There is no unity among people in Pakistan.

[SrNair]

who told you that? you seen it yourself? or heard from someone? I doubt even a hardcore Hindu would do such a thing.
post proof with such claims

Perhaps some old folk songs. For peoples like her that is an enough proof to make allegations

 

[haviZsultan]

Proof tau nai hai ,and it was pre partition, how i could have seen that? Heard from someone ,and i trust his words. It was an incident at a single hindu restaurant , but this thing was happening at few other restaurants in different towns too. But i knew i dont have proof and it wouldnt be taken seriously, (and also as i have seen indians refusing to accept their faults in gujjrat massacre, so this incident is nothing) So because of it iadded Dogra rule here, because it was a thru and thru hindu raj with hindu laws in place ...and what was hapening under that rule is well a documented and known fact.

Its ok if u dont believe me ,its my shortcoming that ihave no proof to back the restaurant claim. (But aisa tha).

Shamain is right. When Hindutvas don't sell us properties:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/62e72d98-39a3-11e4-93da-00144feabdc0.html

Why Muslims should not be allowed to purchase new flats, lands etc. in non-Muslim areas? | Struggle for Hindu Existence

Then they can clearly close restaurants for muslims.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

There were hindu restaurants with boards mounted outside , muslims and dogs arent allowed. Lets speak of j and k state. How hindu dogras had treated and oppressed muslims' of that region?

who told you that? you seen it yourself? or heard from someone? I doubt even a hardcore Hindu would do such a thing.
post proof with such claims

Shamain is right. When Hindutvas don't sell us properties:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/62e72d98-39a3-11e4-93da-00144feabdc0.html

Why Muslims should not be allowed to purchase new flats, lands etc. in non-Muslim areas? | Struggle for Hindu Existence

Then they can clearly close restaurants for muslims.

totally different issue. although still wrong but the alleged sign of dogs and muslims is pushing it too much. Indian Muslims are part of India such attitude wont escape political upheaval and media reporting. we should be careful when we level allegations because it makes our own case weak.

 

[Shamain]

who told you that? you seen it yourself? or heard from someone? I doubt even a hardcore Hindu would do such a thing.
post proof with such claims

totally different issue. although still wrong but the alleged sign of dogs and muslims is pushing it too much. Indian Muslims are part of India such attitude wont escape political upheaval and media reporting. we should be careful when we level allegations because it makes our own case weak.

Sir may nay pre partition kaha hai and isaid i didnt have proof so thats ihad added dogra rule which is a known thing, and what dogras had done before taht dog signboards are nothing.
Secondly, u said koi hardcore hindu nahi aisa karay ga...then have u read the details of gujrat massacre and kausa bano? Who were those people?? Common hindus.

 

[Sine Nomine]

There were no examples, only generic statements that the Dogras were oppressive. ?

In 1837, Raja Gulab Singh of Jammu was entrusted by Maharaja Ranjit Singh to suppress the revolt of the Yousafzai tribe which formed the biggest proportion of Pashtun tribes. He offered one rupee for the head of every Yousafzai man brought to his feet. He made Katuha his headquarters and hunted for Muslim Pashtun tribes. He had some of the women spared, but others were kept for Raja Gulab Singh's harem and the rest were sold as slaves in Lahore and Jammu. It was reported that this expedition resulted in the loss of tens of thousands of Pashtun rebels and thousands of women were sold into slavery.
Marriage Among Muslims: Preference and Choice in Northern Pakistan - Hastings Donnan - Google Books
After acquiring Jammu and Kashmir through the Treaty of Kashmir, Dogra rulers continued the anti-Muslim policies of their Sikh allies. The worst atrocities perpetrated against Muslims in the state came in 1863 when the Dogra ruler Maharaja Ranbir Singh ordered a major invasion of the frontier areas of Yasin and Hunza to punish Muslim rebels. 3,000 troops were commanded by General Hooshiara Singh who invaded the frontier. The Dogras took all men as prisoners and many Dogra soldiers entered the back portion of the Mandoori Hill which was full of Yasini and Hunza women and their children. Those women who were injured but not dead were burnt alive and approximately 2000 Yasin villagers were killed overall. About 5,000 Yasinis were taken back to Srinagar for forced labor and all their women were included into the harems of Dogra Soldiers.
Gilgit Agency 1877-1935Second Reprint - Amar Singh Chohan - Google Books
@WAJsal

 

[Kao Boy]

Pakistan is more united than any country; nobody considers them self "pathan", "punjabi", "balochi" and ect... just look at the elections; only 0.1% of the people voted for ethnic nationalist partys.

I think u have been sleeping since ages...

 

[Peter Griffin]

who told you that? you seen it yourself? or heard from someone? I doubt even a hardcore Hindu would do such a thing.
post proof with such claims

It's all lie.That time Indians were so busy fighting British, these stupid things would never have occurred their minds. Just some conspiracy theory to justify partition based on religion.

On topic: Pakistan=Not India. that's it that is the identity, and that's what Pakistanis try to prove every now and then.

 

[nForce]

Proof tau nai hai ,and it was pre partition, how i could have seen that? Heard from someone ,and i trust his words. It was an incident at a single hindu restaurant , but this thing was happening at few other restaurants in different towns too. But i knew i dont have proof and it wouldnt be taken seriously, (and also as i have seen indians refusing to accept their faults in gujjrat massacre, so this incident is nothing) So because of it iadded Dogra rule here, because it was a thru and thru hindu raj with hindu laws in place ...and what was hapening under that rule is well a documented and known fact.

Its ok if u dont believe me ,its my shortcoming that ihave no proof to back the restaurant claim. (But aisa tha).

Who ever told you that, copied the story of Pritilata Waddedar , a Bengali revolutionary, and replaced the word "Indians" with "Muslims". Really pathetic case of distortion of history.

Pritilata Waddedar, belonging to a group of revolutionaries led by Masterda Surya Sen had attacked the Pahartali European club which had a signboard, "Dogs and Indians not allowed", with the aim to torch it down, in protest against the insult to the Indians. She was injured in the process and committed suicide by consuming cyanide.
This happened in 1932.
Someone fed you the wrong story and you readily believed it. Or even more likely that you invented the story yourself.

@Irfan Baloch @Joe Shearer

 

[Kao Boy]

Who ever told you that, copied the story of Pritilata Waddedar , a Bengali revolutionary, and replaced the word "Indians" with "Muslims". Really pathetic case of distortion of history.

Pritilata Waddedar, belonging to a group of revolutionaries led by Masterda Surya Sen had attacked the Pahartali European club which had a signboard, "Dogs and Indians not allowed", with the aim to torch it down, in protest against the insult to the Indians. She was injured in the process and committed suicide by consuming cyanide.
This happened in 1932.
Someone fed you the wrong story and you readily believed it.

@Irfan Baloch @Joe Shearer

During the conversation... I was trying to figure out where I have this sort of anecdote... But could not recalls anyways...shall we stick to the Unity thing...

 

[Joe Shearer]

Who ever told you that, copied the story of Pritilata Waddedar , a Bengali revolutionary, and replaced the word "Indians" with "Muslims". Really pathetic case of distortion of history.

Pritilata Waddedar, belonging to a group of revolutionaries led by Masterda Surya Sen had attacked the Pahartali European club which had a signboard, "Dogs and Indians not allowed", with the aim to torch it down, in protest against the insult to the Indians. She was injured in the process and committed suicide by consuming cyanide.
This happened in 1932.
Someone fed you the wrong story and you readily believed it. Or even more likely that you invented the story yourself.

@Irfan Baloch @Joe Shearer

A well-known story, part of the Chittagong Armoury Raid incident.

 

[nForce]

A well-known story, part of the Chittagong Armoury Raid incident.

Apparently, not so well known to some of our Western neighbours. Shocking, the way they have modified it.

BTW.
@Joe Shearer Chittagong Armoury raid happened in 1930, and this incident happened in 1932. What is the connection between the two ? Anything else, apart from the fact the Surya Sen was involved in both the cases ? Why do you call it a part of the Armoury incident ?

 

[Spectre]

A well-known story, part of the Chittagong Armoury Raid incident.

Just a small correction - Not a story an incident which is at par with Rosa Parks.

 

[Shamain]

Who ever told you that, copied the story of Pritilata Waddedar , a Bengali revolutionary, and replaced the word "Indians" with "Muslims". Really pathetic case of distortion of history.

Pritilata Waddedar, belonging to a group of revolutionaries led by Masterda Surya Sen had attacked the Pahartali European club which had a signboard, "Dogs and Indians not allowed", with the aim to torch it down, in protest against the insult to the Indians. She was injured in the process and committed suicide by consuming cyanide.
This happened in 1932.
Someone fed you the wrong story and you readily believed it. Or even more likely that you invented the story yourself.

@Irfan Baloch @Joe Shearer

For god'ssake it wasnt this.
@Irfan Baloch u can believe his nonsense but its not from here, and i specifically said it was 'muslims and dogs not allowed'. Rest as i said everyone is free to believe it or not , iwont add more on this.

 

[nForce]

For god sake it wasnt this.
@Irfan Baloch u can believe his nonsense but its not from here, and i specifically said it was 'muslims and dogs not allowed'. Rest as i said anyone is free to believe or ot believe, iwont add more on this.

Yes, as I said, seems like someone picked up this story and changed the word "Indians" with "Muslims", most likely, you yourself.

This incident, should be a part of your history text book. It is an important chapter of Indian freedom struggle and Chittagong was after all in East Pakistan or present day Bangladesh.

 

[Shamain]

Yes, as I said, seems like someone picked up this story and changed the word "Indians" with "Muslims", most likely, you yourself.

This incident, should be a part of your history text book. It is an important chapter of Indian freedom struggle and Chittagong was after all in East Pakistan or present day Bangladesh.

I have spoken out clearly what iwas talking abt and it has nothing to do with this incident. And there were several eateries with no muslims and dogs boards.Now troll on, iwont reply back to your nonsense.