What's new

the truth about Low Oil Prices, Russia is less effected than Saudi Arabia & OPEC

senheiser

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
4,037
Reaction score
-1
Country
Russian Federation
Location
Germany
http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/20...rs-risk-ratings-downgrade-on-low-crude-price/
James Kynge | Nov 25 12:12

Bahrain, Angola, Ecuador and Venezuela rank as the emerging markets (EM) most vulnerable to a downgrade in their sovereign credit ratings if oil prices do not recover in 2015, Fitch Ratings said in a report published on Tuesday.

With benchmark Brent crude prices close to $80 a barrel, down from $115 a barrel in mid-June, the revenues of all oil producers are under pressure. But due to differing levels of fiscal reliance on oil income, the speed of deterioration in domestic budgetary conditions varies sharply among EM producers.

The blue bars in the chart below estimate the oil price at which each country manages to balance government revenues with spending, known as the fiscal breakeven point. The red squares on the chart plot the estimated 2014 budget surplus or deficit in each country, expressed as a percentage of GDP.

fitch-report-on-oil-vulnerabilities-e1416912571304[1].png

Source: Fitch Ratings

Thus, as the chart shows, Kuwait, with a budget surplus close to 25 per cent of GDP and a fiscal breakeven point of around $50 a barrel, is the most resilient to continued weakness in oil prices, according to Fitch.

Other territories such as Abu Dhabi and Norway, which like Kuwait produce a lot of oil per capita and therefore have to devote less of their oil revenues to meeting their people’s needs, also enjoy considerable resilience to oil price declines. They have built up big budgetary buffers in recent years, reinforcing their position of strength.

At the other end of the spectrum, Bahrain’s repeated budget deficits since 2009 has more than doubled its debt to GDP ratio, meaning that a significant chunk of oil revenues is required just to pay off the interest on domestic debts. Ecuador is in a similar position, after its oil receipts fell by 2 percentage points of GDP last year and its central government deficit surged.

The other measure of vulnerability is the extent to which a country relies on oil for its fiscal revenues, with Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait, Congo and Angola leading the way (see blue bars in the chart below). The red bars show the proportion of the current account inflows that derive from oil. A low ratio denotes a greater potential for a country – such as Mexico – to rely on non-oil exports when the oil price slumps.

fitch-oil-revenues-e1416915132701[1].png

Source: Fitch Ratings

Venezuela appears vulnerable on all counts – it has a relatively high fiscal breakeven point (of around $110 per barrel of crude), runs a fiscal deficit equal to close to 5 per cent of GDP, relies on oil revenues for around 40 per cent of its fiscal revenues and depends on oil exports for close to 95 per cent of its current account receipts. Fitch currently gives Venezuela a sovereign rating of B, with a negative outlook.

Fitch acknowledges difficulties in estimating Venezuela’s fiscal breakeven point because it is not clear what exchange rate the government uses when converting oil-derived revenues, but a weighted average exchange rate using the economy’s three foreign exchange systems results in an estimated breakeven price of $107 a barrel.

Nigeria is victim of oil price slumpIn an example of how the oil price slide is having a market impact on the more vulnerable of countries, Nigeria has suffered a slump in the value of the naira against the US dollar in recent months, creating a policy dilemma for the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

The naira’s fall to NGN176 to the US dollar in mid-November, down from NGN162 to the US dollar in August, may not lead directly to an official devaluation by the central bank, says David Faulkner, economist at HSBC Securities in South Africa.

“Past episodes of currency stress suggest the Central Bank of Nigeria will try a combination of policies to stem depreciation and preclude devaluation of the official foreign exchange rate,” Faulkner said.

“Since late-October, the CBN has introduced several administrative measures, albeit with little impact, and we expect continued intervention through its $37.5bn in foreign exchange reserves to try to stabilise the currency. We also expect the CBN to tighten policy through a higher cash reserve requirement on private deposits and/ora 50 basis point rate hike at its meeting on November 25.”

===
funny how the FT doesnt mention Russia in any way because its less effected than all other Opec members the second chart shows and needs almost the same Oil price like saudi arabia, it doesnt fit in their propaganda scheme.
 
. . . .
This is obviously a closely calculated move whose ultimate consequences are yet to be known. I am not sure where I stand myself but that's not strange given the fact that I do not know about the calculations that have caused this policy etc. Despite that I do not believe that KSA would be willing to make such a "gamble" without reason.

All I know is that KSA has the most healthy account balance in the world and that it is the biggest surplus nation together with China. Not strange then that those two countries trade volume and relations on all fronts (nuclear energy, military, politics, economy etc.) are growing at a high rate each year. Moreover the Saudi Arabian economy is growing at a very fast rate contrary to most other economic powers. In fact if I am not wrong then we have been predicated to have the highest growth rate from 2015 until 2025 among all the G-20 Major Economies Member States.

People speak like there is no shale oil reserves in KSA. They are wrong. In fact KSA has one of the biggest reserves as well and most of the country is yet to be explored due to the high costs of such operations.

