What's new

Those asking for proof of surgical strikes not loyal to country: Manohar Parrikar

The point is those asking for proofs are playing cheap politics and are worried over the prospects that bjp might take advantage of it in UP elections next year and to brand them as anti national is also another point of extreme cheap politics. Opposition is more at fault though making politics of an national security issue

:) well BJP lives on anti-Pak vote??? it means.

Anyway using the yardstick you have mentioned Congress can safely say as well that all this sourgical strike drama was played to take advantage in UP elections .

Asking for proofs is not a sin
 
Speak of villagers, this what CNN observed.




Hussain Haqqani is a Pakistani but we cannot denounce and you know, unfortunately, we have to live with such people though HH forgot the identity that Pakistan gave him but still never miss a chance to malign and defame just to serve the masters.

Arre nahin, Sir-jee.

  1. @Spring Onion was pulling Syed Sahib's leg.
  2. The reference to Haqqanis was not connected to Hussain Haqqani, but to the terrorists called the Haqqani Group.
 
exactly if they think surgical strikes have not happened then let it be so, wats the problem there? Given the threat still exists no one is going to give out info on how it is done. Infact it was pretty stupid of govt to go about tom-toming it. Professionals let the work speak for themselves instead of their potty mouths.

Dude why are you trying so hard to convince us? If it did happen then everyone will acknowledge it around the world. Convince your own home crowd first would be a good example. o_O
 
That is the type of stand typically taken by dictatorship to hide their lie and propaganda. india has became exactly that - world biggest dictatorship of hindu fundamentalist.
 
So Mr parrikar if we make same claims of Pak did 10 surgical strikes in Mumbai your answer be similar that proof is not needed Pak is saying so they did it
 
Hang the lot!

But Sir, speaking the truth, and standing for what is right is not treason. Or is it? The favorite tactic of such fools is to accuse those speaking the truth of defamation and malignment, when it is nothing of the sort.
 
Arre nahin, Sir-jee.

  1. @Spring Onion was pulling Syed Sahib's leg.
  2. The reference to Haqqanis was not connected to Hussain Haqqani, but to the terrorists called the Haqqani Group.

Sir Ji, I was merely referring to traitor Hussain Haqqani, ex ambassador of Pakistan in US, the ungrateful that never miss a chance to defame the country that raised him, give him respect and identity yet bites back like a snake, not the Haqqani group. On lighter side for @Spring Onion reply.

Hahahahahahh.... Seems like things got mixed up in heat of debate due to similarity of Name Haqani.
 
This makes no sense. Aren't Indians always the ones claiming they always accuse based on evidence, and that accusations against India without evidence are conspiracy theories?
 
Atleast show the video to your own people for satisfaction
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom