Those who mock assembly keep on coming back to it: Khawaja Asif

[Jinn Baba]

He can show his bank account and source of income. Hence proving that he is not corrupt.

Unfortunately same cannot be said for Mian Saanp

Gali gali mein shor hai
Nawaz Sharif chor hai



Nooron mein hal chal mach gayi hai


Angrezi mein jaisay kehtay hain "putting the cat amongst the pigeons"

I accuse you of being a paid PTI poster, I'm sure you took several crore rupees from IK for making anti-PML-N posts!

Now put your bank statements and assets on PDF and prove me wrong. Otherwise, you're really just as corrupt as IK who embezelled billions of rupees from KPK budget and PTI party funds.

 

[xyxmt]

You don't say it lawmaker, your PM lies through his teeth in this very so-called supreme institution.

then why is Imran coming back, he said he will not accept NS as his PM, so what changed? is he convinced by PM's defense? Either that or Imran is dhokey baaz again.

 

[Syed1.]

I accuse you of being a paid PTI poster, I'm sure you took several crore rupees from IK for making anti-PML-N posts!

Now put your bank statements and assets on PDF and prove me wrong. Otherwise, you're really just as corrupt as IK who embezelled billions of rupees from KPK budget and PTI party funds.

Sorry your opinion or accusations do not matter. File a petition in SC then we will talk.

 

[Jinn Baba]

Sorry your opinion or accusations do not matter. File a petition in SC then we will talk.

What would going to the SC prove when i have no evidence? Let's say I do go to court and my case flops (because all I have are accusations and no proof), by your own logic are you still not guilty because you wouldn't show me your bank statements?

 

[Arbiter]

What would going to the SC prove when i have no evidence? Let's say I do go to court and my case flops (because all I have are accusations and no proof), by your own logic are you still not guilty because you wouldn't show me your bank statements?

Even after all this some people still don't get it. If the accused denies an allegation then the burden of proof is on the declarent. If the accused admits then the burden of proof is on the accused. Case in point, the burden of proof is not on PTI but NS and his family who has admitted ownership of the flat. It is up to them to prove that the property is bought with legal money through legal transition. If NS and his family had denied the ownership then the burden of proof would be on PTI.

 

[Syed1.]

What would going to the SC prove when i have no evidence? Let's say I do go to court and my case flops (because all I have are accusations and no proof), by your own logic are you still not guilty because you wouldn't show me your bank statements?

No if I don't show bank statements than whatever you have put in your petition will be accepted as true by any independent court.

However if the court is in my pocket then they can let me off the hook.

 

[Jzaib]

you were wrong once for supporting PTI, you are wrong again thinking i dont support PMLN anymore

I see your replies on various threat . I felt after panama issue you felt ashmed and now I felt you are posting less frequently

 

[xyxmt]

I see your replies on various threat . I felt after panama issue you felt ashmed and now I felt you are posting less frequently

Panama issue is useless fake issues, its a non-issue and its being used by our enemy country to create political unstability in Pakistan, and who better to use than a naive politician. Create political unrest, close Islamabad, create uncertainty, stop CPEC.

 

[s.k]

Forum pe PTI suppoters bhar gaye hayn Noonis Poonis k suppoters ki din ba din halat khasta hotay ja rahay hayn.

 

[TheNoob]

I'm no fan of either party.
but what this guy just said
i mean, hes kinda right....

 

[Jzaib]

Panama issue is useless fake issues, its a non-issue and its being used by our enemy country to create political unstability in Pakistan, and who better to use than a naive politician. Create political unrest, close Islamabad, create uncertainty, stop CPEC.

Lol . seriously ?

 

[xyxmt]

Lol . seriously ?

from you reply I get that you know its to be true, just cant admit you were wrong about Imran. I was too, I was the first few who started supporting him and even was a paying member of PTI for two years, then Imran opened my eyes that he is dumber than a mochi, very light on this ears, does not have a firm stand on anything but whatever last person whispered in his ears. So, Imran is out the next best thing is/was NS

 

[SBD-3]

TBH, people won't like it. but the most parliamentary party so has only been the PPP. Their other problems aside, they have always shown the highest resolve for upholding the status of parliament than any other political party in this country.

PML-N, for the statement submitted by the lawyer of PM calling his speech as political statement is a serious breach of Parliament's sacredness for which he needs to be held accountable either through the current SCP or by the parliament if the case is dropped by SCP.

PTI, well, they are not a parliamentary party in any sense. After receiving their paychecks, they will go out and start barking on the assembly again until the next paycheck becomes due.

 

[Jzaib]

from you reply I get that you know its to be true, just cant admit you were wrong about Imran. I was too, I was the first few who started supporting him and even was a paying member of PTI for two years, then Imran opened my eyes that he is dumber than a mochi, very light on this ears, does not have a firm stand on anything but whatever last person whispered in his ears. So, Imran is out the next best thing is/was NS

Na i have met him too many times . i know his flaws . But despite few flaws he is the only hope i see for Pakistan .

 

[Finer]

Didn't PM lawyer said his address was political in NA?


Ap ka intizar ha . you use to defend any thing Sharif family do, now u at least try to say away from supporting them . Tabdeeli

There is no such thing as political when it comes to the court. A court is diversified that takes all form of narrative into the account.

P.S: The stability of democracy is the way to conform changes in time [not overnight] - not anarchism.

He can show his bank account and source of income. Hence proving that he is not corrupt.


Angrezi mein jaisay kehtay hain "putting the cat amongst the pigeons"

What about his oversea account that he didn't register in the court? Then he says, "I don't have such account", and then i say, 'he is lying'. He has invisible overseas account and ask him to prove his invisible 'overseas' account.