joseph sir i need some answer. a responsiable news paper like times of india or at least the editor should have some sence before copy pasting news from other news papers
Because Indian media is a puppet state of USA. Why deny it?
Its information warfare. Americans are good at it.
From time to time, so called "South Asia" experts in USA plant stories in local media which their Indian media counterparts "copy" faithfully as good servants.
India doesn't have any "code of conduct" or regulations yet on local Print media, which should make it compulsary for them to provide foreign source when they copy stories from Western media.
For example, ToI tell its readers that 50% of their "experts" views on local matters are actually copied from foreign experts based in Washington?
India media is a classic bootlicker of Gora's a$$. They will do anything for money. And western media exploits this nicely to create hate-propaganda in Indian public against China. The worse thing is that, now "indian" experts have shifted to Washington, NY and they make their reports on situation in Indian region in New york. That's how its working.
Its not coincidental that China has negative image in India. Its "managed" through such reports.
Also, India has accepted that Tibet is part of China but USA doesn't want to. Americans are vengeful about Vietnam defeats and are doing everything to create unrest in China.
First you create jehadis and then make victims(India) to come to you for help. Typical american policy.
China is not stupid to goto war with neighbours and let West win. Good example is 1971, when China refused American advise to launch war on India.
1962 war was due to puppet fool Nehru who allowed open access to CIA in Indian North-east borders with China, who used it to create havoc in Chinese Tibet border regions. China had to protect its territory from Indian invasions(CIA operated) and they did. Delhi will never accept this publicly because foolish Indian egos will get hurt.
Honestly speaking, India had no right over Tibet. This "Tibet should be free" philosophy first came from West and Nehru was big supporter of this. This only created tensions between Asian biggies. What India gained from 1962? Nothing. It created divide in two big civilizations. Only West profited from it.
Even if there were any freedom movement in Tibet, it was none of India's business to poke its nose into Tibet. Tibet wasn't Indian territory. It did only because West was pushing Nehru on it and Nehru foolishly supported it. What was the need of it? India was deep in poverty during 1950's and this idiot(Nehru) was interested in poking his nose, in Tibet? What a moron he was!
Americans used foolish leadership of India to create tensions in Tibet and the stupid Nehru realized his mistakes when China retaliated hard and he had to quickly retreat his forces.
What he was thinking? He wanted to take India to war over China for Tibet? For which Tibet? How many Indians were living in Tibet during 1950's? Did India had claim over Tibet in history? Whose war India was fighting? Even this fool wasn't sure of it. How he can be, when his masters(UK+USA) were thinking for him.
I thank Vajpayee for taking sensible step of recognizing Tibet as part of China. Congress(whose puppet Nehru created tensions with China) would never accept their blunders.
Yes China is evil because it will protect its lands at any cost which everyone does including India. So its hypocritical of us(Indians), to call China evil just because they are more brave than Indians, who can't even protect its Kashmir citizens properly. But USA is bigger evil which gave birth to problems(Kashmir,Tibet,Taiwan,Taliban,Vietnam genocide).
