What's new

Thoughts on advancing Pakistan's aviation industry

CriticalThought

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Messages
7,094
Reaction score
13
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
DISCLAIMER: This article represents the author's own individual thoughts. The author has no links with PAF, PAC, AvDI or any other aerospace organization, and certainly does not have access to any private and/or classified information relating to the activities and roadmap of PAF, PAC, AvDI or any other aerospace organization.

Countries pursue industrialization with different end goals. For economic powerhouses like USA and China, their continued survival relies on a relentless pursuit of industrial excellence. Their size justifies their goal of end-to-end vertical integration to create entire products on-shore. Others, such as Sweden, South Korea, and Israel, lack such depth, but substitute it with specialization in key areas, while integrating best of the breed systems from the global market.

Pakistan's position is unique in that it is viewed with suspicion and derision throughout the world. As such, even the doors of integrating best of the breed systems into a product tailored for its own needs are pretty much closed on it. It is thus incredible to see the PAF rising, against all odds, like a phoenix from the ashes of industrial backwardness in Pakistan. Indeed, JF-17 is the pride of Pakistan, and represents some of the highest levels of manufacturing technology being utilized to create a world class product.

And yet, the manufacturing plant of JF-17 does not represent an indigenous capability to produce aircraft tailored to our needs. The JF-17 is a result of many compromises, both economic and technological. More importantly, it is a Transfer of Technology, wherein, tools, techniques, and processes have been handed over, allowing replication ad nauseum.

Thankfully, PAF is fully aware of the situation and is, in fact, one step ahead of the game. The MoDP Yearbook for FY16-17 describes the creation of an Aviation Design Institute. The exact words from the year book are as follows

http://modp.gov.pk/modp/userfiles1/file/Year Book 2015-16 Part-II.pdf
In the light of latest global trends, PAC realized that design and development is mandatory to be competitive and for achieving self reliance. Presently, PAC is fully involved in MRO, avionics systems development and aircraft production; while design and development of new aviation products is the missing link. In this regard, an Aviation Design Institute (AvDI) at PAC is formed, to spearhead design and development activity. The AvDI’s working model hinges on leveraging existing National Human Resource and facilities, which is the emerging global trend for national progress. It is envisaged that with formation of AvDI, PAC will have its own product line and aims to embark on state of the art next generation aerospace vehicles, thereby making PAC a complete aviations solution provider in Pakistan.

PAF rightfully deserves our salutations for being progress and displaying such thought leadership. Yet, for the keen reader, the description above leaves many open questions. What are the products on which AvDI will be working on? What level, or depth, of indigenization will be targeted? Which systems and components will be indigenized? Unfortunately, not much is known about these details in the public realm. In this article, I wish to analyze the most pressing needs for which PAF needs world class indigenous solutions. It is my hope to instigate a healthy discourse on the topic, and the resulting synergy of intellects would shine light on the way forward for PAF, and indeed, for Pakistan.

In terms of power projection, PAF sorely lacks one crucial element: a modern, hi-tech, medium weight fighter jet in sufficiently large numbers, that does not face the lingering threat of sanctions. Opinion varies as to whether this should be a strike figher, or an air superiority fighter. This author believes that the army should be fully capable of both air defence (through mobile SAMs and MANPADs) and air attack (through attack helicopters, drones, and missiles). This leaves PAF with three major tasks:

1. Establishing air superiority on land and sea by attacking aerial and air defence assets in the air, on the ground, and at sea.

2. Deep penetration within enemy territory to strike high value targets.

3. Attacking naval assets at sea.

Note that the real world is not ideal, and PAF must retain its capabilities for CAS so it can deliver whenever the need arises. In this article, we shall not pursue this angle further. Note further that 2 and 3 above are best served by a fifth generation stealth bomber, something that is best acquired through China. This leaves us with the air superiority role.

PAF's theatre of operations spreads from some of the world's tallest peaks in the north to the vast expanses of the Arabian sea in the south. Within this vast arena, PAF fighters encounter tortuous deserts, lush plains, rugged mountains, and frozen glaciers. A front line, medium weight air superiority fighter must be able to perform its duties in the full range of these environments. For ease of reference, from here onwards, we shall term this air superiority fighter as Spark (of lightning preceding the Thunder).

I envision PAF's standard air combat package being led by two Sparks that are supported by four Thunders. The air superiority fighter must excel at EW, SEAD, BVR, as well as WVR combat. If we sit back and deliberate upon this situation, we realize that the Thunders have enough corner speed, and will only get better with Block 3. Hence, we assign the role of hi-lo pincer to our air superiority fighter. We require:

1. Excellent super sonic handling.
2. Excellent rate of climb.
3. Ability to fire at targets located anywhere within the sphere.
4. Low observable features.

In order to achieve these objects, I envisage a tailless, large delta wing aircraft, with a high sweep angle vertical stabilizer and no canards. The air intake should be situated below the fuselage, thus making the design inherently unstable in the pitch axis. Avid readers will note that this design looks very much like the F-16 XL.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-16XL

In terms of indigenous production of such a fighter, we concentrate on two areas: the airframe, and the engine.

If AvDI is to take up indigenous design and development of the airframe, it will need super computing facilities, modern wind tunnels, and stress testing equipment at a minimum. The final design may very well turn out to be nothing like the F-16XL, but it provides a credible base to start from. It will also need capabilities for the production and machining of various aviation grades alloys and composites, which will have to be selected by designers as needed. Even if Chinese help is utilized in setting up and operationalizing this infrastructure, we envisage a project of four to five years, at the end of which, AvDI will produce a working prototype whose performance can be tested through actual flight tests. This would be a momentous occasion in the history of Pakistan, and would represent our advancement into the exclusive league of nations that have an indigenous capability for the design and development of hi-tech systems.

In order to be relevant well int the 21st century, PAF's front line fighter must be designed around a truly world class engine. Recent news gives indications about the possibility of a collaboration between Rolls Royce and PAF. Even if it becomes a reality, this project will be defined by the needs of the Turkish TFX program. Here again, the restrictions being faced by PAF mean that if it is to benefit from a world class engine, it is mostly on its own.

Many would see the task of indigenous engine development as being too onerous for the likes of PAF. And the fact of the matter is that this is a huge challenge. But if steps and measures are not put into place today, PAF will continue to face this problem well into the future. So, what can PAF do to surmount this challenge in the long term?

It should be noted that a turbo engine is needed, not just for fighter jets, but also for cruise missiles. Fortunately, cruise missiles fall into the purvey of SPD, and strategic national defence for the delivery of nukes is a very high priority. There are many parallels in the technology for creating a stealth cruise missile and a jet fighter. Interestingly, amongst many other commonalities, is the matter of a turbo engine. Thus, strategic national defence demands investment in the area of indigenous turbo engine design, development, and production. I would like PAF to leverage this need and launch a turbo engine program in consort with SPD.

In the end, it is up to PAF's leadership to assign roadmap items to AvDI. This author will wait anxiously for further details to be made public via official sources. Meanwhile, I would like to invite everyone to share their thoughts and critiques on this topic.
 
. .
Here's a point which I think is crucial.

Figure out a way to make all these developments, that you require, to bring the manufacturer/researcher some economic benefit. Otherwise, only small and absolutely necessary funds go into R&D. Making projects financially viable usually means finding a viable civilian commercial use for the tech you develop. It is hard to keep on pumping money in the name of national interest with little or no monetary return. They've done this for the JF-17 by designing it from the onset to be exported. Ideally, whatever you develop should pay for itself. The American Military Industrial Complex is so advanced because it is profitable and not just because it needs to be for strategic reasons. Economics are supreme.
 
.
Here's a point which I think is crucial.

Figure out a way to make all these developments, that you require, to bring the manufacturer/researcher some economic benefit. Otherwise, only small and absolutely necessary funds go into R&D. Making projects financially viable usually means finding a viable civilian commercial use for the tech you develop. It is hard to keep on pumping money in the name of national interest with little or no monetary return. They've done this for the JF-17 by designing it from the onset to be exported. Ideally, whatever you develop should pay for itself. The American Military Industrial Complex is so advanced because it is profitable and not just because it needs to be for strategic reasons. Economics are supreme.

It is a chicken and egg problem. Pakistan's reputation in the world isn't at the point where we could invite others for partnership. We would need something like Bhutto's genius to convince leaders of wealthy nations to pay for our project. Unfortunately, Bhutto is long dead and there are no geniuses in Pakistan government. We need to bite the bullet and acquire the capabilities. Once the capabilities are there, they can flow into the private sector as well, in the form of a spin-off from PAC.

The problem with the private sector is that due to frequent energy crisis and law and order situation, no international company would want to invest privately in something as sensitive as fighter jet design and development. Whereas, the wealthy Pakistani industrialists are the likes of Nawaz Sharif, Zardari etc. I remember reading somewhere that Honda offered partnership. But here is the thing. I am unwilling to trust a local subsidiary of a foreign company with sensitive parts of our front line fighter jet. The enemy attacks the weakest link first, and a civilian business providing sensitive technology would attract attacks by enemies like bees to honey.
 
.
Considering a medium weight, hi tech fighter, in Sukhoi series, if SU-27 variants and upgrades like J-11, J-16, SU-35(duplicity with SU-30) is not an option then SU-34 can be looked at, considering European tech like EF is sanction prone. Otherwise jump on 5th gen, J-31/ TFX.
 
.
Considering a medium weight, hi tech fighter, in Sukhoi series, if SU-27 variants and upgrades like J-11, J-16, SU-35(duplicity with SU-30) is not an option then SU-34 can be looked at, considering European tech like EF is sanction prone. Otherwise jump on 5th gen, J-31/ TFX.

If we want Pakistan to truly gain indigenous capabilities, we will have to stop relying on off-the-shelf solutions and learn to make things ourselves. Do note I am not against procurement of a fifth gen fighter. But at the same time, I want us to nurture our own capabilities as well.
 