Anyway for each year the non-oil/gas/natural resources portion of the Saudi Arabian economy is growing at a very high level on a yearly basis (about 8% if I remember correctly) and there is no sign of that changing anytime soon rather the opposite according to all economic reports out there whether local or international.

In the future I am also very hopeful of the GCC or the Arabian Peninsula as a whole uniting into 1 country. This way the enormous natural riches of those countries will be centralized and belong to 1 federal state. Of course the West and everyone else (almost) is not interested in that but if certain things change there is little they can do. That's another discussion though.

Anyway regarding shale oil extraction. It's true that innovations in drilling and hydraulic technologies have opened new supplies of shale oil and gas for the US and other countries but there is good reason to believe that the "shale boom" may be overstated.

Firstly the processes are costly. Chemicals and water are pumped underground, requiring the disposal of millions of liters wastewater. The new wells have a shorter lifespan and the scale of additional investment required to keep the boom going appears unsustainable giving the absent technological breakthroughs as of now.
A secure market requires the right geology, government regulations, technical expertise and funding. Also without further technological development, the shale oil revolution could be a passing trend that simply delays the search and development of alternative fuels that stem climate change.

Has Saudi Arabia declared "Oil Price War"? | Page 3
 
.
Who cares about Congo and Angola. I like watching dick-head Vladi squirm. Will he have enough money left to build the Berlin Wall 2.0 ?:rofl:
 
. . . .
This is obviously a closely calculated move whose ultimate consequences are yet to be known. I am not sure where I stand myself but that's not strange given the fact that I do not know about the calculations that have caused this policy etc. Despite that I do not believe that KSA would be willing to make such a "gamble" without reason.

All I know is that KSA has the most healthy account balance in the world and that it is the biggest surplus nation together with China. Not strange then that those two countries trade volume and relations on all fronts (nuclear energy, military, politics, economy etc.) are growing at a high rate each year. Moreover the Saudi Arabian economy is growing at a very fast rate contrary to most other economic powers. In fact if I am not wrong then we have been predicated to have the highest growth rate from 2015 until 2025 among all the G-20 Major Economies Member States.

People speak like there is no shale oil reserves in KSA. They are wrong. In fact KSA has one of the biggest reserves as well and most of the country is yet to be explored due to the high costs of such operations.

Anyway for each year the non-oil/gas/natural resources portion of the Saudi Arabian economy is growing at a very high level on a yearly basis (about 8% if I remember correctly) and there is no sign of that changing anytime soon rather the opposite according to all economic reports out there whether local or international.

In the future I am also very hopeful of the GCC or the Arabian Peninsula as a whole uniting into 1 country. This way the enormous natural riches of those countries will be centralized and belong to 1 federal state. Of course the West and everyone else (almost) is not interested in that but if certain things changes there is little they can do. That's another discussion though.

Anyway regarding shale oil extraction. It's true that innovations in drilling and hydraulic technologies have opened new supplies of shale oil and gas for the US and other countries but there is good reason to believe that the "shale boom" may be overstated.

Firstly the processes are costly. Chemicals and water are pumped underground, requiring the disposal of millions of liters wastewater. The new wells have a shorter lifespan and the scale of additional investment required to keep the boom going appears unsustainable giving the absent technological breakthroughs as of now.
A secure market requires the right geology, government regulations, technical expertise and funding. Also without further technological development, the shale oil revolution could be a passing trend that simply delays the search and development of alternative fuels that stem climate change.

Has Saudi Arabia declared "Oil Price War"? | Page 3

Most people consider that it's a conspiracy move to bog down Russian economy. It doesn't hurt US because it is no longer ME oil dependent. So the importance of ME countries is no more significant to the interests of US. I am surprised that SA would get involved in a dirty game like this.
 
.
Most people consider that it's a conspiracy move to bog down Russian economy. It doesn't hurt US because it is no longer ME oil dependent. So the importance of ME countries is no more significant to the interests of US. I am surprised that SA would get involved in a dirty game like this.

I am not sure that it has anything to do with that other than just gaining a bigger share of the oil exports. The foreign minister of KSA Prince Saud al-Faisal met with Sergey Lavrov last Friday in Russia.

Besides that move must, at least indirectly, have something to do with the shale oil in the US. We don't know all the details and we can only speculate. This policy might change next month as well.
 
. .
I am not sure that it has anything to do with that other than just gaining a bigger share of the oil exports. The foreign minister of KSA Prince Saud al-Faisal met with Sergey Lavrov last Friday in Russia.

Besides that move must, at least indirectly, have something to do with the shale oil in the US. We don't know all the details and we can only speculate. This policy might change next month as well.

It would hit several other high cost oil producers, such as Norway, Nigeria...before Russia, I guess.
 
.
Although Russia seems less concerned about falling oil prices than Venezuela or Bahrain but you do have to factor in the points that these countries are not in the state of war with a neighbouring country and are not fighting US hegemony.At the end of the day the US main objective which was to slow down the military growth of Russia is fulfilled and they also get cheap oil from it.From whichever angle you see this,it is a win-win situation for US.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom