What's new

The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything

Why you pointing at yourself and giggling :o:
Take that right from her too.

Ranjeetey man ja guru.
image.jpg
 
. . . . .
Gimme a Break man! 99 percent of the British Pakistani girls I met have got psychological issues Narcissistic personality disorder,Too many mood swings,grandiosity.The worst of all is their disdain for Pakistanis and love for white skin. On topic: I would label Krista as nefarious not mentally ill.

Are you sure you're not talking about 99% of humans? Because that's how I've found the majority of people to be. You don't have to be diagnosed with a mental disorder to have something wrong with you.
 
. .
Lolzz he's jealous of you. :lol:

Yes of course, I am jealous of something I have no idea of what it is. :lol:
Or I am jealous for seeing women who they are whilst most men would live in a fairy land about women and their nature :lol:

Nope men too 've a herd mentality.

No they do not.

Its not about "NOT wanting to do physical jobs", women 're naturally less stronger than men and ergo CAN NOT do labour intensive jobs.
And if turning men into slaves was so easy then women would've done that eons ago.

Women are smarter than this. They will make men think they are acting on their own when in fact they are acting under a social order primarily created by the female collective. And so they turn men into their slaves by shaming them and creating societal structures where its optional for women to work but mandatory for men to work. Of course if women keep a job they keep the money they earn for themselves, while the money men make is what is used to run the household. In a world where 90% of the population is female, the females would easily turn all men into slaves by forcing them into labour.

Women are the most privileged class that has ever existed throughout history. They've had men do their dirty work. They created social orders whereby they preyed upon most men's need for female validation in order to shame them into doing what they want. They've attacked men's manhood to control them as well.

When men created an environment were women could work in a safe environment, free from nature's elements or from requiring physical strength, instead of appreciating men they come up with concocted nonsense such as "oppression in workforce" and "patriarchy" and basically spit in men's face. However, all along the history they had never wanted to work in the workforce anyway because they didn't have the physical strength and/or wanted protection from nature and vast majority of available jobs involved those factors.

Raping men?? :blink: :blink:
Not possible....proven scientifically.

That's complete and utter BS. I am guessing some 2 rate scientists produced this study. And their evidence would be that if male cannot get an erection then rape is impossible and that if male does get erection it means it's not rape. Which is complete and utter BS, because an erection can be an involuntary physical response. Women that have been raped sometimes have had orgasms during the rape and their vagina gets lubricated. I guess that means they weren't raped. You're a prime example of a woman propagating double standards that benefit women. Nearly 100% of women propagate this BS.

Right!
A woman looks for a man who is a good provider but if a man really loves her, she would accept him for what he is.

AHAHAHAHAHA
LOLOLOLOL

That's exactly why women put so many men that claim they love them in friend zones or ignore them all together. Right, this is why I never care what women say in what they want in a man, or care for relationship/gender advice from them to begin with.

The least that he should be, is to be a good provider. But women unlike men dont believe in violence and ergo killing is the last thing women would resort to.

25%+ of all serious violence is now perpetrated by women in western nations and it is only going up. Yes, a man should be a good provider, i.e. be your resource slave that goes unappreciated. And your "full time job" of raising a kid, which involves watching soap operas, movies and tv shows must be appreciated. Men need to start understanding that women never love men for who they are, and instead see them as utility tools to get things done or to provide resources.

Women dont like men who can not make up their mind and who 're scared to commit, because that gives the feeling of "being used" by the man and that infuriates her.

I am talking plainly about men that refuse to marry. The society as a whole, in particular women, try to shame the man into finding a woman and getting shacked up so he can be her resource slave. This is what's starting to happen with me now.

Women hate wars, violence and anything that's destructive, the reason for this should be that after bearing a child nature surfeits her with love.

Do Indira Gandhi, Margaret Thatcher, Hillary Clinton, Benazir Bhutto, Tzipi Livni ring a bell? All these women either started wars, or lead the support for those wars or leading their advocacy. These are female leaders from the last 40 odd years that were either head of states or held positions that were very high up in their respective.

Women like and elect female leaders that are aggressive in their nature, and with that come females that are very interested in wars and violence.

Oh sire!
Your theory is as illogical as the blonde femitheist who wrote this article.

This is female nature that I am talking about, that all women will refuse to acknowledge. They see men are resources slave and/or physical labour slaves that are necessary to keep this world running. They never appreciate the work done by these men, and instead "expect" it due to the goddesses that they are.
 
Last edited:
.
Men like women for who they are, whilst women like men for what they can provide them - i.e. resources and protection.

quite ruthless you are being, sir... what about when the ladies are being flirty for just the man i am ( or you are )... flirty not in a uncaring way ( which may suggest want for resources and protection ) but flirty in a more sensual way... let me not get too explicit here. ;)

but your explanation reminded of sheldon cooper from "the big bang theory". :D

Why do you think women get so pissed off when they find a guy isn't interested in marriage or relationships

because of social pressure and social conditioning... it is like peer pressure... many ladies put pressure on the man because they take it on themselves to make everything public and validate everything to the public.

Another possible fate is being forced into a war.

all the foolish wars are because of foolish people with nothing to do with male or female.

i will use mugwop's example of margaret thatcher or my example of angela merkel, and ask how are these two females any different from tony b'liar or narendra modi or erdogan or zia ul haq...

where's my sword?? :butcher:

come to socialism... freedoms await you... come... come... listen to this wise cat... come to socialism... come... come... :angel:

Nope men too 've a herd mentality.

exactly... why else would the world's western-style "professional colleges" ( especially in india ) be filled to the last bench by so many idiotic males... why else would the typical modern male be so fascinated by... yuck... job employment !!!
 
.
quite ruthless you are being, sir... what about when the ladies are being flirty for just the man i am ( or you are )... flirty not in a uncaring way ( which may suggest want for resources and protection ) but flirty in a more sensual way... let me not get too explicit here. ;)

but your explanation reminded of sheldon cooper from "the big bang theory". :D

Because women do that with a different end-goal than men, except when women just want a one-night stand.. besides that case, they always have a different end-goal in mind. That end-goal involves getting a resource provider and a protector, while they sit at home and do their "full time job" involving watching soap operas, movies, etc, or they do an actual job but keep all the money they earn for themselves.

Here's a video that's really worth watching..


Women are like over-grown children, they want all the privileges they can get, and will stop at nothing to get those privileges even if they are anti-male, but they want none of the responsibilities.

because of social pressure and social conditioning... it is like peer pressure... many ladies put pressure on the man because they take it on themselves to make everything public and validate everything to the public.

I am not sure I get your argument. Men don't put anywhere near as much pressure on anyone to get married as women. And women will use shaming language to try and manipulate men into becoming a resource slave for a woman, whereas men will use logic and constructive argumentation, albeit that those arguments have holes to begin with anyway.

Not sure anyone read this excerpt from the OP, but I predicted this already..

Like slaves?
Not as slaves, simply as workers performing a duty, in the same way workers today do. Only without the need for monetary reimbursement as they would have no need for such a thing. This would be highly monitored and regulated.

So, essentially slaves - not paid, highly monitored and regulated. And the horny men on the thread were thinking they'd be getting tail every day and be worshiped if only 10% of the population was male.
 
Last edited:
.
Yes of course, I am jealous of something I have no idea of what it is. :lol:
Or I am jealous for seeing women who they are whilst most men would live in a fairy land about women and their nature :lol:



No they do not.



Women are smarter than this. They will make men think they are acting on their own when in fact they are acting under a social order primarily created by the female collective. And so they turn men into their slaves by shaming them and creating societal structures where its optional for women to work but mandatory for men to work. Of course if women keep a job they keep the money they earn for themselves, while the money men make is what is used to run the household. In a world where 90% of the population is female, the females would easily turn all men into slaves by forcing them into labour.

Women are the most privileged class that has ever existed throughout history. They've had men do their dirty work. They created social orders whereby they preyed upon most men's need for female validation in order to shame them into doing what they want. They've attacked men's manhood to control them as well.

When men created an environment were women could work in a safe environment, free from nature's elements or from requiring physical strength, instead of appreciating men they come up with concocted nonsense such as "oppression in workforce" and "patriarchy" and basically spit in men's face. However, all along the history they had never wanted to work in the workforce anyway because they didn't have the physical strength and/or wanted protection from nature and vast majority of available jobs involved those factors.



That's complete and utter BS. I am guessing some 2 rate scientists produced this study. And their evidence would be that if male cannot get an erection then rape is impossible and that if male does get erection it means it's not rape. Which is complete and utter BS, because an erection can be an involuntary physical response. Women that have been raped sometimes have had orgasms during the rape and their vagina gets lubricated. I guess that means they weren't raped. You're a prime example of a woman propagating double standards that benefit women. Nearly 100% of women propagate this BS.



AHAHAHAHAHA
LOLOLOLOL

That's exactly why women put so many men that claim they love them in friend zones or ignore them all together. Right, this is why I never care what women say in what they want in a man, or care for relationship/gender advice from them to begin with.



25%+ of all serious violence is now perpetrated by women in western nations and it is only going up. Yes, a man should be a good provider, i.e. be your resource slave that goes unappreciated. And your "full time job" of raising a kid, which involves watching soap operas, movies and tv shows must be appreciated. Men need to start understanding that women never love men for who they are, and instead see them as utility tools to get things done or to provide resources.



I am talking plainly about men that refuse to marry. The society as a whole, in particular women, try to shame the man into finding a woman and getting shacked up so he can be her resource slave.



Do Indira Gandhi, Margaret Thatcher, Hillary Clinton, Benazir Bhutto, Tzipi Livni ring a bell? All these women either started wars, or lead the support for those wars or leading their advocacy. These are female leaders from the last 40 odd years that were either head of states or held positions that were very high up in their respective.

Women like and elect female leaders that are aggressive in their nature, and with that come females that are very interested in wars and violence.



This is female nature that I am talking about, that all women will refuse to acknowledge. They see men are resources slave and/or physical labour slaves that are necessary to keep this world running. They never appreciate the work done by these men, and instead "expect" it due to the goddesses that they are.

The kinda women you're talking about dont even make 30% of the total population(females). And there're always exceptions in nature.
But you can NOT pull such sweeping statements just because you had a bad experience...most prolly thats the case.
SMC said:
This is what's starting to happen with me now.
 
.
The kinda women you're talking about don't make 30% of the total population(females). And there're always exceptions in nature.
But you can NOT pull such sweeping statements just because you had a bad experience...most prolly thats the case.

You mean they make 70% of the female population :o:. I knew it!! , Bahar sai safed , andar sai kala !!!
 
. . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom