What's new

The rule of law in countries around the world (2020)

If rule of law doesn't bring peace and order, what's rule of law is there for?


Yes, those incidents happen, maybe even on yearly basis, but we don't regularly have massive social disturbances that you guys experience all the time.

Rule of law means that criminals get punished, but more importantly, the innocent go free. Also, laws have to conform to human rights. You could literally remove all crime by declaring that anyone accused of even stealing bread is given the death penalty or his hands chopped off(as done in certain gulf countries)

Rule of law at full play


I would rather risk that than risk getting a crazy guy in power who asks me to stop growing crops and make pig iron in my backyard steel furnaces. That sort of thing wiped out like 40 million of you. Such sort of bullshit could never happen in India. Problem with a communist system is that those in power have 0 accountability and make rules at their whim.
 
.
Rule of law means that criminals get punished, but more importantly, the innocent go free. Also, laws have to conform to human rights. You could literally remove all crime by declaring that anyone accused of even stealing bread is given the death penalty or his hands chopped off(as done in certain gulf countries)



I would rather risk that than risk getting a crazy guy in power who asks me to stop growing crops and make pig iron in my backyard steel furnaces. That sort of thing wiped out like 40 million of you. Such sort of bullshit could never happen in India. Problem with a communist system is that those in power have 0 accountability and make rules at their whim.
That guy doesn't understand what rule of law is, he is confusing it with law and order.
 
.
That guy doesn't understand what rule of law is, he is confusing it with law and order.
If rule of law doesn't bring peace and order, what's rule of law is there for?

I would rather risk that than risk getting a crazy guy in power who asks me to stop growing crops and make pig iron in my backyard steel furnaces. That sort of thing wiped out like 40 million of you. Such sort of bullshit could never happen in India. Problem with a communist system is that those in power have 0 accountability and make rules at their whim.
Mao made some honest mistakes, I admit it, but he almost transformed China culturally and ideologically , did away many backward customs and drawbacks that may perpetually slow the country down, in a sense , he paved the way and laid the cultural and ideological foundation for China's future development.
China and India were at relatively similar development level 70 years ago, and now see what different system of governance brought to the two countries and two peoples.
 
.
If rule of law doesn't bring peace and order, what's rule of law is there for?


Mao made some honest mistakes, I admit it, but he almost transformed China culturally and ideologically , did away many backward customs and drawbacks that may perpetually slow the country down, in a sense , he paved the way and laid the cultural and ideological foundation for China's future development.
China and India were at relatively similar development level 70 years ago, and now see what different system of governance brought to the two countries and two peoples.
To provide justice, duh. I know you won't understand. Leave it. In any case, instead on dissing on India for ranking higher why not take it up with the rank issuers and make China #1 in rule of law index.
 
. .
China has no less justice than India if not more, that's really not something you can brag about.
Please rule of law is when both the parties have a say in justice system. Law and order is related to police system. China courts are kangaroo courts when it comes to CCP related matters.
 
.
Please rule of law is when both the parties have a say in justice system. Law and order is related to police system. China courts are kangaroo courts when it comes to CCP related matters.
That's your standard of rule of law, our understanding of rule of law is bringing peace and order, delivering justice to the general public, not different political parties wasting tax payers money bickering over petty issues and making empty promises which they can never deliver.
 
.
That's your standard of rule of law, our understanding of rule of law is bringing peace and order, delivering justice to the general public, not different political parties wasting tax payers money bickering over petty issues and making empty promises which they can never deliver.
Dude, there is only one understanding of 'rule of law', and that is related to justice system. Don't go defining rule of law to the world outside China. Be happy with what you have. And let us be.
 
.
Dude, there is only one understanding of 'rule of law',
No, even Bible can be interpreted in different ways by different people, you are so naive to believe something like rule of law be can only interprete by your way of thinking.
 
.
If rule of law doesn't bring peace and order, what's rule of law is there for?


Mao made some honest mistakes, I admit it, but he almost transformed China culturally and ideologically , did away many backward customs and drawbacks that may perpetually slow the country down, in a sense , he paved the way and laid the cultural and ideological foundation for China's future development.
China and India were at relatively similar development level 70 years ago, and now see what different system of governance brought to the two countries and two peoples.

China and India had the same GDP till 1990. You just began economic liberalization far before we did. It is more to do with economic policies than governance. We have several socialist policies until today that prevent growth as seen in China- Labour laws that prevent firing of workers, land laws that prevent the govt from seizing farmer land to make way for highways/ development etc.
 
.
No, even Bible can be interpreted in different ways by different people, you are so naive to believe something like rule of law be can only interprete by your way of thinking.
Omg, I am speaking to an idiot.

China and India had the same GDP till 1990. You just began economic liberalization far before we did. It is more to do with economic policies than governance. We have several socialist policies until today that prevent growth as seen in China- Labour laws that prevent firing of workers, land laws that prevent the govt from seizing farmer land to make way for highways/ development etc.
They opened up in 1978 and we in 1991. They were autocratic and we were democratic the whole time.
 
.
China and India had the same GDP till 1990. You just began economic liberalization far before we did. It is more to do with economic policies than governance. We have several socialist policies until today that prevent growth as seen in China- Labour laws that prevent firing of workers, land laws that prevent the govt from seizing farmer land to make way for highways/ development etc.
We look at China and India's development modes as a whole, not over time sections, we still follow the same curve now.

Omg, I am speaking to an idiot.
Please no personal attack.
 
.
We look at China and India's development modes as a whole, not over time sections, we still follow the same curve now.


Please no personal attack.
Buddy, its the rule of law index not country excellence index. Please in your jest to defend China, you are now not making any sense. You better leave it here.
 
.
We look at China and India's development modes as a whole, not over time sections, we still follow the same curve now.


Please no personal attack.

Could you further elaborate how our development models are different? Both of us want to attract foreign investment to mass produce goods for export. But China is highly succesful and India is a failure. Again as I said that is to do with land and labor laws in India. Apart from that we are pretty same I would say. Overall, I would say both our nations are failures. When have China or India ever invented something that has revolutionalised the world? Do India or China have a lot of nobel prize winners? No. Do we have companies like Google/Microsoft/Apple etc who are at the forefront? No. We just let the Western do all the hard work and they come manufacture here, that is our development model. India and China have never even invented a single pharmaceutical drug on their own, we just wait for western patents to run out and mass product generics. Sorry, there is no genious in what China did. China did much much better than India, but overall we are the same.
 
.
Buddy, its the rule of law index not country excellence index. Please in your jest to defend China, you are now not making any sense. You better leave it here.

This report is very debatable if not total BS, the west just doesn't know China and has bias and prejudice mud their eyes and minds all the time, it's just a another piece of anti China junk they churn out every other day.

Overall, I would say both our nations are failures.
You can have your own opinion, but different people judge success and failure with their own opinions, you think China is a failure doesn't mean others share the same view.

India and China have never even invented a single pharmaceutical drug on their own,
I honestly don't know how true is this statement, but still the world depends on Chinese pharmaceuticals.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom