What's new

Top agents in secret trip to Pakistan

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Top agents in secret trip to Pakistan By PAMELA HESS

WASHINGTON - The top two U.S. intelligence officials made a secret visit to Pakistan in early January to seek permission from President Pervez Musharraf for greater involvement of American forces in trying to ferret out al-Qaida and other militant groups active in the tribal regions along the Afghanistan border, a senior U.S. official said.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity given the secret nature of the talks, declined to disclose what was said, but Musharraf was quoted two days after the Jan. 9 meeting as saying U.S. troops would be regarded as invaders if they crossed into Pakistan to hunt al-Qaida militants.

The New York Times — which first reported on the secret visit by CIA Director Michael Hayden and Mike McConnell, director of national intelligence — said Musharraf rebuffed an expansion of an American presence in Pakistan at the meeting, either through overt CIA. missions or by joint operations with Pakistani security forces.

Pakistan has been under growing U.S. pressure to crack down on militants in its tribal regions close to the Afghan border, a rugged area long considered a likely hiding place for al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and his top deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, as well as an operating ground for Taliban militants planning attacks on coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Several U.S. presidential candidates have hinted they would support unilateral action in the area.

In a Jan. 11 interview, Musharraf told The Straits Times of Singapore that U.S. troops would "certainly" be considered invaders if they set foot in the tribal regions. "If they come without our permission, that's against the sovereignty of Pakistan," he said. "I challenge anybody coming into our mountains. They would regret that day."

South Waziristan is a semiautonomous region where the central government has never had much control. It is home to scores of al-Qaida and Taliban fighters, many of whom fled there from neighboring Afghanistan after the U.S-led invasion in 2001.

The border region emerged as a front line in the war on extremist groups after Musharraf allied Pakistan with the U.S. following the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Washington has given Pakistan billions of dollars in aid to help government forces battle militants.

Musharraf, who toured Europe last week seeking support for his embattled government, rejected claims that the violence was a sign of a resurgent Taliban. More than 150 rebels and soldiers are reported to have been killed in the region this month alone.

Musharraf in the past has credited cooperation between Pakistani intelligence services and the CIA, both of whom believe that Pakistani militant leader Baitullah Mehsud was the mastermind of the Dec. 27 gun and suicide bomb attack that killed former prime minister Benazir Bhutto.

But the State Department's counterterrorism chief, Dell Dailey, said Tuesday that the Bush administration was displeased with "gaps in intelligence" received from Pakistan about the activities of extremist groups in the tribal regions.

"We don't have enough information about what's going on there. Not on al-Qaida. Not on foreign fighters. Not on the Taliban," he said.

Dailey, a retired Army lieutenant general with extensive background in special operations, said Pakistan needs to fix the problem. However, said the U.S. wasn't likely to conduct military strikes inside Pakistan on its own, saying that would anger many Pakistanis.

Rather than allow an increased U.S. presence, the Times reported that Pakistan and the United States are discussing other joint efforts, such as increased use of armed Predator surveillance aircraft over the tribal areas, and identifying ways the U.S. can speed intelligence information to Pakistani security forces.

The paper said the Jan. 9 trip by McConnell and Hayden came five days after senior administration officials debated new strategies for dealing with Pakistan. It had reported previously that no decisions were made at that meeting of the National Security Council, which included top administration officials, but not President Bush.

The times quoted a senior officials as saying "the purpose of the mission (by McConnell and Hayden) was to convince Musharraf that time is ticking away" and that the increased attacks on Pakistan would ultimately undermine his effort to stay in office.
 
Well I guess their secret trip accomplished nothing. They can make a thousand trips and they will still get the same answer.
 
The times quoted a senior officials as saying "the purpose of the mission (by McConnell and Hayden) was to convince Musharraf that time is ticking away" and that the increased attacks on Pakistan would ultimately undermine his effort to stay in office.

:P :P So they were pressurizing Musharraf basically threatening him that if he did not allow US forces inn, his stay in power would be undermined.

and at the End they had already started keeping him out.
 
Assalamulaykum,

It seems to be another attempt to some how situate themselves on the lands of another realm!

How tenacious people can be at times...

Allah Hafiz
 
Hi,

Another mistake by the americans in asking pakistan army to inculde american troops against any assault on taliban. What are the americans thinking--have they lost all common sense---do they have such poor quality advisors---or is it intentional---keep Musharaf and pakistan at the back foot all the time---keep them in a defensive posture---keep them busy in answering and justifying their position---keep them unstable---.

The F 16 delivery was the key to american succes in pakistan against the taliban---americans lost the edge for wasting so much time in delivering the planes---ironically some in congress and senate are again talking about sanctions---.
 
The F 16 delivery was the key to american succes in pakistan against the taliban---americans lost the edge for wasting so much time in delivering the planes---ironically some in congress and senate are again talking about sanctions.

They can talk about sanctions all they want but I know for a fact that they will not impose sanctions on Pakistan in the near future. They need us right now, only when they dont need us they will spit us out and them impose sanctions on us.
 
IMO we are reading too much in this visit.Top level co-operation with USA Intelligence agencies has been going on for many years. Why do we presume that Mushy was being pressurised? It could be just exchange of info.

As for the US congress, let us not forget that BB herself was lobbying for the US Aid to be linked with the restoration of democracy. Nawaz Sharif has been saying the same for 8 years. There are three lobbies acting against Pakistan's interests in the US. Jewish Lobby, Indian Lobby and our own politicians trying to curry favour with the US media and the Legislature.

Let us put the balme where it lies and this includes opportunistic Pakistanis as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom