That is just a false brand that came about 70 years ago. I am talking about the civilization, culture and a wonder called India. Don't you know in the Upanishads India is said to be that land from Pushupura [Peshawar] to Vanga Sea [Bengal Sea] to the land of Coconuts [Sri Lanka]. Everything is India.
While I opened this thread to take a crack at trhe "India, India, India" crowd but let's not kid ourselves. Pakistan and people of Pakistan extraction have a problem with terrorism. The virus pool is in Pakistan and from that source it spreads across the family links to Pakistanis abroad even as far as London, San Barnandino, New York etc. The India despite being vastly in larger numbers are not afflicted. Indeed a study to look at why Indians have on whole not been drawn to terrorism abroad but Pakistanis have would be illustrative and expose the problem at the very heart of the narrative cultivated by the Pakistani state which has been so destructive. Instead of fostering a sense of united nation state it produced a mass of confused people with divergent pulls of a nation state and and identity as a 'Muslim'.
That is just a false brand that came about 70 years ago. I am talking about the civilization, culture and a wonder called India. Don't you know in the Upanishads India is said to be that land from Pushupura [Peshawar] to Vanga Sea [Bengal Sea] to the land of Coconuts [Sri Lanka]. Everything is India.
While I opened this thread to take a crack at trhe "India, India, India" crowd but let's not kid ourselves. Pakistan and people of Pakistan extraction have a problem with terrorism. The virus pool is in Pakistan and from that source it spreads across the family links to Pakistanis abroad even as far as London, San Barnandino, New York etc. The India despite being vastly in larger numbers are not afflicted. Indeed a study to look at why Indians have on whole not been drawn to terrorism abroad but Pakistanis have would be illustrative and expose the problem at the very heart of the narrative cultivated by the Pakistani state which has been so destructive. Instead of fostering a sense of united nation state it produced a mass of confused people with divergent pulls of a nation state and and identity as a 'Muslim'.
And to the Indians. The point I am making is if anything remotely is positive and comes from region coterminous to Pakistan the whole lot of you will go and try appropriating by singing the "India, India, India" card. Here I am playing it back to you guys but I notice because the incident is not positive - indeed it is big negative your all fast to distance from it.
Keep that in mind next time you place your grubby hands on the region coterminous to Pakistan.
So you took your time to go technical on your Mistake.... that's Clever 
, because the term Pakistan came into existence just 70 years ago ......
to use word Indian subcontinent instead of Pakistan Not facts... but the titles such as Senior and Elite are given by the post count but the ThinkTankAnalyst are positioned for the clever people who thinks differently don't you think???? but this thread proved us wrong...
and with his last answer to me, he made fool out of Ross Geller.
Dont you think its a different way of thinking
Come on guys. Read the OP. I intended to take a dig at the whole "India, India, India" thing you people play. I knew within two seconds of reading the BBC news that it was almost 95% that the perpetrator was of Pakistani extraction. In UK the biggest threat from terrorism is from within the UK Pakistani population. This is known fact. And I am not and never known for hiding this. Because to ignore this would mean we never will identitfy the cause. And I know the problem is not within the ex-pat Pakistanis per se but is in Pakistan. But because all the ex-pat Pakistanis have roots in Pakistan, famnily links, marriage links, they naturally are influenced by what goes on there. The infection of radicalism is in Pakistan and it has spread through family/travel links to ex-pats abroad be they in USA, Canada or UK.So you took your time to go technical on your Mistake.... that's Clever
Yes. Inspired by how you guy's use that "Indian sub-continent" to claim all our heritage. It was a dig at you guys.Dont you think its a different way of thinking
Dont you think its a different way of thinking
in it ...... Now out of the blue ISC has appeared..... or to say India never existed before 47 .......... naa we dont need IVC , to prove something .. we have grown beyond that and it will be difficult for them to digest the religion of Indus valley Civilization and the current religion of Pakistanis Ironic isn't it.... when Alexander was stooped in the north west they cliaimed it was the pakistanis.. there's no Indian Sub continent
I don't think that. I was playing along the common Indian sentiment that we hear everyday. Let us for instance imagine that in the village that this Canadian Pakistani comes from in Pakistan they find ancient example of writing. Trust me every one of you guys would be barking "India, India, India". And if we said it was found in Pakistan you would fall back on the Indian su-continent and that Pakistan only came into being in 1947 blah blah. That was my point.
Idiot I have already stated I said "Indian sub-continent" to take a dig. If you can't understand that well your beyond help.