. .
Only way any industry survives is by employing professionals and like many experiences we should learn that Govt or organizations cannot run manufacturing units with efficiencies . I propose the way forward is to launch a corporation with 51-49 share percentage between private vendor and PAF . PAF being a sleeping partner in development but organization follows global trends and understand the needs of PAF
 
.
Only way any industry survives is by employing professionals and like many experiences we should learn that Govt or organizations cannot run manufacturing units with efficiencies . I propose the way forward is to launch a corporation with 51-49 share percentage between private vendor and PAF . PAF being a sleeping partner in development but organization follows global trends and understand the needs of PAF

PAF's active involvement is necessary for one big reason: security. PAF has operationalized a security paradigm which civilian organizations cannot replicate. Other than that, where would a private organization hire the necessary talent from? PAF has the wherewithal to train people from scratch, or to source talent internationally. Given the existing knowledge and talent pool in PAF, I am in favor of PAF nurturing organization, and once they are up and running, spin them off into private concerns who look after their own financial well-being, with projects guaranteed from a bunch of government entities. It can then start finding customers internationally as well.
 
.
I
PAF's active involvement is necessary for one big reason: security. PAF has operationalized a security paradigm which civilian organizations cannot replicate. Other than that, where would a private organization hire the necessary talent from? PAF has the wherewithal to train people from scratch, or to source talent internationally. Given the existing knowledge and talent pool in PAF, I am in favor of PAF nurturing organization, and once they are up and running, spin them off into private concerns who look after their own financial well-being, with projects guaranteed from a bunch of government entities. It can then start finding customers internationally as well.
I beg to differ as no Air Force in the world do the business parallel with other Govt ,its the role of Pvt companies ,AF role is define the requirement and needs and let the local partner do the job ,this creates a conflict of interest or in our corporate terms venturing into non core business .PAF first and only priority is to fight and make the skies safer
 
.
I

I beg to differ as no Air Force in the world do the business parallel with other Govt ,its the role of Pvt companies ,AF role is define the requirement and needs and let the local partner do the job ,this creates a conflict of interest or in our corporate terms venturing into non core business .PAF first and only priority is to fight and make the skies safer

Well, technically it's the PAC. Anyway, you need to first show me a private sector conglomerate that can be entrusted with national security otherwise the discussion is moot.
 
.
Thankyou. PAF deserves credit. Aeroeng turbines are central to aviation industry. It will be difficult for PAF to design or develop an airworthy turbine on its own. State engineering corporation like AVIC are needed. Out political govt. has to take initiative, it is their responsibility.
 
Last edited:
.
Well, technically it's the PAC. Anyway, you need to first show me a private sector conglomerate that can be entrusted with national security otherwise the discussion is moot.
National security is a paradigm which can be incorporated into Companies Vision and Mission statements ,for exports related matters all sales should be subjected to foreign policies .For professional run companies there are many in Pakistan e.g Engro Corporation is one fine organization
 
.
Why should we consider aviation industry limited to air frame & engine only? Aviation is a big field. IMHO, aircraft & helicopter manufacture is a game of numbers else per unit costs become too onerous. If it was up to me, I would limit the aircraft & engine sector to acquiring full maintenance & overhaul expertise and perhaps manufacture of some spare parts.

Why not concentrate on Avionics instead? Avionic systems which include radar, communications, navigation, the display and management of multiple systems, can significantly improve an aircraft’s performance. Research & development in other avenues such as missiles, bombs and ammunition technology can also be extremely beneficial.
 
Last edited:
.
Why should we consider aviation industry limited to air frame & engine only? Aviation is a big field. IMHO, aircraft & helicopter manufacture is a game of numbers else per unit costs become too onerous. If it was up to me, I would limit the aircraft & engine sector to acquiring full maintenance & overhaul expertise and perhaps manufacture of some spare parts.

Why not concentrate on Avionics instead? Avionic systems which include radar, communications, navigation, the display and management of multiple systems, can significantly improve an aircraft’s performance. Research & development in other avenues such as missiles, bombs and ammunition technology can also be extremely beneficial.

Thanks, I was planning to write about missile systems. I understand the need and the disproportionate returns from top notch Avionics/EW/Armaments. But in the end, if that were truly the case, the PAF wouldn't invest in JF-17s. There are any number of old Mig-21s, F-7s, Mirages what nots available on the market. Why not buy them and arm them with the latest and greatest technology?

The answer is, in today's world, characteristics such as low observability and reduced heat signature through composite usage are going to become equally crucial. We need to think in terms of the professionals who will be fighting the wars. Ask the pilots what they need to fulfil their jobs? Is it just great missiles? Only EW? A pilot whose life is on the line would put manoeuvrability and agility at the top of the list.

By the way, my proposal for air frame and engine was based on an as needed basis. I would dearly love to see commercial jet liners, helicopters, radars, communication equipment produced in Pakistan. But the article is more geared towards what the AvDI should do in the short term.

EDIT: Oh, and of course, the whole point being advancing Pakistan's indigenous capabilities in the hi-tech arena of aircraft design and development. It is the obvious next step after JF-17. Let's not repeat the mistake of K-8 where we initially acquired production capability and then did nothing to enhance our knowledge, understanding, and potential.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom