The widening gap between Indian and Chinese air power

[ashok321]

The fact being that India is still not decided when and how to have 5th Gen fighter, while China is flying them speaks a lot about this crucial gap.

 

[Panzerfaust 3]

The fact being that India is still not decided when and how to have 5th Gen fighter, while China is flying them speaks a lot about this crucial gap.

We have decided it's going to be SU 57 no doubt,but the cost overrun and excuses of tech transfer ,the Russians needed to be taught a lesson
That's why we saw the developments about f 35

 

[ashok321]

MTCR guidelines never stopped us from acquiring Brahmos missile ,its true range was kept a secret it is actually about 800 km
Now we are a member ,and you will see they will reveal it someday

Brahmos started with a MTCR compliant range of 290 KM.

MTCR benefit: India, Russia to develop 600-km range cruise missiles ...

 

[Reichsmarschall]

PLAAF is miles more powerful.

Bullshit
Chinki Airforce is by no mean comparable to Mighty Vedic Airforce Which have 6th and 7th Gen Aircrafts

 

[ashok321]

We have decided it's going to be SU 57 no doubt,but the cost overrun and excuses of tech transfer ,the Russians needed to be taught a lesson
That's why we saw the developments about f 35

So you want to teach a lesson to a country that leases you nuclear submarine? The country that gave you full consultancy to make INS Arihant at home?

This is the reason I avoid engaging loudmouth Modians.

Don't respond me.

 

[Panzerfaust 3]

Brahmos started with a MTCR compliant range of 290 KM.

MTCR benefit: India, Russia to develop 600-km range cruise missiles ...

I know but just after India's entry into the MTCR things suddenly changed ,Brahmos's 290 km range became 650
I bet it already had this range

 

[Mace]

Bullshit
Chinki Airforce is by no mean comparable to Mighty Vedic Airforce Which have 6th and 7th Gen Aircrafts
View attachment 470924

Having shiny toys is one thing but you have to back it with bal!s. I will not be astonished PAF taking on IAF even if it had only F7s. PLAAF not so much.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Having shiny toys is one thing but you have to back it with bal!s. I will not be astonished PAF taking on IAF even if it had only F7s. PLAAF not so much.

we cant take on IAF which has 6th and 7th Gen A/C as said by ex IAF pilot @randomradio

 

[Panzerfaust 3]

So you want to teach a lesson to a country that leases you nuclear submarine? The country that gave you full consultancy to make INS Arihant at home?

This is the reason I avoid engaging loudmouth Modians.

Don't respond me.

You sound too emotional about it
There are no friends just national interests ,and we don't tolerate cost overruns and an attempt to milk us
Taking me for a Modian already?

 

[Mace]

we cant take on IAF which has 6th and 7th Gen A/C as said by ex IAF pilot @randomradio

He is not wrong. In a conventional fight IAF will come on top.

My point is, that is not going to stop PAF from throwing everything at IAF. In comparison PLAAF are posturing queens.

 

[randomradio]

Do you you have a source for that? That the IAF has been using it for some time? As far as I'm aware, it has not been inducted into the IAF yet.

The K-100 entered production years ago. It has been advertised for export also.

The IAF has decided not to make the news public about the exact dates and numbers.