and wishes these sold outs are spewing.