krash
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2009
- Messages
- 5,885
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
Zia without doubt is guilty and his legacy is toxic. However the issue in Pakistan runs deeper. The fault lies in the very DNA of Pakistan and it needs fixing.
This DNA was a fair bit different before him, though. Bhutto brought the rabid mullah to the stage, Zia unchained them. A society of hundreds of millions of poor, uneducated, and destitute was the perfect breeding ground for rabid illiterate hatred.
The Objectives Resolution declares that sovereignty belongs to Allah. From religious POV this is fine but from practical and political POV this is recipe for disaster.
If the state says sovereignty belongs to Allah what stops the next Ashiq lover to invoke that and say he is acting on behalf of a higher authority and demands XYZ what do you do? This will problem will keep coming up.
That's a misconception. There is 1400 years worth of academic work done on that issue within Islamic Jurisprudence. For example, any transgression against law is forbidden even if it's a Non-Muslim state, even if the law is un-Islamic. However, the point I am trying to make is that once you take rabid illiterate mobs out of the picture, you make room for discussion, debate, and education. Evolution for the better follows naturally, the pace is relative.
Last edited: