Featured Time to bury the past and move forward: COAS Bajwa

[Abdulrehman 2978]

Remind the BJP, Sanghis and other right-wing Indians (a majority voted for the BJP) that still hold a strong animus towards Pakistan merely for existing, because 'it divided Akhand Bharat'.

Well we aren't BJP or hinduvta terrorists right?. We are Pakistanis and we are different than these pajeets.

 

[H!TchHiker]

Mashallah...from taking backing amendment regarding kashmir before any talks resume to let's bury the past...
This constant begging to India for talks is quite interesting...it seems current regime wants to settle the kashmir like musharaf ..and make LoC permanent border ....such a pesimistic view indeed ..please india talk to Pakistan....federal minister of current government has literally called kashmiri leader gillani as supporter of indians facisit regime ...last I heard this type of remarks for kashmiri leader when Mushraf was in charge

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

How can we forgot all our Kashmiris sisters and brothers ?

Did so many of you really miss the part where he specifically referred to the resolution of the Jammu & Kashmir dispute being critical to moving forward, and the onus on resolving that dispute being on India?

a general telling he wants peace.... is simply afraid of war !

A general who doesn't talk of peace while being prepared for war is foolish, irresponsible and will likely lead everyone into disaster.

As the adage goes, "speak softly but carry a big stick".

 

[Air Wolf]

Well we aren't BJP or hinduvta terrorists right?. We are Pakistanis and we are different than these pajeets.

Don't try to be too different for your own good.

 

[Abdulrehman 2978]

We will take back kashmir and junagadh but first we need to fix our country.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Well we aren't BJP or hinduvta terrorists right?. We are Pakistanis and we are different than these pajeets.

What I'm pointing out is that his comments were directed more at the Indians - it is they who need to bury and forget the past and their animus towards Pakistan for merely existing and Akhand Bharat and all that nonsense, and work towards a cooperative and prosperous future by resolving the Jammu & Kashmir dispute.

Question is why? Why another offer for peace? Why sound so desperate? They haven't offered even once and we are offering again and again. WHY?

Because we have the weaker image internationally after decades of Indian propaganda. The offer of peace is also very conditional to India taking the first steps on resolving the J&K dispute.

Perhaps everyone needs to actually read the speech properly & understand the context instead of doing what Pakistani anchors do and cherry pick statements out of context here and there.

 

[Abdulrehman 2978]

What I'm pointing out is that his comments were directed more at the Indians - it is they who need to bury and forget the past and their animus towards Pakistan for merely existing and Akhand Bharat and all that nonsense, and work towards a cooperative and prosperous future by resolving the Jammu & Kashmir dispute.

On one side we have Indians that don't want to recognize Pakistan. On other side we have afghanis who don't want to recognize durand line. Every side we have enemies.

 

[Avatar]

Absolutely agree with COAS. We must work sincerely to resolve the Kashmir dispute and both parties must find the right mutual compromise for a prosperous future. Give peace a chance.

 

[Quibbler]

The ground reality seems to percolating into the Paksitani leadership after their initial cacophony on 370's abolition.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

On one side we have Indians that don't want to recognize Pakistan. On other side we have afghanis who don't want to recognize durand line. Every side we have enemies.

Constantly yelling and screaming at the enemies, like the Afghans & Indians do to us, will only turn us into a laughing stock like the Indians and Indian military leadership have become.

Respect is not earned through hysterical war-mongering. Even the US lost respect internationally under Trump by following that policy.

 

[HRK]

No harm in stating that we want peace over and over,

And the cost of Peace .... ???

Why only one side bear the cost and Peace ..... ???

Why only One side shoulder the burden of Peace .... ???

There is ONLY ONE Peaceful solution of Kashmir which is the implementation of UN resolution avoid this and try to resolve issue of Kashmir by any other way it will only lead towards more disputes and war or war like situation.

I thought they made that clear - move forward by resolving the Kashmir dispute

Question is How .... ??

My dear IF they can't resolve it now as per the wishes of people of Kashmir then they should leave it as it is rather create more mess. Just don't try to get Kashmir dispute resolved from the 'Position of Weakness'

 

[Vortex]

Did so many of you really miss the part where he specifically referred to the resolution of the Jammu & Kashmir dispute being critical to moving forward, and the onus on resolving that dispute being on India?

thanks bro. My blood boiled when I red the title.

but in my humble opinion it should NOT be the COAS to make such statements but to politicians

yes it’s Pakistan.

 

[mudas777]

Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa said on Thursday that lasting peace in the sub-continent will remain elusive until the resolution of the Kashmir issue, stressing that it was time for India and Pakistan to "bury the past and move forward".
Addressing the audience on day two of the first-ever Islamabad Security Dialogue, Gen Bajwa noted that stable Indo-Pak relations were the key to unlocking the potential of South and Central Asia by ensuring connectivity between East and West Asia.

But this potential has always remained hostage to the disputes and issues between the two "nuclear neighbours", he said.

"The Kashmir issue is obviously at the heart of this. It is important to understand that without the resolution of Kashmir dispute through peaceful means, [the] process of sub-continental rapprochement will always remain susceptible to derailment due to politically motivated bellicosity."

See: Full text of Gen Bajwa's speech at the Islamabad Security Dialogue

"We feel it is time to bury the past and move forward," he said, adding that the onus for meaningful dialogue rested with India. "Our neighbour will have to create a conducive environment, particularly in occupied Kashmir."

Bajwa's comments come a day after Prime Minister Imran Khan said that India would have to make the first move to normalise ties with Pakistan.

“We are trying, but India would have to take the first step and unless it does that we cannot move ahead,” the prime minister had said while inaugurating the two-day dialogue.

The prime minister, however, did not elaborate what he expected India to do as the first step to resumption of ties.

'Multi-dimensional challenges'
Commenting on national security challenges, the army chief said: "The world has seen the ravages of the world wars and the Cold War, wherein polarisation and neglect of virtues blighted the future and brought catastrophic consequences for humanity.

"Today the leading drivers of change in the world are demography, economy and technology.

"However, one issue that remains central to this concept is economic security and cooperation. Frayed relations between various powers centres of the globe and boomeranging of competing alliances can bring nothing but another stint of Cold War."

History has taught us that the way ahead has always been through an inter-connected, inter-dependent and collective sense of security, he said,

The army chief added that it was naive to apply the failed solution of yesteryears to the challenges of today and tomorrow. "It is important for the world that leading global players must reach a stable equilibrium through convergence instead of divergence."

In this environment, developing countries like Pakistan face multi-dimensional challenges which cannot be be navigated single-handedly, he said, adding that a similar situation was being faced by other countries in the region.

"Therefore, we all require multi-lateral, global and regional approach and cooperation to overcome these challenges."

'Disputes dragging South Asia back into poverty'
The COAS also stated that unsettled issues in South Asia are dragging the entire region back into poverty and underdevelopment.

"It is sad to know that even today it [South Asia] is amongst the least integrated regions of the world in terms of trade, infrastructure, water and energy cooperation.

"On top of it, despite being impoverished, we end up spending a lot of our money on defence, which naturally comes at the expense of human development."

He also noted that "despite rising security challenges, Pakistan has been one of the few [countries] that has resisted the temptation of involving itself in an arms race", citing a decrease in the country's defence expenditure.

"This has not been easy, especially when you live in a hostile and unstable neighbourhood. But having said that, let me say that we are ready to improve our environment by resolving all our outstanding issues with our neighbours through dialogue in a dignified and peaceful manner," he said.

The army chief stated that this was "deliberate and based on rationality" and not as a result of any "pressure".

"We have learned from the past and are willing to move ahead towards a new future. However, this is contingent on reciprocity."

He said that Pakistan intended to leverage its geo-strategic location for its own regional and global benefit.

Afghan peace process
The army chief also praised Pakistan for its "robust role" in the current quest for peace in Afghanistan and said that it was proof of the country's "good will and understanding of global and moral obligations".

Commenting on the historic peace deal between the United States and Taliban, Bajwa attributed it to Pakistan's close collaboration and support for the peace process which paved the way for intra-Afghan dialogue.

In addition to offering support to the Afghan peace process, Pakistan also took unprecedented steps to enhance Kabul's trade and connectivity, the army chief said.

Pakistan's economic potential
The army chief also said that Pakistan was a country with "tremendous" economic potential, adding that it was important for the country to embark on a solid roadmap to carve a promising future for the people.

He maintained that the geo-economic region was centered around four main pillars: moving towards lasting and enduring peace within and outside, non-interference of any kind in the affairs of our neighbours and regional countries, boosting intra-regional trade and connectivity, bringing sustainable development and prosperity through establishment of investment and economic hubs.

Pakistan has been working towards all four aspects, he said. "We had realised that unless our own house was in order, nothing could be expected from the outside."

He said that after combatting terrorism and extremism, Pakistan had moved towards working on sustainable development and improving the economic condition of underdeveloped areas.

Gen Bajwa noted that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) had been at the heart of Pakistan's economic transformation plan and the country had sought to make the project inclusive, transparent and attractive for all global and regional players.

But "while CPEC remains central to our vision, only seeing Pakistan through [the] CPEC prism is also misleading", the army chief stressed.

He said Pakistan's vital geostrategic location and a transformed vision made it a country of immense and diverse potential which could very positively contribute to regional development and prosperity.

"This vision, however, remains incomplete without a stable and peaceful South Asia," he said, adding that Pakistan's efforts for reviving Saarc and for peace in Afghanistan, and its "responsible and mature behaviour in crisis situation with India" manifested its desire to "change the narrative of geo-political contestation into geo-economic integration".

The COAS emphasised: "It is time that we in South Asia create synergy through connectivity, peaceful co-existence and resource sharing to fight hunger, illiteracy and disease instead of fighting each other."

National security
Congratulating the National Security Division on organising the dialogue, Bajwa stated that the contemporary concept of national security was not just about protecting countries from an external and internal threat.

It is also about providing a conducive environment for ensuring human security, national progress and development, he said.

"Surely, it is not solely the function of the armed forces anymore," he said, adding that national security in the age of globalisation, information and connectivity had become an "all encompassing notion".

"National security is thus multi-layered. The outer layer being the exogenous factors of the global and regional environment, and the internal layers being indigenous factors of internal peace, stability and developmental orientation.

"A nation at peace and a region at harmony are thus essential pre-requisites for attaining national security in the true spirit."

Whether it be extremism, human rights, environmental hazards or the pandemic, "responding in silos is no more an option", he said.
Time to bury the past and move forward: COAS Bajwa on Indo-Pak ties

Read More at: https://www.dawn.com/news/1613200/time-to-bury-the-past-and-move-forward-coas-bajwa-on-indo-pak-ties
---------
While Pak Civil-military have extended a hand towards India to resolve the issue, there remain certain questions which should be answered,
1 - Is India interested in dialogue with Pakistan, keeping in view that Pakistan has been unable to change the status quo after 1948.
2 - Indian current stance is that there shouldn't be any dialogue on Indian held Kashmir, how would Pakistan expect to start dialogue when there is no discussion on Indian held Kashmir?
3 - What if India proposes to convert LOC into a permanent border and terms it the only condition of peace with Pakistan. What would be Pakistan's stance on that?

When you read between the lines and all with the statesman like wording we can't be sold a sugar coated solution. Kashmir must be be resolved according to the UN resolution's nothing short of it will do. Establishment or no establishment our nation have to agree and decide the final outcome.
No pressures and no back door selling out Kashmiri's right and only just solution will do. We are all for the connectivity, developments and IPADS and ludo's and so forth but not at the price of our lands, people which rightfully belongs to us. These kind of statements elected PM gives to the nation not a job of the establishment.

 

[HRK]

Tu phir ham Kashmir ko Azad samjhain?

sawal ya hai kon se walay .... Kashmir ko .... ???

 

[H!TchHiker]

A generals job is to ensure defense of country in case of enemy's invasion. His job isn't to start a war. I thought it was to clear to people that Pakistans forces are for defensive purposes and not for invasion.

Yes general job is to secure a country defense in time of war and continue preparation in peace time rather sending applications to enemy for peace ...