What's new

The Sorry State of the Indian Army

so you mean to say .... army is redundant?:woot:

then why the nonsense about threat from east for withdrawl of troops to FATA not taking place?your missiles are enough you claim

When you do n t understands something so it’s better to keep your mouth shut. The striking of the missiles from both sides will cause a lot of damage on both sides which will be difficult to recover when the war will be over. So its mean the side affects of the war are worse.
 
Well if INDIA really attacked PAKISTAN, it would have solved one problem for us. All the national crisis & the civil strife would have been over in a day with both MILITANTS & ARMY at once finding a common foe .NRO-ians booted out of power.

Don't you think India is achieving more by not going to war ?
 
When you do n t understands something so it’s better to keep your mouth shut. The striking of the missiles from both sides will cause a lot of damage on both sides which will be difficult to recover when the war will be over. So its mean the side affects of the war are worse.

really? do you have any idea of concept of conflict escalation and management, something taught to all higher ranking officers who actually command the army and something that is taken into account as a guiding principle in any conflict especially in a scenario where the potential of the conflict to encompass a nuclear component is extremely vast?
 
:hitwall:
what your point:coffee:

That usage of ballastic missile will be an escalation to a nuclear level, nobattlefield commander can afford it. As long as Pakistan has a first use policy, it is impossible to use ballastic missiles in a normal way. So leave your seconds theory out, no military commander will escalate to nuclear level at all .....
 
That was my point that both side can n t afford war. It does n t matter about the first use policy. What ever side start losing the war will call international community first than if it does n t work will use nukes.
 
That was my point that both side can n t afford war. It does n t matter about the first use policy. What ever side start losing the war will call international community first than if it does n t work will use nukes.

actually your points are confused ........


go to your original post ..... conventional engagement in a limited zone and limited area will always be on ...... so get your basics right .
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom